WP: Tanker Scandal Inquiry Finds Rumsfeld's Attention Was Elsewhere

Tanker Inquiry Finds Rumsfeld's Attention Was Elsewhere
By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 20, 2006; Page A15

The topic was the largest defense procurement scandal in recent decades, and the two investigators for the Pentagon's inspector general in Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's office on April 1, 2005, asked the secretary to raise his hand and swear to tell the truth.

Rumsfeld agreed but complained. "I find it strange," he said to the investigators, on the grounds that as a government official "the laws apply to me" anyway.

It was a bumpy start to an odd interview, as Rumsfeld cited poor memory, loose office procedures, and a general distraction with "the wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan to explain why he was unsure how his department came to nearly squander $30 billion leasing several hundred new tanker aircraft that its own experts had decided were not needed.

Then-Inspector General Joseph E. Schmitz, who resigned last year to take a job with a defense contractor, told senators at a June 2005 hearing that the transcript of Rumsfeld's interview was deleted from his 256-page report on the tanker lease scandal because Rumsfeld had not said anything relevant.

But a copy of the transcript, obtained recently by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information Act after a year-long wait, says a lot about how little of Rumsfeld's attention has been focused on weapons-buying -- a function that consumes nearly a fifth of the $410 billion defense budget, exclusive of expenditures in Iraq and Afghanistan....(A) series of reports, including others by the inspector general and by the Government Accountability Office, indicate that five years into the Bush administration, the department's system of buying new weapons is broken and dysfunctional....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/19/AR2006061901090.html

and their lobby lawyers. For them it's living off the fat of the land, literally.

Wes Clark has made a point of his knowledge of this dysfunction, and how to fix it.

The gov't contractors and their lobby lawyers won't be backing Wes Clark.

..."selective amnesia?"

Sure is funny how these guys never remember when they commit a crime. :mad:

Asked whether his subordinates, including former undersecretary of defense Edward C. "Pete" Aldridge, had accurately invoked Rumsfeld's approval when they signed documents authorizing the Boeing tanker lease to go forward, Rumsfeld said, "I may very well have said yes. I just don't remember. . . . I am not going to sit here and quibble over it." He did say he remembered approving a gun for a tank in 1976, during his first time as defense secretary.

Very selective.

How does this/that/the other thing affect Donald Rumsfeld? Defense procurement? Doesn't affect Rumsfeld, doesn't care. The law? Doesn't apply to Rumsfeld, doesn't care. A $410 billion annual defense budget. More than a billion dollars a day, every day. Saturdays, Sundays, holidays too. Every fucking day, another billion dollars down the bottomless maw of the military-industrial complex. And what are the media whores focused on? Some woman with six kids from New Orleans who lost everything who spent an extra $250 FEMA card.

Pretty soon you're talking real money.

on the grounds that as a government official "the laws apply to me" anyway.

That about says it all about this bunch of crooks.

says it aloud!!

Oh I forgot, Congress doesn't do anything anymore except enable these bastards.

those new bunker-busting nukes.

... then he is incompetent and needs to be replaced. Very basic.