Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP/AP: Episcopal Leaders Approve Compromise on Gay Bishops (new vote)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 07:32 PM
Original message
WP/AP: Episcopal Leaders Approve Compromise on Gay Bishops (new vote)
Episcopal Leaders Approve Compromise on Gay Bishops
By Rachel Zoll
Associated Press
Thursday, June 22, 2006; Page A02

COLUMBUS, Ohio, June 21 -- Episcopal delegates approved a last-ditch attempt by their chief pastor Wednesday to salvage worldwide Anglican unity, voting to adopt a resolution that calls on U.S. church leaders to "exercise restraint" when considering gay candidates for bishop.

The nonbinding measure stops far short of the moratorium on gay bishops that Anglican leaders demanded to calm conservative outrage over the 2003 consecration of Bishop V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire, who lives with his longtime male partner.

But it may leave open the chance for discussion between leaders of the Episcopal Church and other members of the Anglican Communion, who are badly at odds over gay clergy. Traditionalists hold that the Bible specifically prohibits gay sex.

The legislation passed in the final hours of an anguished nine-day General Convention. It asks Episcopal leaders to "exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration" of candidates for bishop "whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church."

The House of Deputies, made up of more than 800 laypeople and clergy members, voted for the compromise resolution, one day after killing stronger legislation that would have urged dioceses to refrain from choosing bishops in same-sex relationships....

(Read more for fuller explanation.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062100909.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. "As long as they don't attempt to marry each OTHER it's probably alright"
LOL! .... but absolutely no Constitutional Rights ... NONE ... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, I've read that our new presiding bishop
supports same-sex unions, and developing a liturgy for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sounds good to me...
I am lay reader and married mother of 4. I can't object to blessing commitment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC