WP: Lawmakers' Profits Are Scrutinized (Culture of Corruption Back On)

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) made a $2 million profit last year on the sale of land 5 1/2 miles from a highway project that he helped to finance with targeted federal funds.

A Republican House member from California, meanwhile, received nearly double what he paid for a four-acre parcel near an Air Force base after securing $8 million for a planned freeway interchange 16 miles away. And another California GOP congressman obtained funding in last year's highway bill for street improvements near a planned residential and commercial development that he co-owns.

In all three cases, Hastert and Reps. Ken Calvert and Gary Miller say that they were securing funds their home districts wanted badly, and that in no way did the earmarks have any impact on the land values of their investments. But for watchdog groups, the cases have opened a fresh avenue for investigation and a new wrinkle in the ongoing controversy over earmarks -- home-district projects funded through narrowly written legislative language.

For more than a year, the congressional corruption scandal triggered by former lobbyist Jack Abramoff has focused attention on earmarks secured by lawmakers on lobbyists' and government contractors' behalf. Now watchdog groups are combing through lawmakers' land holdings and legislative activities, searching for earmarks that may have boosted the value of those investments.

"The sound bites from politicians have always been that they're doing what's best for their districts, but we're starting to see a pattern that looks like they might be doing what's best for their pocketbooks," said Keith Ashdown, vice president of the group Taxpayers for Common Sense.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062102210.html

Some ethics they're exhibiting. :eyes:

And we wonder why people do not like to vote.

One with the failed land deal in Arkansas, and one with the bricks of cash in the freezer, I'm sure they'll find it in their interest to scrutinize these happy "coincidences" :sarcasm:

in a focused investigation like this ...

afaik, "the people" in his district, or at least a vocal bunch of them, are furiously opposed to this highway. i am a little outside his district, but i was raised there. i keep one ear open for news there.