Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thousands claim exposure in 9/11 aftermath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 08:40 AM
Original message
Thousands claim exposure in 9/11 aftermath

http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060622/NEWS02/606220379/1027/NEWS11

Thousands claim exposure in 9/11 aftermath

David Worby is now at the helm of what he calls the largest and most important class-action lawsuit in U.S. history, representing thousands of people he says are dying at an accelerated pace from exposure to toxins at Ground Zero.

He says a national health emergency should be declared because his 8,000 clients are developing cancer, kidney and respiratory ailments in the nearly five years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

...

He has sued New York City and its contractors, who oversaw the rescue and cleanup, claiming they failed to protect workers from cancer-causing benzene and other hazardous chemicals that filled the air. Worby returns today to a federal court in Manhattan, where the defense will argue for a dismissal on the grounds that the city made a "good faith" effort to safeguard workers by providing them equipment, such as masks, and trying to ensure they used it.

The city's lawyers also claim that New York is legally immune from liability while providing services during an attack on U.S. soil.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who told the EPA to say what? HMMM.....
And why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Some links regarding WTC air.
http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/wtc-index.htm
http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/

The Project continues to advocate for those caught in the downwind of the World Trade Center Disaster. Our well-publicized campaign has brought awareness of the eruption of dangers to our environment that we now face since 9-11, plans for a major cleanup, and continues to catalyze actions to rectify these situations.

http://www.wtceo.org/
You can click on the pictures for more dust cloud pictures.

http://www.911ea.org/Front_Page.htm

In a resolution scheduled to be introduced today, the Council will join community groups, labor unions and the city's Congressional delegation in condemning the way the Environmental Protection Agency has handled environmental and health issues resulting from the destruction of the World Trade Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for those good links!
I especially have a lot of respect for the New York Environmental Law and Justice Project.

The physicist and atmospheric scientist Thomas Cahill has done some great research on the toxic air pollution which rose from the smouldering ruins of the WTC for months after 9/11. He explains some of the strange super-heated chemical processes deep in the rubble, which proved especially deadly for the people working on the site rite after 9/11.

Here's a good general interest article about Cahill's "Deeper Criticisms" of the EPA's misleading approach:
http://www.neha.org/9-11%20report/index-Deeper.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. ...expressed more concern about air quality than...another attack...
...In a survey done in May 2002 regarding public health issues following September 11, residents of lower Manhattan expressed more concern about air quality than they did about another terrorist attack...

From your link.
http://www.neha.org/9-11%20report/index-Deeper.html

You could smell that it wasn't meant to be breathed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RCinBrooklyn Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. I got asthma from walking thru that toxic cloud on 9/11.
I live about two miles downwind from the burning pile of the WTC. Never had a lung ailment before. Now I need an inhaler. Another friend is congested all the time and lost his sense of smell. Another has had bouts of bronchitis. More people are coming down with illnesses related to the air as time moves forward. The health crisis fallout from this is huge. It will be costly to the government, but the evidence is there. Watch for this suit to be squashed for political and PR reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's what a cop who worked rescue there said.
He said he got asthma. I wonder if it's something other than asthma. No real reason, but I just wonder.

Welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, the city's lawyers are probably correct on immunity from a legal
viewpoint, especially with the present Supremes we have...
Maybe they ought to sue individual Saudis who gave Old Sammy the bucks for the pilot training...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "while providing services during an attack on U.S. soil"
...I'd like to see that case law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. August 26, 2003 Hillary Clinton
Tuesday 26 August 2003

Outraged that the White House misled New Yorkers about air quality after the Sept. 11 terror attack, Sen. Hillary Clinton and dozens of other city and state officials demanded a presidential explanation.

A report released Friday by the Inspector General of the federal Environmental Protection Agency found that the White House instructed EPA officials to reassure New Yorkers that the air was safe to breathe after the attacks, even though deadly contaminants were present in lower Manhattan.

The report said in editing EPA press releases the White House "added reassuring statements and deleted cautionary statements."

Speaking on the steps of City Hall, Clinton said she had sent a letter to President George W. Bush Tuesday asking for a thorough and expeditious accounting of what transpired in the White House after the attacks, including the names of officials who changed EPA information.

"Maybe after the first couple of days nobody could know," Clinton said, referring to the EPA statements after Sept. 11. "But a week later? Two weeks later? Two months later? Six months later? Give me a break. They knew and they were going to tell us the truth and the White House told them not to tell us the truth.

"Now they should come to New York and face us," she said.

White House representatives have argued against the Inspector General's findings, stating that the choices made by the Bush administration were necessary for national security reasons.

In the letter to the president, Clinton also asked the Bush administration to implement a new testing program to ensure residents are no longer at risk of exposure to harmful toxins in the dust and air.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) called on Mayor Michael Bloomberg to take a more active role in pressing the federal government for a proper cleanup of lower Manhattan homes, schools and businesses.

At the news conference, Madelyn Wils, chairwoman of Community Board 1, said much of the blame should also be placed on the administration of former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani for not responding to concerns of residents in lower Manhattan immediately after the attack.

While much of the city was focused on recovering victims from the debris, Wils said the health of residents and workers was largely ignored.

"Who was looking after the living?" Wils asked. "No one was looking after the living."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC