transmission. It is old news and I guess because i have been following it for so long I though everyone was aware of it.
Here is an article.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/04/news/flu.phpSUNDAY, JUNE 4, 2006
In the wake of a cluster of avian flu cases that killed seven members of a rural Indonesian family, it appears likely that there have been many more human-to-human infections than the authorities have previously acknowledged.
The numbers are still relatively small, and they do not mean that the virus has mutated to pass easily between people - a change that could touch off a worldwide epidemic. All the clusters of cases have been among relatives or in nurses who were in long, close contact with patients.
But the clusters - in Indonesia, Thailand, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Iraq and Vietnam - paint a grimmer picture of the virus's potential to pass from human to human than is normally described by public health officials, who usually say such cases are "rare."
Until recently, World Health Organization representatives have said there were only two or three such cases.
On May 24, Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, estimated that there had been "at least three." Then, on May 30, Maria Cheng, a spokeswoman for the UN health agency, said there were "probably about half a dozen." She added, "I don't think anybody's got a solid number."
And Dr. Angus Nicoll, chief of flu activities at the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, acknowledged that "we are probably underestimating the extent of person-to-person transmission."
The handful of cases usually cited, he said, are "just the open-and-shut ones," like the infections of nurses in the 1997 Hong Kong outbreak and of a Bangkok office worker who died in 2004 after tending her daughter who fell sick on an aunt's farm.
Most clusters are hard to investigate, he said, because they may not even be noticed until a victim is hospitalized, and are often in remote villages where people fear talking about it. Also, he said, by the time doctors from Geneva arrive to take samples, the local authorities "have often killed all the chickens and covered everything with lime."
The WHO is generally conservative in its announcements and, as a UN agency, is sometimes limited by member states in what it is permitted to say about them.
Still, several scientists have noted that there are many clusters in which human-to-human infection may be a more logical explanation than the idea that relatives who fell sick days apart got the virus from the same dying bird.
For example, a letter published last November in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases analyzed 15 family clusters from 2003 through mid-2005 in Southeast Asia. Scientists from the disease control centers, the WHO and several Asian health ministries noted that four clusters had gaps of more than seven days between in the time frame in which family members got sick.
They questioned conventional wisdom that only one, the Bangkok office worker, was "likely" human-to-human.
In one Vietnam cluster, not only did a young man, his teenage sister and 80-year- old grandfather test positive for H5N1 avian flu, but two nurses tending them developed severe pneumonia, and one tested positive.
In another questionable case, the Vietnamese government's assertion that a man developed the flu 16 days after eating raw duck-blood pudding was publicly ridiculed by a prominent flu specialist at Hong Kong University, who said it was more likely that he got it from his sick brother.
snip
And in a study published just last month about a village in Azerbaijan, scientists from WHO and the U.S. Navy said human-to-human transmission was possible.
more at the above article
I was answering your question re a link re 20 percent possibility it may go pandemic.
There was a recent article questioning the prevading thoughts that the case fatality rate had to drop. There is nothing that says it has to. I can dig that one up for you too. The 1918 pandemic had a 2-5 percent fatlity rate and 50 -100 million people died. Right now h5n1 has over a fifty percent fatality rate. Even if it dropped to 25 percent and went pandemic it would be a disaster. And the govt has said we would be on our own and not to expect help from the feds and to prepare. They say two weeks provisions which is ridiculous. Three months is what the state dept is telling the embassies overseas to tell their people there and that in my opinion is a minimum amt.
From the WHO geneva conference in Sept
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/WHO_CDS_EPR_GIP_2006_3C.pdf"One especially
important question that was discussed is whether the H5N1 virus is likely to retain
its present high lethality should it acquire an ability to spread easily from person to
person, and thus start a pandemic.
Should the virus improve its transmissibility by
acquiring, through a reassortment event, internal human genes, then the lethality of
the virus would most likely be reduced. However, should the virus improve its
transmissibility through adaptation as a wholly avian virus, then the present high
lethality could be maintained during a pandemic."This caused quite a stir in the scientific community
If you have any questions I would be glad to direct you to more info.