Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: AT&T offers concessions in merger deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:40 PM
Original message
AP: AT&T offers concessions in merger deal
AT&T offers concessions in merger deal

By JOHN DUNBAR, Associated Press Writer
57 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - AT&T Inc. has offered a new set of concessions that are expected
to satisfy the two Democrats on the Federal Communications Commission and lead
to approval of the company's $85 billion buyout of BellSouth Corp.

Approval by the full commission could happen as soon as Friday.

AT&T filed a letter of commitment with the agency Thursday night that adds a
number of new conditions to the deal, including a promise to observe "network
neutrality" principles, an offer of affordable stand-alone digital subscriber line
service and divestment of some wireless spectrum.

Final approval still requires a vote of the commissioners, which can happen at any
time via computer. The proposed deal is the largest telecommunications merger in U.S.
history.

-snip-

Full article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061229/ap_on_bi_ge/att_bellsouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if they're offering to observe "network neutrality"...
...for as long as they're merged, or just for the first year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I ditched them for Vonage
the second the deal for AT&T and SBC went through. I'm saving a bloody fortune and I don't have to say I support AT&T financially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchleary Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I liked Vonage until
I heard Burns or one of the other GOP used their corporate jet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Unfortunately...
if we quit using products from companies that shamelessly give crap away to easy to buy politicians we'd have to go back to living off the land without material goods. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about offering to stop their illegal spying on behalf of the NSA?
Not to mention their wholesale forwarding of everyone's telephone calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. When is the government going to apply . . .
the same rules to all the network companies? Net neutrality is BS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The cable companies are not regulated to nearly the same extent.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Net Neutrality shouldn't be a bargaining chip, it should be the law.
IME AT&T's "promises" are worthless and all this does is it make it so the "Baby Bells" can eventually be rejoined and once again "Ma Bell", can rise again under a different name. Who needs competition right? :sarcasm: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-30-06 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. There is plenty of competition . . .
And you have to regulate all the companies equally, or none at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC