Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Clash on War on Terror, Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 07:28 PM
Original message
Democrats Clash on War on Terror, Iraq
Source: Associated Press

Democrats Clash on War on Terror, Iraq

Jun 3, 8:10 PM (ET)

By BETH FOUHY


Democratic Presidential hopeful former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., left, makes a statement about Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., right, during the Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by Saint Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., Sunday, June 3, 2007. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)


MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) - Democratic presidential candidates clashed on Sunday over whether the Bush administration had made the country safer from terrorism after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards called President Bush's global war on terrorism a "political slogan, a bumper sticker, that's all it is" in the second televised debate pitting the eight Democratic contenders.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is the front-runner in national polls, said she did not agree with Edwards characterization of the war on terrorism.

As a senator from New York, "I have seen first hand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists."


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20070604/D8PHLHE00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guess what Hilly, we all saw it!!!
"As a senator from New York, 'I have seen first hand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists.' "

Just because you are the senator from New York does not mean you are the only on qualified to know, see, feel, or comment on 9/11. If that is your argument, Rudy will kick your butt, he was in the city on the day it happened!!

A little rant, I am done now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. totally, I was just gonna say,
that is such a Giuliani tactic. did you see the Onion article "Giuliani to run for President of 9/11"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dennis Kucinich won the debate hands down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentProgressive Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What the fuck was with Blitzer going after him about Bin Laden?
This was audience question time and Blitzer made his own question just to snipe at Kucinich. I thought he was a FORMER AIPAC lobbyist not current.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go John!
I didn't see the debate, but it sounds like Edwards nailed it!

Shame on Hillary for trying to wrap herself in the same hypocrisy-soaked flag that Bush has used to devastate our once great nation and as much of the rest of the world as he can lie Congress into letting him get his hands on.

John Edwards knows that while the Repukes had us looking over our shoulder for "terra, terra, terra," he and his corporate cronies were shredding the Constitution and robbing us blind.

Hillary, you'd better wake up or shut up!

Bill must be hanging his head in shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wathcing the debate last night was horrible...
To think Hillary and Edwards are two of our front runners.

Neither read the IWR...@#$%ing John Edwards sponsored Lieberman's resolution yet never read it?!

Both say they were "briefed" by past adminastrations...Edwards mentioned "the Clinton's".

Whenever I see Edwards act as if he's taking the higher road for admitting his "mistake" for voting (NOT SPONSORING) the IWR, I want to clock him.

I'm tired of hearing people in charge who @#$%-up and think the words "I'm sorry" fixes everything.

...it's like saying "I'm sorry I got your kid killed, but vote for me".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC