Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA misled Britain over rendition plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:47 PM
Original message
CIA misled Britain over rendition plan
Source: Colin Brown, Deputy Political Editor

The CIA misled British intelligence chiefs over the arrest and treatment of terrorist suspects who were the subjects of rendition to Guantanamo Bay, an Intelligence and Security Committee report to the Prime Minister warned.

It said the deception threatens to undermine confidence in the exchange of intelligence between the CIA and MI6.

Coming only days before the Prime Minister flies to Washington for a summit with President George Bush, the report could prove embarrassing for Gordon Brown. However, he brushed aside the committee's criticism of the US over rendition. "Where people are at risk of being tortured we have made very clear about our rejection of such a policy... But I am not going to condemn the US authorities," he said.

The MPs found no evidence of complicity by the UK in secret CIA rendition flights, but it said ministers should never agree to suspects being handed over to the US authorities where there is no prospect of a proper trial.

Read more: http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2802627.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. UK Lawmakers Criticize Secret Renditions
A parliamentary report released Wednesday criticized U.S. intelligence agencies for ignoring British concerns and sending two British residents to Guantanamo Bay more than four years ago.

Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee said the incident had ''serious implications for the intelligence relationship'' between the two countries.

The committee said British spy agencies passed on intelligence about British residents Bisher al-Rawi and Jamil el-Banna, who were detained in Gambia in 2002, on the understanding that no action would be taken by U.S. authorities.

''The Security Service did not foresee that the U.S. authorities would disregard the caveats, given that they had honored the caveat system for the past 20 years,'' the report said.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Britain-Rendition.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. BBC link for you
British concerns did not appear to "materially" affect US actions in its "war on terror", the UK's intelligence and security committee has said.
>
The committee said it had found no evidence that the UK was directly involved in rendition flights - the transportation of terror suspects to foreign prisons where they could face torture.

But Britain's security services had "inadvertently" helped in one case after the US ignored caveats placed on supplied information.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6915652.stm

Hopefully things will now change following the departure of The Tiny Blur. I don't think Brownie will be able to exercise the degree of control over the Cabinet that Blur did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Bush Administration lied to your face, England
But let's not condemn the people who lied to you and then tortured folks. Tut, tut and all that. Carry on. Stiff upper lip, you know. Let's not act too hasty. Besides it was just some brown chaps, nobody civilized, wot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, that would be so undiplomatic
It's what would come next if he did challenge Bush publically on the lie that we can only speculate about, but I'd guess it would not be pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NancyBreen Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is the privatised, corporate CIA, no??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC