Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police Break Up Anti-War Meeting in Washington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:41 AM
Original message
Police Break Up Anti-War Meeting in Washington
Source: Agence France-Presse

Police break up anti-war meeting in Washington
Thu Sep 6, 5:35 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Mounted police charged in to break up an outdoor press conference and demonstration against the Iraq war in Washington on Thursday, arresting three people, organizers and an AFP reporter said.

"The police suppressed the press conference. In the middle of the speeches, they grabbed the podium" erected in a park in front of the White House for the small gathering, Brian Becker, national organizer of the ANSWER anti-war coalition, told AFP. "Then, mounted police charged the media present to disperse them," Becker said.

The charge caused a peaceful crowd of some 20 journalists and four or five protestors to scatter in terror, an AFP correspondent at the event in Lafayette Square said. No one appeared to have been hurt. Three people -- Tina Richards, the mother of a marine who did two tours of duty in Iraq; Adam Kokesh, a leader of the Iraq Veterans Against the War group; and lawyer Ian Thompson, who is an organizer for ANSWER in Los Angeles -- were arrested, Becker said.

The ANSWER coalition is trying to rally support for an anti-war demonstration in Washington that is due to take place on September 15.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070906/pl_afp/usiraqdemo_070906213528





Mods - technically this is over 12 hours, but apparently no one else has posted it (that I can tell) and it is an important story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll bet people wearing antiwar t-shirts in DC
next weekend get harassed. Just for being on the street...

EVERYONE bring cameras...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. CAMERAS ++
That's how they caught the provocateurs in Montebello, Quebec. Gave the cops one hell of a black eye.

Every single person that is on the street in a protest, rally or vigil, without exception, should have a camera of some sort.

Some people should have decent camcorders & such to get a good high quality recording of any incidents, but every person should have a camera phone, or if you can't afford a camera phone, at least get a still camera, or even a $10 disposable camera.

But everyone should have a camera of some sort. In the LA May Day Police Riot, the cops specifically targeted people with cameras. But if everyone has a camera, and is ready to record any police misconduct for later broadcast on Youtube or Flickr, they can't get them all.

So for any law enforcement that happens to be reading this (Hi Agent Mike!) be on your best behavior. Any abuses or foulups will be broadcast, and you can't stop us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why do the police feel the need to ruin an ANSWER protest?
ANSWER does a good job of ruining them all by themselves :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedomofspeech Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Could you explain, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Simple, they can't stay on point for longer than two seconds
They use valuable TV airtime to talk about every issue under the sun but Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That was at one rally two years ago
Good grief. Move beyond that and help us end the war. Keep your eye on the prize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. Exactly...
According to the article it sounds like they only had 4 or 5 protesters but 20 media (good for them on the media turnout for such a small protest, BTW). Seeing ANSWER in action in the past, I wouldn't be surprised to find that of the 5 protesters, one had a sign about Iraq, one about Darfur, a "Free Mumia" sign, a legalize hemp sign, and a climate change sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. I am good friends with Tina Richards
and I know Adam Kokesh as well.

Neither is with ANSWER. They each represent other anti-war organizations who have chosen to help promote the march on Sept 15. And they both spent the night in jail because they support publicizing the march on Sept 15.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. So this was not an ANSWER event?
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 12:43 PM by hughee99
I was under the impression that it was, but after rereading it, I'm not sure. I have no issues with either Tina Richards or Adam Kokesh, but I still agree with the assessment that ANSWER itself tends to get off-point easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. ANSWER is sponsoring the march
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 02:11 PM by proud2Blib
Tina and Adam are the leaders of organizations that are participating in the march. Yesterday they had a press conference regarding the posters that the city is fining ANSWER for. They were arrested for putting up posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Part of what HAS put us in this situation is that everything is DUMBED down,
so the People fall to the lowered expectations "we" have for them, hence sound-bites and ALL issues over-simplified into false dichotomies.

Everything **IS** related to everything else and that's what I like about ANSWER.

The longer that we accept the paternalistic attitude that the $o-called expert$ should exclusively define the issues for us, the longer our dependency is enabled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Kokesh is with Iraq Vets Against the War.
And unpopular, fractuous protest organizations have free speech rights, too, last time I checked. And the war is still going on the last time I checked.

Three people got arrested when they could just stay home and watch TV, or sit on the Internet and make derogatory comments.

The last few ANSWER protests have gone very well, from what I've heard and seen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. Wow, 60% of the demonstrators got arrested!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Are you saying we need YOU to organize us?
Show me your plan of action I may join.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. LOL!
Gotta love these keyboard commandos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cordelia106 Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. ANSWER...
I agree Greeby,ANSWER is quite capable of ruining things themselves. Did they have a permit?
Also what was this rally about? They are really good at mudding the waters at anti-war rallies and marches. I,and others,make a point of turning our backs when some speaker from ANSWER starts shrieking
about Israel at any of the many anti-war events I have participated in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. READ and learn
This wasn't ANSWER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
69. You ought to listen...
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 12:11 AM by ProudDad
when "some speaker from ANSWER starts shrieking about Israel at any of the many anti-war events I have participated in"

The Israeli government's illegal occupation of the Palestinian and Syrian territories and, until recently, parts of Lebanon IS the major ongoing problem in the region called the "Middle East".

Until that little problem is resolved and the Palestinian people gain some measure of justice, freedom and a viable state, there'll continue to be problems there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. History always REPEATS ITSELF!
SS tactics are now an accepted part of AmeriKan life.

Screw Dems and Screw Repubs, I'm supporting someone who is passionate about OUR Constitution and the RIGHTS of WE THE PEOPLE, NOT THE CORPORATE SLOBS!


BUT WHO???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDavy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. screw Dems you nn to find a new site to hangout at....if you
don't like US, the Dems....IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's not what the poster meant.
I think the poster was referring to the politicians, not we the people, when he said screw Dems!

Sometimes you've got to read between the lines to get the correct message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Good point about the "Dems" in Congress.
Fuck those Quislings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
49. Agreed! I think there are people who are resisting those who are
paid to think what they think and paid to say what they say - on either side, because their "truths" are too easily biased by the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. Uh, how about Dennis Kucinich - a REAL Democrat?
Not taking corporate money & running for President. Hey, if you want to back a third party or independent, go ahead and see if you can do any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainGlutton Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. Dennis Kucinich, if you can forgive the "D" after his name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Kucinich.He has been fighting for us. If you have time watch these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. Kucinich is my choice for those reasons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. Go Kucinich!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Trying to incite violence
Then they will be able to tag them as terrorist

Everyone best be on their best behavior on the 15th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. And if they can't incite a violent reaction
They'll simply infiltrate the group and have an agent provocateur throw the first rock, or encourage some others to push against the barricades, or shove one of his cop buddies, and then it can be on as far as the cops are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. Eventually, this will happen.
Because we are not leaving Iraq, unfortunately, this effort *must* be supported forthe forseeable future, hence the increased probability that what you describe WILL happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Prelude to what? More of the same. hmmmmf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. Freedom is coming, run for your lives! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. The thugs are getting desperate. We've seen this all before.
And things will get worse before they get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. Deja Vu
Reminds one of the Nixon era. Next we will see the National Guard, or Blackwater, murdering students on the college campuses.

What say you, Madame Speaker?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, it'll be Haliburton that gets the contract for that.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. And Blackwater. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. Also reminiscent of Alice Paul's demonstrations in front of the white house.
In the 19-teens. They were arrested, thrown in the women's workhouse at Occoquan and tortured.

The more things change, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Did I miss it?
What was the police justification for breaking up the protest? Did they not have the proper permit?

Controlling freedom isn't free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. WaPo link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. "The arrested protesters were to be detained overnight"
WTF? for misdemeanors?

I've been to half a dozen protests in DC since 2001, and the DC/Capital Police have been very cool, in my experience. This is odd.

-Cindy in Fort Lauderdale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. Video up on YouTube...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. Looked pretty calm to me
Don't understand why anyone was arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Fuck the pigs
They don't do anything productive in this society anymore - they just continue to militarize themselves and practice nothing but oppression.

I hate cops. All of them. Every video I see like the one of this incident just continues to fuel the hatred. Fuck them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. - - - - -
Un-God-Damn-Believable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. Is it too cynical to think that the police
Is it too cynical to think that the police are simply trying to get some live practice in for their horses prior to the 15th? Why else would they charge such a small group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
26. Two things - a list and an answer ...
. If anyone has the time - we need a list of all the unwarranted bashing of protestor-citizens. Just a fe w days ago - unwarranted treatment of the bicycle people in Minneapolis? (can't remember the name) - right out of the blue. A list is ammunition to those who haven't woken up yet - something that can be handed to them when they start to wake up or they protest your protest.

. As is becoming typical - we don't have the other side of the story on this - was a permit needed and did. they get it? Were they in the right place to do it?

AFP? Did Yahoo truncate what they wrote? Is that all they reported?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. We need to find out what orders have gone out to the police departments.
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 10:09 AM by higher class
And did it come from the RNC?

I wrote RNC purposely. Are they going to have a zero tolerance policy for all their campaigning from now until??? right up to and after their convention?

If RNC wants it, HS will give it to them. Homeland Security same as the RNC as we've found out. No separation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. "was a permit needed"
Just more proof that we do not have freedom of speech anymore. The constitution says nothing about a permit. If you have to ask for free speech, you don't have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. You're right, but I think those planning something should check in
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 04:59 PM by higher class
to the city or police and find out - be prepared at the scene or at the jailhouse.

If there is a list it could include what the people arrested were charged with.

There has to be an education here - and organization. To defend against the media who are going to be told by their owners to make it look like the protestors are the bad guys and the cops the good guys who are protecting the public from protestor-terrorists.

We need this to get back at the media.

What is needed to accompany the list is something that includes what the protestors were charged with and we need to get a statement of why they used the instruments they used on the protestors.

Then, as someone said somewhere this past week - use the cameras.

We should know what the law says about confiscation of cameras.

There's definitely a new order that has come through - things are different.

Can you believe this - we are at war with our own sons and daughters everywhere who as police are at the bottom of the line of order givers?

Russ Feingold - my hero.

American citizens - now the enemy.

Enter the mercenaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
31. Don't turn around.....
Der Kommissar's in town. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
34. So the mounted police were trying to drum up support for Sept 15?
Can't buy publicity like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. Well, free speech and the right to organize IS illegal in Merka along with the right to an atty. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
36. They didn't have a permit
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 11:50 AM by meowomon
And they were illegally posting signs. Am I the only one here that still believes in laws? Now, if they had applied for a permit and were denied, that is another story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Of course
To have freedom of speech you must get your permit and in other cases practice that freedom in authority approved 'free speech zone'. No way should you put up posters without the authorities approving your adhesive. To challenge authority you sometimes have to challenge their laws, of course you have to be willing to suffer the consequnces until you bring about change. I believe in laws but I also appreciate those that are will to put their butts on the line and challenge those laws. I have read a number of people on DU using 'I believe in laws line'. I don't claim to be any great radical but I could read that as 'I have no trouble walking in lockstep to what the authorities tell me to do'. Authorities and those that use authoritarian tactics to control the public should always be challenge and if that means having a small political meeting in public park without a permit so be it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Where does the first amendment address permits?
Did I just miss that part? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
70. It's in the bush/cheney signing statement...
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 12:16 AM by ProudDad
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

"The executive reserves the power to abridge the exercise the freedom of speech and assembly if it gets in the way of our plans for world corporate domination."

Beware the small print...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #40
73. so you are saying that permits are unconstitutonal?
and that there are no legitimate restrictions on speech whatsoever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. I believe in this law:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


I fail to see anything in there about getting a permit first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. Where exactly, in the Constitution, is it cited that a permit is required to exercise the 1st
amendment?
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. And would a pro bush war group have been treated that same way.
To me that is the biggest point here. Were they singled out for what they stood for, not for the press conference with no permit or gluing signs. And I agree with post 38 on this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. WHY?!? THE ENTIRE ARTICLE DOES NOT ADDRESS WHY - DID REPORTERS NOT EVEN ASK? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
56. Many many groups are supporting this rally, not just ANSWER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
59. You know the parralels of police attacking protestors and
arresting people just to be arresting them....are similar to the events in the 60's and 70's....Kent State anyone? Will an event like this be the catalyst? 73% want the war to end and are against this administration....these heavy handed tactics can only result in innocent people pursuing their right to gather and protest getting hurt or killed.....


but there will be something different this time around that 73% is comprised of Democrats, Former Republicans and others....this is the difference.....

I agree take your camara's and camcorders.....keep them honest....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
61. Can we call them Nazis yet?
The brownshirts and other stormtroopers regularly broke up non-Nazi rallies in the early 1930's in Germany. After awhile there was no need to any more since no one dared organize one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. We sure can and Blackwater will be the SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
63. What were the charges?
I haven't seen what the arrested were charged with.

DC is big on people getting a permit if they are going to have a large gathering. It helps the city know how much overtime they will be paying the police officers. And how much of that overtime they can recover from the Federal Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. This was in the middle of the day. The press conference would've been over in 20 minutes.
Overtime wouldn't even have figured in it.

Nothing that happened here justified having the police ride in on horseback and break things up, and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. So what were the charges? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #68
72. Not having a permit for the folding table they set up for the reporters' microphones
And temporarily putting up a few posters as a visual backdrop for the press conference.

And even YOU can't argue that either charge justifies forcible police intervention.

Stop blindly accepting the law enforcement version of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
65. Pathetic! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
66. Dictators don't want you to protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
71. As we used to say in the 60s
"Washington city authorities have said the posters had to come down because they were stuck on with adhesive that did not meet city regulations.

"At our demonstration today we were showing the media that the paste we use conforms to the rules," Becker said.

"One of our activists was making a speech when the police barged in and grabbed the podium. At that point, Tina Richards started to put up a poster, so they arrested her and two others."

FTP....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC