Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hutchison moves to block toll plan (Good act by a Republican)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:42 AM
Original message
Hutchison moves to block toll plan (Good act by a Republican)
Source: Houston Chronicle

Sept. 12, 2007, 11:40PM
Hutchison moves to block toll plan
Senate approves provision to delay interstate change

By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Texas would be barred from turning existing interstate highways into toll roads by a provision in a major spending bill approved Wednesday by the Senate.

The amendment by Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison would delay for one year a plan by Texas transportation officials to turn to toll roads. State officials have said they need the revenue to help defray an $86 billion shortfall in highway funding for the state.

Hutchison argued that it is unfair to turn highways already paid for by taxpayers into toll roads, and she has pledged to press for a permanent ban.

Her measure, tied to the one-year, $104.6 billion transportation and housing spending bill approved by the Senate, would be in effect only for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.

"Today we protected Texas taxpayers from paying twice for a highway," Hutchison said.



Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5130671.html





Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee I wonder how that happened?
"$86 billion shortfall in highway funding for the state".

It looks like she held off the toll road for one "WHOLE" year.

I hear she is not seeking re-election.


PS: JudyLynn, I am not criticizing your post. I always enjoy your posts, especially the ones about Central and South America. This one just gets my short hairs all riled up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not seeking re-election? What the hey? I heard her staff has had stories
about her ill treatment of them they've related to journalists somewhere along the road in the last year or so.

Maybe she's running out of people who will work with her, as she' getting a bad reputation for bad behavior at close range.

Never thought the day would come she'd throw in the towel. It seems to give her such a buzz wearing her kazillions of brightly colored suits and dresses to the Senate: a real clothes fanatic. She'll be all dressed up with nowhere to go.

As for the toll road, I've been looking at the Chronicle for a long time, and they've been discussing it for ages, too. Nearly passed out the first time I read about it. Unbelievable. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. The broken clock bitch.
Sorry to be so crude, but she is my senator, sad to say. Each and everytime I write to that halfwit, either pen and paper or e-mail, I get nothing but form letter responses. Forget calling, as soon as I say I'm from austin, I might as well give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Estel Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Rumor in Texas is
she is not seeking reelection because she is going to run for governor.

I don't think holding off tolls roads is such a great idea however. Just because taxpayers paid for a road once does not mean there are no more expenses. You can't go anywhere in Texas that they aren't repairing and upgrading the roads and bridges. The infrastructure in this country is disintegrating. Don't forgot the bridge that fell down a month or so ago in Minnesota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. god help us all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, that's something, anyway...
Expecting people to pay twice for the same thing just sucks... I assume they are already taxed to supply highway funding? Not the citizens' fault the state government can't live within its budget. Well, maybe it is, since the place is rife with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good step, now make it permanent for all states.
By keeping top marginal tax rates low, and by wasting $500 billion so far in Iraq, we ensure future generations will have to pay off the staggering national debt we are accumulating. Selling off public assets, which is another way to keep this borrow-and-spend train wreck going, is another way to make our descendants pick up the tab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. if she did something good look for an ulterior motive
she's repuke whore to the core
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. exactly, I would be impressed if she ever did anything that was
good for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I like that
Whore to the core. A very empty core I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. you know it, Baby Snooks
I cannot f***ing stand her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Delayed by one year... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. If they didn't want to maintain the roads that were built with federal tax dollars
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 08:20 AM by LiberalFighter
then they shouldn't had had them built.

If they don't want out of staters using their roads then don't build roads connecting to other states.


ON EDIT

For those that have toll roads I hope they don't receive federal tax dollars. Since the tolls are suppose to pay for the maintenance of those roads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good act by a Republican?
There's a catch somewhere. There always is with her. She is known in Dallas as Two Hats Hutchison. One the senator. The other the perfect little V&E wife. Vinson & Elkins. The law firm that brought us Enron and the Andy Fastow partnerships. And probably lots of other partnerships that somehow managed to never be investigated.

She voted against the Democratic amendment that would stop the beginning of the NAFTA "superhighway" and instead voted for Cornyn's amendment. Which would sort of, kind of stop it. To paraphrase Cornyn's summation of his amendment, we mustn't upset Mexico. Even if it means screwing the American people again.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/nation/5127184.html

Hutchison for some reason does well with Texas women including Texas Democratic women. Must be a Stepford Wives syndrome or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Highways are just another product of the corrupt military industrial complex.
And it needs to end if it takes so much money to maintain. Plus there is no way in hell it would help what it was originally intended for, emergency runways. It was about a bloated project as the thousands of nuclear warheads we manufactured over the past 40+ years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Did I mention FOD?
There is so much trash on these highways that even if they used it for a runway, the intakes would suck it all up and destroy the engine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. dup...
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 01:08 PM by SayWhatYo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I always heard the alternative use a runway was a myth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. it is a myth
a ridiculous one, when you think about it. Did the highways have a parallel military purpose? certainly, the easier movement of material and troops from one place to another. Of course, others can use it for that purpose as well. but the idea that they are designed as runways? please.

I think the economic benefit of highways far exceeds any perceived military benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Highway tolls sound like a "good" idea to reflect the true cost of motoring
I would rather have tolls than have my income or sales taxes pay for highway projects. Often, state and local governments have to contribute to get local projects funded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. indeed. I would lower gasoline taxes
and raise tolls, puts much more of the economic burden on those that can a: pass it on (like transportation firms) and b: want the convenience of highways. if you need to travel to get to work, lower gasoline taxes and higher tolls encourage you to find alternative methods for that trip, without penalizing you for being poor. If people want to drive alone and pay the tolls alone, more power to them, if they want to carpool, or take the bus, or drive back roads to avoid the tolls, they can do that as well. Gasoline taxes fine urbanites for the transportation needs of suburbanites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC