Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Next Test for Blackwater (Bidding for Anti-Narcotics Contract)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:01 AM
Original message
Next Test for Blackwater (Bidding for Anti-Narcotics Contract)
Source: Wall Street Journal

A Defense Department contract involving antidrug training missions may test the durability of the political controversy over Blackwater Worldwide's security work in Iraq.

The Moyock, N.C., company, which was involved in a September shooting in Baghdad that left 17 Iraqis dead, is one of five military contractors competing for as much as $15 billion over five years to help fight a narcotics trade that the government says finances terrorist groups.

Also competing for contracts from the Pentagon's Counter Narcoterrorism Technology Program Office are military-industry giants Raytheon Co., Lockheed Martin Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp., as well as Arinc Inc., a smaller aerospace and technology contractor.

The contracts are expected to be awarded as the need arises, so the Pentagon's level of concern about employing Blackwater will likely be measured over time and by whether the company wins leading roles or is shut out.

Companies competing for the work might be called on to develop detection or surveillance technology; train U.S. and foreign forces; or provide logistics, communications and information-technology systems, among other areas.



Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119492018449490830.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us



Would you trust Blackwater and Erik Prince not to actually aid the smuggling of drugs to finance the neo and theocons Black Ops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ohhh, are they going to provide cover for the "private" jets that fly drugs into the country too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. The war on drugs is big business.
It has always been about business...making money for the corporate scumbags and the military/prison industrial complex. It will never end..there is too much money to be made in criminalizing human frailties. No better way to control a population either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dantyrant Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not to mention all the drug money. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. exactly princess
humans a beautifully flawed creatures, not automatons. The government, being made up of the most severely flawed, knows this first hand. However, they are obedient to their corporate masters, as always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wait a sec.
Don't we have a division of the government that handles this sort of thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes. For now.
(But surely, the higher paid force is the superior one, no?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Those other companies are legitimate aerospace companies.
WTF are those merc scumbags doing here?

I guess their newly found billions are buying them a lot of influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
douglas9 Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Plan Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Blackwater MUST Be BLACKLISTED
They must never get another government contract, EVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. The bid process must fair--that is the most important factor.
If Blackwater wins the bid, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. lol...yeah, right... just like the War on Drugs is fair.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The war on drugs makes no sense at all. However, if all bidders are qualified,
the contract must go to the low bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. logic error...
We agree the WoD makes no sense at all. None. Given that, how can we proceed, logically, to stating that a contract (to do a thing that makes no sense) is only important insofar as it goes to the lowest bidder?

I don't get the logic there, sorry.

In my mind, because the WoD makes no sense, therefore this contract makes no sense (insofar as it is unconstitutional).

Not tryin' to flame. Just debating. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. My logic relates to the fact that we are outnumbered by those who favor the war on drugs;
as a result, means and methods will be employed in this so-called war. This in turn, necessitates a waste of resources.

One way to limit the waste of resources is to utilize the fair bid solicitation process. Until the argument against the WOD prevails, there is little else that can be done to limit the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. whether the 'want' it or not is irrelevant
it's unconstitutional to the core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. 90% of what the fedgov has done since 1861 is unconstitutional.
Nowadays, no one cares about the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. I wonder if they have any My Honor is Loyalty t-shirts for sale in the Blackwater store?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm buying throw-down crack pipe futures
Presuming, of course, that Blackwater brings the same brand of expertise to the "war" on drugs that it did to the "war" on terror.

Why is our only solution to any problem always "war"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC