Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge puts Kucinich in Nevada debate (MSNBC debate)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:50 PM
Original message
Judge puts Kucinich in Nevada debate (MSNBC debate)
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 07:34 PM by ursi
Source: Associated Press

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A Nevada judge says Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich must be included in Tuesday’s candidates’ debate in Nevada.

Senior Clark County District Court Judge Charles Thompson says if Kucinich is excluded, he’ll issue an injunction stopping the televised debate.
The judge sided with a lawyer for the Ohio congressman, who says debate host MSNBC at first invited Kucinich to take part and then told him last week he couldn’t.

Read more: http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080114/NEWS19/80114039



The lawsuit is available at this link:

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/global/story.asp?s=7622444
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. freaking awsome
GO DK its your birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
61. How to answer strange questions.
"That is certainly a strange question, and it's Americans like you asking these questions that make our democracy great. Now, about my anti-war stance." *talk about antiwar stance for time limit.*

If interrupted, immediately interrupt them and ask them to please not interrupt your answers, then thank them for their consideration.

"That's not..."

"Excuse me please, I would ask you _SIR_ to please not interrupt me, thanks for for not being rude."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. ???????????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. took me a couple reads
they're saying what DK should tell the moderator when he/she asks him one of those bizarre questions they throw at candidates, and how DK should focus on the war despite whatever they ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
114. a-yup
Good answer, buckrogers!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #61
78. Welcome to DU!
be sure to put who is saying each sentence so people can follow your storyline.

I agree, that's what DK should do - it'd be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #61
154. Nice first post!
Welcome to DU, buckrogers1965.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
109. DK has experience-
EXECUTIVE experience Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great. It's only right since he's on the ballot to be included. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended
DK rocks! :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kucinich deserves to be heard.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. He deserves to be heard, the voters deserve a real debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And NBC deserves a slap in the face. But now they won't ask him any questions. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
67. Oh they may ask him about UFOs. They will still railroad him by
either no questions or stupid ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
68. self delete
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 09:00 PM by FREEWILL56
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, GE is not gonna be happy. Don't they own the judges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Obviously this judge isn't owned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
140. They are appealing this decision to the Nevada Supreme court
I am sure they will soon find one. If not Russert/ Williams will really be out to get Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shameful that it had to come to this. Go Kooch, you crazy elf!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Harry Reid can go fuck-off! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. True story! I am convinced Reid and his pals were behind this in Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
153. What makes you convinced of this?
I am not arguing, I just can't keep up anymore. Do you have any links, or is it gut instinct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Awesome...
about time I read something positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow!
A fair judge in the US of A!

Yea for Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. ...especially a fair judge in Nevada that isn't influenced by Harry Reid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. Too bad, so sad
that Harry Reid missed one.

NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. can't get enough of this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Victory!!
I hope he totally slams Hill-bama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. finally some good news!
debates aren't the same without him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. WOWEEE!!!! OMG. Fan-f---ing-tastic!!!!!
You show 'em, Dennis!!!

Now let's hope the people running the debate let him answer some questions and put his two cents in so he can be HEARD!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. This is a major slap in the face of the MSM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. So they'll put him on the stage
The judge can't make Brian Williams and Little Russ ask Dennis any questions. They can just stick him up on that stage and treat him like a potted plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
112. It's written in his lawsuit
that he has to be included and given a fair amount of time in the debate. I'm sure Kucinich knew even if allowed to debate, they would try to give him the two minutes they usually give him. That doesn't stop them from asking a UFO question, or some other idiotic question posed to ridicule and undermine him. I wish people would wake up in this country and realize the true voice of "change" is the one candidate that corporate America doesn't want you to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #112
116. its not the basis for the decision
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 12:16 AM by onenote
He didn't win on the basis of his "equal opportunities" claim. He won on a contract claim. And all that means is that he has a right to be on stage. No guarantee of anything else.

And if I was going to have to place a bet, its that NBC appeals and wins before tomorrow's debate.

(I should add that I think it was wrong of NBC to change the criteria for inclusion in the debate late in the game and that I have no problem with DK being included...I just doubt that a court decision ordering his inclusion is going to stand..and if it does, you can bet the ranch that in the future, when networks invite candidates to participate in the debate, the invitation will make clear that it can be rescinded for any reason at any time...if these things are going to be treated as contracts the networks will write them like contracts).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #116
144. You're probably right
NBC has the money to hire the best lawyers who will most likely succeed with the appeal. But I think it's PR suicide for NBC to even go after an appeal. The American people see right through GE's agenda in excluding Kucinich, the only anti-war candidate. GE's military contracts are well known by now, and the public will see this second exclusion of Kucinich, as an affront to their intelligence and democracy.

This country needs to take the elections out of the hands of corporate thugs, with campaign finance reform, and debates aired only on PBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #144
148. You're very optimistic
I wonder how many people even know that NBC is owned by GE, let alone being able to connect the dots like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #148
158. Good point. I forgot
to take into account the many people voting for whatever MSM spoon feeds them instead of searching out the truth online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Jolly good show, Judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Woo hoooo!!!!!!
Great day for Democrats! Great day for Kucinich! Great day for America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. Do you support reparations? Can you tell us more about the UFO?
It only works if he gets the right questions. They will seek to make him look over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. one way or the other, it is still a win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
106. LOL!
Yep. Sad but true.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
145. He should say, "I'm not going to answer that question, which is designed to
marginalize my campaign. I'm going to talk about things that are of concern to the American people"--and then launch into a paragraph about how to stop the war, and why it isn't being being stopped, though 70% of the American people oppose it, and maybe say something about the VERY non-transparent vote counting system in Nevada, run on "trade secret," proprietary programming code, owned and controlled by a private corporation (Sequoia) with ties to the Republican Party, with NO paper trail, and NO verifiability AT ALL. This latter is especially relevant, in view of his request for a recount in New Hampshire.

In fact, he could make a cause celebre out our non-transparent vote counting system all over the country, and say that he's going to stay in the race, and challenge it everywhere.

He doesn't have to accept stupid questions. He can pause, briefly, and stare them down, and let the silence speak for itself, and then either make a quick joke out of it, or attack it directly and move quickly to a meaningful topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
118. What you said!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Way to go Dennis!!! eom K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. Woo hoo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. too bad for hillary
she'll have three "on-the-up-and-up" people debating her now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Apologies for my dupe above in LBNews
I tried to self-delete but it wouldn't accept it for some reason... nice job getting the jump on me. lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No problem! It's great news!!! I love it that the MSM is getting slapped in the face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I was so excited by the news, I forgot to check the recent LBN posts carefully
my hands were shaking so much from adrinalin I could hardly type.

This is such a healthy thing to happen right now .... not for a particular candidate, but for
America .. it gives me hope and shivers down my spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
56. I totally understand! Big hug to ya! Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. I AM SO GLAD TO HEAR THIS!! I'M SHOUTING IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS!
they'd better get some good questions to him or MSNBC can really go FUCK OFF

i want to see the letter REinviting him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. I know.. me too. It's a great day for democracy in America.
not because of any candidate .. it's just such a lovely example of our checks and balances system actually
WORKING for once... it gives me great hope for it catching on like wildfire ... when that magical tipping
point happens like in V for Vendetta, or in Venezuela when they tried to depose Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. Judge Grants Kucinich Entry to NV Debate
Source: Associated Press

Judge Grants Kucinich Entry to NV Debate

43 minutes ago

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A Nevada judge said Monday that Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich must be included in Tuesday's candidates' debate in Nevada.

Senior Clark County District Court Judge Charles Thompson said if Kucinich is excluded, he'll issue an injunction stopping the televised debate.

The judge sided with a lawyer for the Ohio congressman, who says debate host MSNBC at first invited Kucinich to take part and then told him last week he couldn't.

A lawyer for the network said MSNBC decided to go with the top three candidates after the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries.

The judge called it a matter of fairness and said Nevada voters will benefit if they hear from more than just Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards.

The cable network and the Democratic Party are calling the 9 p.m. EST debate a chance to hear issues from Nevada's minority communities. Tim Russert and Brian Williams are moderating.

Read more: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gDnNS8D2ehuX_-DVhFZ3z3WK1vtgD8U5V07G0




Good for Dennis. Our democracy is stronger for this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Rec'd. He should be included. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. What are the debate rules this time?
Can NBC simply ignore Kooch? I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. 5' 8" podiums.
Edwards and Obama go mano y mano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Lol. And I'm only 4'11.75! n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
101. Thanks! I needed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. not sure, but this should be a debate not to be missed
what with this decision forcing some fairness into the debate .. i love it.

wonder if it will be politely "not mentioned" or if it is mentioned, how that will play.

hoo-ahh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Good. I hate those three-person debates.
It just isn't right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #37
141. I need time out from
that agent of change crap and denegrating Martin Luther King. Is this the best we can do. Kucinich is needed to bring substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #141
142. I agree
Kucinich is the voice of the people, and the only candidate offering real change with his single payer not-for-profit health care plan. I find it ironic that the other candidates evoke Martin Luther King, yet one of MLK's greatest quotes is a ringing endorsement to the morality of Kucinich's health care plan..

"Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #142
143. Appreciating you posting the MLK quote on healthcare.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:55 AM by cyclezealot
It really resignates. And why the media hates Kucinich. Instead of denegrating MLK, Hillary Clinton need ask herself, what would MLK do and say as to our present day problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #143
159. That would take insight
and empathy, two things MLK had, but Clinton doesn't have a clue about. She's nothing more than a shrewd politician crying tears to show her vulnerable side to appeal to voters who think she's too robotic. Clinton is a corporate lackey, and will cater to the powers behind her election if she's president. That's why she's earned the name Bush-Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #142
157. And proposed cuts to the defense budget -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiocracyhell Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #157
160. Which will cost GE billions
in lost military contracts. GE's whole empire will suffer severe financial consequences if Kucinich is elected. Yet NBC say's their decision to exclude Kucinich from the debates, has nothing to do with their parent company, GE. Riiiiiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. We lost alot when we lost Fairness
doctrine.

This is a great result...especially if the mods can stop playing to the GOP gallery and stop asking stupid questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Good, all candidates have to be heard....
a nice victory for Kucinich. Now I hope Russert and Williams give him some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #41
88. All of us here should write msnbc and demand they give him fair treatment IMO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. It's understandable that the corrupt media
doesn't want DK in the debates. But it's a damn sad day when it takes a judge to tell the Democratic Party to respect democracy. We have a long way to go to take this Party back for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. It wasn't the Dem. Party, as i understand it, it was MSNBC
or at least that's what the news release sez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #47
80. That's a cop-out
the Party and/or the other candidates could put a stop to this anti-democratic BS if they chose to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Too bad a "news" agency had to be sued into it. Tsk. Tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Will Keith O. cover this?? That should be interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. This is great news and I hope KO covers it tonight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peggy Day Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
71. Just watched KO, he had pictures of the debate candidates
and there was no mention or picture of DK.
I hope it's true. He needs to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
110. KO added very quickly, but a later reference to the debates only showed the 3.
At first I thought I imagined it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #46
137. he covered it in one sentence--and he said nbc was appealing the ruling. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. I know one person here who won't like this
And I love it. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. i`ve read a few who think dennis does`t belong ....to those-->
don`t be a :cry: baby...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. Hoo Boy!
That will liven up the debate. If they give him just a little time and he manages to bring up the biggies the others are ignoring, even if they don't respond, it will be great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. you can read Dennis' lawsuit at this link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
54. How sensational is that! It will change the whole dynamic of the debate.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 07:48 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
His opponents have a lot of problems ahead of them, working out what lines they are going to tout, in the face of his challenging questions to them. If they lie too baldly it will look very bad. If the moderator tries to cut him short all the time, that, too, will look very bad.

The person best equipped for a situation like that is Barak. Like Blair he's a master at spinning a line. Only much better. He can make the most empty, vapid, meaningless sentences sound like the most moving exhortations ever delivered by John Kennedy or even Martin Luther King. He has such natural dignity, such presence (Blair alas was known for a kind of absence, rather than presence. A light-weight, wheedling "Listen with Mother" tone, Britain's own Bill Schneider), and when Barak, even as a mere aspirant for the presidency, begins to speak, those deep, reassuring nut-brown tones (nothing to with racism here) simply confirm that he almost certainly conveys an impression of greater dignity and presence than any Republican President other than Abraham Lincoln ever could have had, and, in those terms, would have been be at least a match for any Democratic President. He would be the ultimate King Player in a Shakespearean play - alas a tragedy, by the look of it. The conflict between the visual and auditory impressions he leaves, and the emptiness of what he actually enunciates, means I can no longer watch him on the box without involuntarily laughing. You can only hope that his followers wise up, or that he loses his voice.

I don't know how Hillary will cope, at all, though, there again, she didn't seem to feel shamed by the points made by John Edwards in an earlier debate. In the end, I suppose, to Republicans and DINOs, it would take a lot more than truth to really unsettle them. But that doesn't mean that they won't be thoroughly exposed by our hardy, wee gallowglasses. Have at thee, knaves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
55. fuck you msnbc---you don`t own the OUR airwaves
i think i just may listen to this dog and pony show just to see how they fuck over dennis with ufo questions..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
57. Does anyone know the times .. by time zone ... that this will be shown??
I tried to google for the info myself, but came up short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #57
77. I searched and came up with it right away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #77
115. Amazing. Dennis's face is on the bottom of that very page
Meet the Candidates
Dennis Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. Great, Great news. It's DK's voice we need, not necessarily his winning a race rigged by money.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 08:04 PM by Stevepol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Just heard on KO's that NBC plans to appeal. They'll have to do it quick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
60. Good n//t
ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
64. My concern as an Edwards supporter wanting to see this debate happen
is the possibility that they don't include Kucinich. The Judge says he will stop the debate. Could be monkey-shit games between the Judge and corporate M$M?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muyojoe Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
65. ONLY HALF THE JUDGES ARE WORTH A SHIT,
and when they get it right, it is awesome! I'm glad, the crazy little ufo guy has some good ideas. I actually would feel better about my party and America's future, if he was winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
66. Alright legal beagles - what's the next step for Dennis when
NBC appeals the State Judge's ruling with a Federal Judge?
?
?
?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
100. The next step will be to shut up, hopefully
We're far beyond the point now where the single digit-percenters need to have a place at the table. DK's 15 minutes ran out awhile ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. Uh, bite me?
Dennis brings issues to the table that few (and in some cases NO, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH) of the remaining candidates want to talk about.

It may not serve any of the top three candidate's interests for Dennis to be there, but it sure as hell serves the voting public!

Or would you rather we stick to the beauty contest, he said/she said narrative and ignore policy and substance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #105
146. I'll pass, thanks. Tinfoil hat wearers taste funny.
Dennis brings issues to the table that the entire country largely doesn't care about. If they did, he would get within spitting distance of double digits. :)

Face the facts; he does not resonate with a significant portion of the voting public. I'm sure he serves his district's interests well as they keep voting him back in. But the national stage? Not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #146
161. Where the hell have you been??
<i>Dennis brings issues to the table that the entire country largely doesn't care about.</i>

:wtf:

Dennis brings issues to the table that the MSM so completely IGNORE that the entire country largely doesn't KNOW about. His positions (not his rankings in the beauty contest/fundraising race) also match up with those of most Americans better than ANY candidate.

"Face the facts"???

He doesn't "resonate" only because hardly anyone has been allowed to HEAR him--in the debates he's been in (none on network TV, BTW), they don't ask him any questions!!

Good grief. Take your corporate media blinders off and get a clue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #100
113. Welcome to Fucking Ignore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #100
138. Welcome to ignore! 2.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #100
139. I sense deep hostilities.
Is it his love of mankind that pushes your buttons or his uncompromising honesty?

Don't answer that, I don't give a rat's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #100
149. Were you watching the 2004 Democratic debates?
The debates where Kerry and Edwards continued until the very last debate to make excuses for the IWR while Kucinich and Sharpton were the only ones telling the truth about the IWR, Iraq, Hussein, WMD, and Bush's manipulation of facts?

That is why alternative voices are critical to such debates.

Without those voices, the population gets fed the status quo, party-line bullshit that does nothing to create a genuine debate.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #149
156. For fuck's sake, you are smply unwilling or unable to get it
There have been a long, long string of primary debates where a multitude of voices have been heard. Kucinich has had ample opportunity to deliver his message to America. Guess what? America yawned.

Move the fuck on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #66
119. argue his case. but I wouldn't bet on his winning
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 12:19 AM by onenote
What else can he do but respond to the appeal. If the judge's ruling was based on the Communications Act, I'm 100 percent certain DK will lose because its well established that the FCC has primary jurisdiction over equal opportunities cases under sec 315 of the Communications Act. If its a state law contract claim, DK can try to argue that the feds have no jurisdiction. And FWIW, I think that NBC will appeal to the state Supreme Court, not to federal court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Hail good jurist!!!
And fight the bastids Mr Kucinich!
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
70. Brilliant; I hear they know how to honor a contract in Nevada. Guess they don't at NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
72. Good news is always welcome.
If he's there, I'll be tuning in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunkie0913 Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
73. Good
There is still a remnant of fairness in this country. We can be sure they will try to keep Dennis silent even while on stage. I hope he interrupts everyone and talks over the time limit. Say IMPEACH or JOBS or HEALTHCARE at every moment of silence, make a spectacle out of yourself. UFO's @$$ make 'em talk about something worthwhile, your insistence to discuss relevant issues in detail even if it makes the big 3 and the media shills cringe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
75. Excellent!!....
....now go forth Dennis, and kick some ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
76. Good to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
79. great! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
81. Love seeing a judge slap down the friggin' MSM!
Good for you, Judge Thompson!

And good for Dennis!

This will make the debate more interesting for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
82. Awsome! Just Awsome!
Not that they'll ask him any questions but when people see him on their tv and say "hey, who's that guy", maybe they'll try to find out.

But a victory all the same.
And a big F U to the MIC and the M$ Propaganda Complex!

Dennis is a scrappy little dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
83. Thank God for Activist Judges (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
84. Go, DK! We all benefit with him in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
85. Anyone see this? MSNBC directly linking to Hillary Clinton Campaign
This story (link below) points out the fact that the MSNBC story about her appearance on Meet The Press includes a direct link to her campaign where visitors are asked to donate.

http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2008/01/breaking-msnbc.html

Here's the MSNBC story (link below). If you click on the name Sen. Hillary Clinton in the heading of the article, it takes you directly to her website:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/

Is this customary? Maybe it is, for all I know. Do they do this will all candidates (when they write their name in an article, the link takes the visitor right to the candidate's website)? Is it not unusual? I don't know one way or the other but I don't think I ever recall seeing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #85
92. That ain't right and although I didn't go through all of the candidates
so far she is the only one that gets a link straight to her home website to get contributions. FOUL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flasoapbox Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
86. SUCK IT, NBC!!!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
87. sweet Sweet SWEET!!
:bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
89. Very good news! kinda surprised msnbc didn't try to cut Edwards, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashlarah Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #89
124. ABC is planning to do just that
George Steph. said on Sunday they would have debates just between the candidates that had won a caucus or primary. They probably figure Romney will win in Michigan, so they can safely impose these rules with the intent to narrow the Dem race to two candidates. That is what you hear over and over on corporate media - the Dems are down to a two person race. Of course, they have been manufacturing that all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
90. YEAH, BAY-BAY!
It takes a lot to make me smile on a Monday. Thanks for posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
91. Hoooooraaaaaaaaay for Dennis. . .

BUG THE HELL OUT OF 'EM, DENNIS. . .



. . .YOU ARE OUR TRUTHSEEKING GADFLY !




:yourock: :applause: :headbang: :applause: :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
93. Kucinich may have just become the historical firewall to keep Edwards...
in the debates, and in the race to stay. After Obama and Clinton are finished with their race war, Edwards will be left standing as the Presidential choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
94. After the last week, I'm actually glad. He's going to nail Hillary to a stake, you just watch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TripleD Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
95. MSNBC is appealing the decision
"We disagree with the judge's decision and are filing an appeal," said a statement provided by Jeremy Gaines, a vice president for MSNBC, sponsor of Tuesday night's debate. Gaines said the parent network would seek an immediate hearing before the Nevada Supreme Court.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gDnNS8D2ehuX_-DVhFZ3z3WK1vtgD8U61MM81

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. An Immediate Hearing??
Can't they wait in line like everyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BRLIB Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
97. Fuckin Corporate Media should not be allowed to host any
debates.

They are the Crooks and Liars and need to be broken up if not abolished.

Only NFPs (not for profits) should have any action here.

They'll turn this two party sham into a horse race no matter what the Rethug is and then shove that POS down your throat at the last minute.

I say cancel all of your "TV machines" and tell them to go to HELL!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
98. SUCK ON THAT, CHUCK TODD. Ha!!!!
I love it. That smug asshole doesn't get to do the bidding of his defense contractor overlords.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
99. WHOOOOOHOOOOOO!!1
now that is some sweet good news, go get'm DK!

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newburgh Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
102. It shouldn't have come to this. If any of the other candidates demanded
as much or abstain, as it should be if any of them believed in a free press, then it either wouldn't have gone on or would be cancelled. This just proves how chickenshit the other three candidates are and that they can't even work within their own party for a mutual change of something that is drastically wrong with our country: MSM control. If this is the what is on the horizon with any of these candidates, we're all just wasting our time. And if it was the Nevada Democrats who caused the exclusion, then they need to change their leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
103. I agree
Dennis Kucinich has a right to be in the debate.... no matter which candidate you support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
104. Best news in a long time!!!!
Get 'em Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
107. UPDATE!!! NBC/MSNBC: 212-664-4444 NBC to appeal decision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #107
122. Those FUCKERS.
If corporations are considered persons for the purposes of law, doesn't this amount to one single person telling the rest of us in the country that THEY, and only they, have the right to decide who we will hear and who we will not?

Even if you don't support Kucinich- even if you want to see him bow out- this push by MSNBC to keep him out of the debate should give you pause. Between this and the blackout on Edwards, it should be obvious to anyone with two neurons to rub together that this is a very blatant case of corporate interference (not merely influence) in the electoral process.

Congress should go into emergency session right now to fix this by mandating equal time. It's the only way.

This entire situation is a textbook case for reinstating the fairness doctrine- among other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #122
123. the law already contains an equal time provision
It just doesn't apply to news coverage or debates (among other things). In addition, there is an open question as to whether it applies to cable networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #122
127. We've known that the media has had a bias for years if not
decades, but it is becoming even more blatant.

Edwards has been given quite a bit of time, he was always one of the top three media candidates. Maybe he is getting less than he used to, but he is still on TV everyday. Imagine if the media had given the same amount of time to Biden, Dodd, Gravel or Richardson. The two who really challenged the MIC were Gravel and Kucinich and I'm sure many are glad to see them silenced.

From the start this was always about the top three candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #127
129. But that's my point.
"Top three"... as defined by whom?

I wonder what would happen if we banned television electioneering, leaving radio and the press as the only option. I'm starting to think leaving television out of it entirely (perhaps it's too powerful a medium to be used in the political process?) might actually end up being a benefit.

Thinking out loud here. It's obvious something needs to be done....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #129
132. Yes something needs to be done, our country is sinking fast
and we cannot blame it all on the Repubs IMO.

They blame us for a few things as well and they should.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #132
133. So what happens when the only possible solutions
are seen as "too radical"?

Because, after all, "impeachment" is off the table...

(You can substitute whatever regulatory action you like for 'impeachment' if you wish...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #133
136. We still have our votes which have been taken for granted. If
someone or some party wants my vote they have to earn it. Otherwise we can write letters, make phone calls and protest but none of that has helped in any significant way. Of course we always get a few bones to chew on to keep us happy.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #107
126. I doubt they have the time... it's not really an appeal process but a writ process,
and they're not likely to get the local appellate court to issue a writ reversing the trial judge's order before the debates start at 6:00 p.m. tomorrow.

A writ proceeding is a lot quicker than an appeal, but not as quick as a hearing on a TRO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #126
130. Do you ever get the impression that the bureaucracy in the US
gets things done slowly, if at all, on purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #126
134. not necessarily
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:35 AM by onenote
Courts can move pretty quickly when the circumstances require.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
108. Awesome, viva la Kucinich (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
111. Flip side of "equal protection?" Equal representation, perhaps? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
117. YES! YES! YES! n/t!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
120. I guess my email (to MSNBC) insisting on Kucinich included worked
either it was that or Tarot


Here's the text:

To MSNBC Letters to the Editor:

"You can count me as one of those viewers who are DISGUSTED that you would change the ground rules for inclusion in the debates specifically so as to exclude Dennis Kucinich. Including him means that issues like single-payer health care coverage, which none of the other remaining debate participants plan to pursue, will be advocated. It appears that excluding him was more out of a desire to exclude the content of his views, which differ from the 'top three' candidates than it was out of any purported concern to improve the debates and help sharpen voters decisions at the ballot box. I also find it difficult to fathom why six Democrats were, until recently, OK to have in the same debate, but now four is too many."

from .... Cloudy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
121. Damn those activist judges!
Give 'em hell, Dennis! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #121
125. Actually, this is just a judge. They don't get called "activist" until the GOP calls them that for
ruling on anything in a way they don't like because it doesn't fit their extremist agendas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #125
131. I think d_b's tongue was planted firmly in cheek with that comment
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
128. YEA!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umtalal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
135. YES, ALL CANDIDATES DESERVE TO BE HEARD. HEAR THAT MSNBC???n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
147. Beautiful Fucking Beautiful!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
150. Kucinich hard to silence, NBC learns
Source: Las Vegas Sun

A District Court judge Monday ordered NBC to include Democratic presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich in tonight’s debate in Las Vegas after the candidate complained that the network had breached its contract and undermined the public interest by barring him from the stage.

Judge Charles Thompson said he would file an injunction to stop the 6 p.m. debate if it does not include Kucinich. NBC said it will appeal today, setting the stage for more last-minute legal maneuvering before the debate, which is scheduled to air on the local NBC affiliate and on MSNBC, an NBC cable network.

Bill McGaha, the Ohio congressman’s Las Vegas attorney, said the network should “let the people decide who they want to vote for. Don’t exclude a candidate. Let the voters do that. That’s what the process is for.”

According to the lawsuit, Kucinich was invited Wednesday to participate in the debate with the three front-runners New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. Kucinich qualified because he placed among the top four Democratic presidential candidates in a national news media poll conducted after the Iowa caucus, McGaha said.

Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jan/15/lawsuit/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. Good for Dennis
I'm sick of the media changing their rules at the last minute so as to exclude the candidates they don't want to have the people hear. Kindly remember that in polls, a majority of Americans want out of Iraq and also want single payer non profit health insurance--issues that Dennis is adamant about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #151
152. I hear you brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
155. glad the judge felt fairness was appropriate...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC