Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Has No Comprehensive E-Mail Archive (System Used by Clinton Admin Was Scrapped)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:50 AM
Original message
White House Has No Comprehensive E-Mail Archive (System Used by Clinton Admin Was Scrapped)
Source: WP

System Used by Clinton Was Scrapped

For years, the Bush administration has relied on an inadequate archiving system for storing the millions of e-mails sent through White House servers, despite court orders and statutes requiring the preservation of such records, according to documents and technical experts.

President Bush's White House early on scrapped a custom archiving system that the Clinton administration had adopted under a federal court order. From 2001 to 2003, the Bush White House also recorded over computer backup tapes that provided a last line of defense for preserving e-mails, even though a similar practice landed the Clinton administration in legal trouble.

As a result, several years' worth of electronic communication may have been lost, potentially including e-mails documenting administration actions in the run-up to the Iraq war.

White House officials said last week that they have "no reason to believe" that any e-mails were deliberately destroyed or are missing. But over the past year, they have acknowledged problems with archiving, saving and finding e-mails dating from early in the administration until at least 2005.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/21/AR2008012102070.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wanton disregard for the law. What a shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. kinda like they knew in advance they were gonna need
that out.

of course this is the admin that got in by thievery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. "That's What They'd LIKE You to Believe!"
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 11:08 AM by Demeter


CLICK ON THIS LINK FOR THE FULL EFFECT!
&p=maxwell+smart&type=jpeg&no=66&tt=802&oid=61321c0d2a10cda4&ei=UTF-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. White House officials said last week that they have "no reason to believe" that any e-mails were del
:eyes:
And they say it with a straight face.

the thing that gets me is how many just accept the bullshit:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. nobody has to design an email archive system
They are available commercially. I work on one that works well with both Exchange servers and Notes. My company is EMC, but other companies also sell these.

There is no excuse for a large organization not to have a good email archive system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. "...even though even though a similar practice landed the Clinton administration in legal trouble"
So WHY THE F*CK wouldn't the same land the Shrub Administration IN LEGAL TROUBLE TOO, instead of "no
reason to believe" that any e-mails were deliberately destroyed or are missing
???? Ya know???
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a shocker
I guess this administration doesn't want to be caught with any "Nixon tapes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why burn papers or erase files when you don't have to?
they were very obviously thinking ahead.

they didn't want an "uncomfortable moment" like nixon did with the infamous missing 16 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. 18 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Duh, right LOL I stand corrected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. NSA has 'em, I'll bet.
Since they've been illegally snagging all Internet traffic for god knows how long, I'm sure they have it. You just have to know the double-secret magic word to ask for them.

We'll see them in about fifty years, and by then nobody will be surprised at what they say--if anyone's left to read them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. none of this while the television Media is busy stirring up racial tensions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. All Hail the Paperless Office
At least shredders make enough noise to attract attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC