Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Panel Approves $542B Defense Authorization

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:23 PM
Original message
Senate Panel Approves $542B Defense Authorization
Source: WaPo

Senate Panel Approves $542B Defense Authorization
Bill Would Restrict U.S. Spending on Big Infrastructure Projects in Iraq

Thursday, May 1, 2008; 3:59 PM

The Senate Armed Services Committee has approved a $542.5 billion defense authorization bill for next year that increases military pay, funds new weapons systems and requires Iraq to assume the cost of large-scale infrastructure projects.

The panel last night unanimously approved the package, which would fund the fiscal 2009 "baseline budget" of the Defense Department and national security programs of the Energy Department, Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), the committee's chairman, announced today. An additional $70 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan "for some months beyond the current fiscal year" will be covered by a separate supplemental appropriations bill, he said.

The proposed legislation prohibits the Defense Department from using funds authorized by the act to pay for large-scale infrastructure projects in Iraq, which are defined as those costing more than $2 million. It also calls for the United States to begin negotiating with the Iraqi government a cost-sharing agreement to ensure that "Iraq pays for the training, equipping and sustaining of the Iraqi security forces" and covers the costs associated with armed groups of U.S.-allied civilians known as the "Sons of Iraq."

"American taxpayers are paying for too many things . . . in Iraq that the Iraqis ought to pay for out of their surplus" oil revenues, Levin told a news conference this morning. With crude oil fetching nearly $120 a barrel, Iraq is expected to reap about $70 billion in oil revenue this year, and both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have complained that the Baghdad government should take on more of the costs now borne by cash-strapped American taxpayers.



Read more: Bill Would Restrict U.S. Spending on Big Infrastructure Projects in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am so sad for my children. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Levin talking out of both sides of his mouth
a typical 'democrat'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow. A whole one sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Carl Levin is another DINO Enabler of the Bush Criminals
And the Cheney NEOCON War Criminals

Shame on him.

In the next few days dozens of children will die in the world as a result of his Cowardice.

I'm sure his full stomach, fat wallet and expansive girth are COMFORTABLE in his expandable waist trousers tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. shameful....
The American love affair with militarism continues unabatted. They will destroy our children's future for MIC profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I totally agree. And as sfexpat2000 said above, I too am so sad for my children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. yup, just throw more of OUR $ at the killing, war machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Isn't this how Raygun was SUPPOSED to have defeat the Soviet Union?
By getting them to spend themselves into the grave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. 524B baseline
that means it starts there and goes up.

we're going broke enriching the MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. How is authorizing $542B RESTRICT spending?
Edited on Thu May-01-08 05:21 PM by Phred42
Orwellian bullshit.

This chart is before the above figure is added



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. It is no wonder Republicans are so afraid of Iran and Venezuela
Look at how much they spend on Defense......Scary.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. Link to article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC