Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain’s victory not a complete one in Pennsylvania

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:11 AM
Original message
McCain’s victory not a complete one in Pennsylvania
Source: The Daily and Sunday Review; Towanda Pa.

Assured of the Republican presidential nomination months ago, Arizona Sen. John McCain cruised to a dominating victory in the party’s Pennsylvania primary election last week.But a lot of Republicans didn’t vote for him.

More than a quarter voted for either U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who had 15.9 percent of the vote, or former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who had 11.3 percent. McCain had the other 72.8 percent.

Paul and Huckabee, listed on the ballot long before McCain earned enough delegates to presumptively claim the nomination, remained there for the Pennsylvania primary.

It suggests that a portion of GOP voters were dissatisfied with Mr.McCain as the Republican nominee, raising fears they might stay home or even back a Democrat in the fall election.




Read more: http://www.thedailyreview.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19654745&BRD=2276&PAG=461&dept_id=465049&rfi=6



Funny. . This isn't getting much play in that damn "librul media".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which is exactly why all this hand wringing over the Wright "outrage" is ridiculous.
The Republicans do not like McCain. They will stay home unless they get to vote against Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bull flaming cookies.
They don't like McCain. They won't like him one bit more if Hillary is running.

The sexist bigotry you're talking about right now is projection. You're writing about what you would do in their place.

About what you HOPE they'll do...

Another charmer for Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. please don't hijack my thread. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:42 AM
Original message
No, I'm not being sexist. I'm being realistic.
All those diseffected Republican assholes that despise Hillary who would otherwise sit home will come out in droves against her, they've been conditioned to it. They'll suck it up and vote McCain if it meant they can thwart their arch nemesis. We need to stop pretending here. They will sit by and just let it happen if it's anyone else.

For the record, and not giving a fuck whether you believe or not, I couldn't care less about her gender. I just want the best person for the country. I wanted Clark or Gore to run and supported Edwards before all this. I am by no means an Obamaniac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. please don't hijack my thread. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't think that I have.
I'm just stating what I think the implications of your post are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. The other quarter switched party affiliation and voted for Clinton. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Republican party has a Ron Paul problem
and they don't have a means to fix it. Everybody decries the lengthy Dem Primary, but at least each state gets a voice. The people in PA who are Republicans were essentially told that McCain is the nominee, so deal with it. Those Ron Paul supporters won't be voting for McCain. Ron Paul's political philosophy is the complete opposite of McCain's. I think this is great news for Democrats in general. The Republican Party undermined and tried to sabotage Ron Paul's candidacy, but his supporters aren't going to cooperate with their corrupt party system. There is some video on youtube of the TX and NV Republican conventions showing an undemocratic bias against Ron Paul supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes! Yes they do. In Nevada the whole Rep. convention was SHUT DOWN
to prevent the Paulies from taking over. The Paulies had the numbers. This story is getting NO PLAY in the press.. just like Paul's huge money reserves did not buy him airtime or access to the Repug debates before McCain was crowned...

Corpomedia will NOT highlight any dissension in the ranks of their wholly owned subsidiary, the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ron Paul opened my eyes
to the corruption of the GOP. The Republican Party along with the Fixed Noise Network decided that they couldn't allow any Republican candidates to participate if that didn't support the Iraq War. Here's part of a Faux News Debate where they didn't even try to hide their disdain for Ron Paul:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cP1mG0Ep7yA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. I didn't vote for Kerry in the 2004 primary, and he had the nomination sewed up . . .
By the time California voted in 2004, Kerry was indisputably the nominee, but I voted for Kucinich because I was dissatisfied with Kerry and wanted to send a message about the direction I wanted Kerry to take his campaign. There was never a thought I'd stay home for the general election, or worse back someone other than the Democratic nominee; I just wanted to send a message about the type of government I prefer. So all these people who didn't vote for McCain don't, necessarily, signal that these Republican voters will abandon their nominee. It could just be, like me, they'd prefer their party platform have a different emphasis than it presently appears it will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC