|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 09:18 AM Original message |
Supreme Court upholds anti-child pornography law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. It's actually the "innocent" pictures a grandmother may email to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. While I don't watch much TV anymore, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I think because infants are very rarely seen as sexual objects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 11:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I think it's wrong to circulate even innocent pics of naked kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. So what is the argument here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think the point is the law needs to be re-written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. While child pornography is despicable, that doesn't mean any law against it is valid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. And Souter and Ginsburg dissented. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Which means that Stevens and Breyer went along with the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. The law has to be written in a way that doesn't target innocents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluebellbaby (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Now you can be arrested for your remarks....you are discussing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. I can't help but wonder if the law isn't intentionally vague. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. ding ding ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. See the opinion below, even the dissent does NOT consider it vague |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Bad news for Bernie Ward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. The law needs to be explicit. The wide range of differences here at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. And under the decision that is NOT the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. What is the difference between "naked" and "sexual"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Read the decision, that is up to a Jury to decide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Is a nude picture of a naked child an explicit sexual picture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. That is where intent comes into play, and both the Majority and Consent agrees with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-19-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. Here is the Opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
19. I do wish news services would be more careful when using hyphens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC