|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 09:59 PM Original message |
Coburn Gun Amendment Tacked Onto Credit Card Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. WTF do guns have to do with credit cards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It'll be stripped out in conference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 07:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. If it get's stripped out in commitee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 08:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Happens all the time - Dems as well as Repubs. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just so long as Senator Coburn's office also follows state gun rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why can't they reject amendments that are not related to the bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Everybody does it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 02:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Right. It makes me wonder why people are so unaware that this is commonly done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 07:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. The Senate can, but 67 Senators did not want to do so: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. In the senate amendments don't have to be germane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. They can - it takes 51 votes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-12-09 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. ah, so will the gun salivators keep following *state rules* when it doesn't suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 01:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Gun salivators? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. This is why I think presidents should have line-item vetos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Reagan was begging for line-item veto power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Regardless of the President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
santamargarita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
11. Line item veto from our President... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:08 AM Response to Original message |
12. Thankfully, it just makes the Republicans look stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, the amendment makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. Why shouldn't we be allowed to carry guns in National Parks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. Maybe the credit card bill can be made better since Republicans will have a harder time voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
19. Fine - then I'll support this gun amendment as long as there is ONE more amendment that does this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. There is no overwhelming social need to prohibit citizens from exercising a pre-existing right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-13-09 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yeah, turn back Bernie Sanders' amendment to cap credit card interest rates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 15th 2024, 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC