Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High court to review media mogul's conviction. (Black)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:33 AM
Original message
High court to review media mogul's conviction. (Black)
Edited on Mon May-18-09 10:34 AM by sinkingfeeling
Source: MSNBC.com

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider overturning the fraud conviction of media executive Conrad Black, who is serving a 6 1/2 year prison term.

The justices will hear arguments later this year over the convictions of Black, the former chairman and chief executive of the Hollinger International media company, and two other former executives in connection with payments of $5.5 million they received from a Hollinger subsidiary.

The men argued that they did not commit fraud because they did no harm to the company.

Black and former executives John A. Boultbee and Mark S. Kipnis argue that the $5.5 million actually represented management fees that the subsidiary owed to the executives.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30807024/



How is it that the SCOTUS takes on this, but rejects anything that might help the American people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. They took this case because the lower courts are divided
One of the principal reasons the SCOTUS will decide to take a case is when the courts of appeals have reached conflicting results on an issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because the SCOTUS, like the rest of the government, despises
the American People, and exist only to server their masters, like Mr. Black here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh great... The only reason the Roberts court looks at something is to undo lower decisions
Edited on Mon May-18-09 10:42 AM by ck4829
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Easy decision for the Supremes
He'll get off because he is stinkin rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. He did do harm to the company.
Taking an exorbitantly high CEO/director salary when the company could make more productive use of the money qualifies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC