Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates says (WikiLeaks) video of U.S. helicopter attack in Iraq out of context

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:30 AM
Original message
Gates says (WikiLeaks) video of U.S. helicopter attack in Iraq out of context
Source: LA Times

The Defense secretary says the video on a website is akin to 'looking at the war through a soda straw' and that viewers could not have understood what was going on before or after the strike.


Reporting from Lima, Peru
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Tuesday took a swipe at the website that released secret military video of a 2007 helicopter gunship incident in Iraq in which civilians, including two news agency employees, were killed.

Gates said the videos released by the group WikiLeaks were out of context and provided an incomplete picture of the battlefield, comparing it to war as seen "through a soda straw."

"These people can put out whatever they want and are never held accountable for it," said Gates, speaking to reporters aboard his plane en route to Lima, Peru, for a defense ministers conference this week. "There is no before and no after. It is only the present."

The WikiLeaks website last week released classified video of a 2007 shooting in Iraq by an Apache helicopter that killed two Reuters news agency employees and 10 other civilians. Those wounded included children.

Helicopter crew members said they mistook the people on the ground for insurgents.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-fg-gates-video14-2010apr14,0,708305.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, Mr. Gates. It is yourself and the military that needs to be held accountable
for what are very patently war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We need to just get out of Iraq now
Edited on Wed Apr-14-10 09:36 AM by mvd
No more phased withdrawal at this point - time we are out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree, and I would tack on Afghanistan
Pakistan and Yemen to that list as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. +1000000000000000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looking through a soda straw?
I agree, we need to see the whole bloody soda. This was just one moment in 7 years of this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. So it needs to be viewed in the context of even more killing?
Sure. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why did Obama keep this insane chimp appointed fuckwad?
Gates is a fucking idiot. Not much has changed when it comes to US war and occupation. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You go to war with the military brass you have
not that you wish you had? :shrug: paraphrasing (recycling) Rummy talking points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. If you have to ask...
... apparently part of the strategy of n-dimensional chess of change is to keep the exact same personnel in charge of the exact same insane policy. And if that personnel has some very very dirty luggage, like Mr. Gates being up to the gills into the Iran-Contra fiasco, then it is even doubleplusgood!

Us mere mortals can only cope with the complexities of 2D chess, so we are hopeless when it comes to understand the magnitude of genius involved in masterful n-dimensional chess playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Ah.
Okay then. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Right and wrong all at once
Yes, one can see more in this video than is actually there. We aren't told why they were in that area, looking for folks. We don't know why they so quickly decided that a camera was an RPG. We don't know why they cared so much that someone might come along and actually help someone shot and lying on the ground.

I'm fairly sure these guys thought they were in some sort of "Blackhawk Down" situation. They seemed to be seeing threats everywhere.

The part that Gates, and by extension Obama, is missing is that this is what you decide to accept when you decide to fight a war, especially in an urban area. No US city would accept this kind of "policing". Shooting with large caliber guns from a couple of thousand of feet away? Any police officer would be in trouble for this kind of shooting. When you decide to go to war, you are deciding to kill innocent people. You don't fight wars and only kill the "bad guys". So when our leaders talk about "peace with honor" or "finishing the job" or "bringing democracy to the region", they are talking about the price being paid by the innocent.
Gates needs to go back to that fill and look at it with his wide view, and make the case that even with the wide view, what we are doing, what we are paying, is worth these people, these children, being shot and killed at a distance, and their bodies being run over by our trucks.

And why are we now spending money to train the Iraqi's to do it to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. "...and are never held accountable for it"
Yeah for releasing these leaked videos, someone should be held accountable!

But for starting two illegal wars based on lies to enrich your rich military contractor buddies, No Accountability.

USA USA USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure they meant well.
Their aim just wasn't very good. That's what you're saying Robert - right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Out of what context, the context of a pre-emptive illegal bloodbath? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. What context justifies shooting an ambulance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. So lets look through a bundle of straws. How many operations
are there per day? Post ALL of the videos so we can get the whole picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. that was a pretty wide-angle soda straw if you ask me...
Edited on Wed Apr-14-10 10:59 AM by tomm2thumbs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. Better to view through a soda straw, than in complete darkness
Which is how Gates wants us to make our democratic decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. If, and I stress 'if" he is right
then its mainly the fault of the pentagon and the Bush administration for being being so secretive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. I heard these same lame excuses last week...
on this very site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Please Mr. Gates, explain the fucking context then. I hate this bullshit "out of context" excuse
if its really out of context then explain the fucking context you asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. The most favorable possible interpretation of the video and Gates remarks

could repeat could accept that the initial contact was justified.

However after the initial contact it was clear that the two initial survivors did not have weapons and were not a threat and the continuation of the attack was not just pointless but counter productive. If indeed they were bad guys then they were eliminating possible sources of information.

Looking at the video it was clear that the van was a good Samaritan. A rescue van for bad guys would have atleast glanced in the air to see if there was a threat and it was clear that the Good Samaritans were completely absorbed by the carnage before them.

Again there was no weapons seen in the van and 2 or 3 rounds into the engine could have disabled it while the ground troops were arriving on scene.

What is so alarming about the video is not that they concluded that they were all insurgents but that there was no questioning, especially for the Good Samaritans, before they made the conclusion.

Based on other actions Gates has taken I wonder if this is a pro forma defense and if he didn't have other opinions privately, in any case this is not Gates brightest moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Bush war crimes fixer resents free press, demands accountability."
Edited on Wed Apr-14-10 11:47 AM by EFerrari
And a big FU, too, Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. So I guess that incident was just business as usual. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. WikiLeaks needs get hold of the documents/recording of those who gave the orders
to target and murder those from the news media. I feel pretty certain those orders came from
the top. There are several incidents when the media was shot at or killed for which the 'excuse'
of mistaken identity was used. And they'll continue to use that until a whistleblower or other
inside source provides proof that these killings were intentionally ordered.

That includes the unprovoked killing of citizens as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC