Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP leaders renew attacks on White House over auto industry rescue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:35 PM
Original message
GOP leaders renew attacks on White House over auto industry rescue
Source: Detroit Free Press

WASHINGTON – A day after the Obama administration hailed progress in the government-sponsored turnarounds of General Motors and Chrysler, congressional Republicans leveled fresh political criticism today at the administration’s aid to the industry.

* * *

Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., accused the White House of strong-arming automakers last year into backing fuel economy standards of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 in return for keeping GM and Chrysler from collapsing in bankruptcy.


Issa asked the CEOs of nine automakers -- GM, Chrysler, Ford and the U.S. arms of Toyota, BMW, Volkswagen, Nissan, Suzuki and Honda – to turn over a bevy of documents about the talks with the White House and California officials that led to the agreement last May. The rules went into effect last month.


“It is unclear whether the Administration used leverage created by the possibility of a taxpayer bailout of GM and Chrysler to secure their cooperation and support for new fuel economy standards,” Issa said in the letter.



Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20100422/BUSINESS01/100422054/1318/GOP-renews-attacks-over-auto-loans



A winning strategy in November. Argue that Democrats should have let the American auto industry implode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't GM paying off their loan early?
And the Republicans were gung ho about the bailouts under the previous prezident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. No, GM is giving back some of the contingency money it didn't spend.
Total bailout of GM was $50 billion, including $16 billion in cash for operating funds to keep the doors open through the (unknown) duration of the recession. GM spent $11 billion of that on operations but because the auto market didn't completely collapse, GM didn't need the last $5 billion, so it's giving that back.

The rest of it ($45 billion) ain't coming home again for a long time, or according to the government itself, never.

GM's PR guys know that most people won't know what this really is, and thus it looks like GM's coming up roses all of the sudden. It's not. It's currently losing billions per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama should have let them fail...and kept gas milage low
This is seriously what they plan to run on.

PLEASE someone sharpen the attack back. Call these cretins out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. No, let them scream themselves out on this issue.
This is hilarious. It's dumb, really. All the Dems need to say is "So?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other that a handful of foreigh car makers & dealers, and
I suppose some well heeled fat cats that really don't care, HOW DO THEY HOPE TO WIN WITH THAT IDEA????

There are a heck of a lot more GM & Chrusler dealers and employees than foreign car dealers and also people like me who who never even owned a GM vehicle who supported the LOANS the Fed granted because I can only GUESS at how many people would be unemployed all across the country. You can't possibly convince me that only Dems work for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. and increasing fuel economy is bad because?
what a f*ing fool. They have nothing so they say such stupid things with straight faces. I thought the admin was supposed to use leverage and that was certainly better than getting campaign funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Fuel Efficiency Is A Form Of Tyranny Perhaps?
I guess we may laugh, but I would not put anything past Glenn Beck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. ah, the tyranny of good governance
of course, we must avoid that at all costs...especially the tax payers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here is something I do not like to admit
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 10:34 PM by mrdmk
Darrell Issa is my U.S. Representative here in North San Diego County, California.

Here is Issa's 'Bitch List' for this week:

The White House is using unpaid interns to do work.

The SEC is in a consprisey with the White House on the timing of the Goldman Sach's civil suit.

Once again harping on the loans to U.S. auto makers.

Here is a link bitching about the White House: http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Issa



As far as Issa is concerned, any the White House does needs a congressional hearing. Of course the media is giving Issa a soapbox to spout out anything the White House does is wrong. Just another day of politicking the politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Republicons whine and lie because that's all they know..
President Obama is doing an amazing job in spite of all the lies and cheap shots swirling around him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Not too long ago - "Right-wing radio hosts Hewitt and Limbaugh back GM boycott"
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 11:20 PM by TomCADem
I guess Issa's complaints about fuel economy are not too surprising when one considers that some right wingers were demanding that Americans boycott GM.

http://detnews.com/article/20090609/AUTO01/906090329/Right-wing-radio-hosts-Hewitt-and-Limbaugh-back-GM-boycott



Washington -- A pair of right-wing radio hosts says there's only one choice for conservatives angry about government involvement in the auto industry: Boycott GM.

"Nobody wants to support an Obama company," Rush Limbaugh told his audience Friday, citing a poll showing that 17 percent of Americans backed a boycott of GM.

"Every dollar spent with GM is a dollar spent against free enterprise," conservative talker Hugh Hewitt wrote online last week.

Conservatives in Congress and elsewhere have criticized the federally sponsored restructuring plan GM will seek to execute in bankruptcy court. The plan would give the federal government a 60 percent ownership stake in the company; lawmakers such as Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., have labeled that socialism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Aha! GM came back in spite of limpy's whining call
for a boycott.

Just brainless idiots..all they can come up with is :silly:"socialsim".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Issa could be an impressive Republican if he could stop being so
Paranoid and stop looking for some nefarious motive for Obama's
every action.

He seems to want every little thing investigated because he is
questioning everything.

While I do not agree with him philosophically, I have watched
him in Meetings. He comes prepared and seems to have a good
working knowledge of the subject at hand. Too bad he is developing
the worst habits of the GOP. When people notice a pattern, it
can turn them away.

The GOP weakness is they never know when to stop and overrreach
even when not in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. It is more than likely that I am smarter than Darrell Issa......
and that's not saying much about me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Where was
Issa during the Bush area? Seems like the GOP never do anything wrong.

Obama is far from the perfect president but I have a good feeling to trying to bring us out of this bull shit mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Issa was up Bush's ass........
where he still resides to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
activa8tr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Sorry, but I have been reading your posts for a while, and you are WAY smarter
than that pea brain paranoid azz.

I love your posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Hey...I appreciate that! Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Darrell Issa supports sending US money to the Middle East?
The two options are:

1. Encourage more fuel efficient cars so we send less American money to the countries in the Middle East who produce oil. Many of these countries are, of course, predominantly Muslim countries.

2. Use less fuel efficient cars and send more American money to countries in the Middle East.

Why does Darrell Issa love Muslim countries so much and hate America?

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm guessing this renewed hissyfit is an attempt to distract from the
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 05:10 AM by annabanana
financial bill info.
(Not quite sure who they're trying to distract, though. If it looks like they aren't going to block the legislation, maybe they're trying to sheild that cooperation from their crazybase.)

on edit: no, maybe not.. Their twisty unfact-y dancing is making me dizzy. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. That's all you got Issa?
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 09:54 AM by lumberjack_jeff
The government leveraged their loan to encourage improved fuel economy? Really?

It's funny what becomes possible when survival is at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. The GOP is on the losing side of yet another issue.
Yes, of course! Obama should have let the auto industry--and with it thousands of jobs--implode!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Let's see, industry rehabilitated, jobs saved, and better gas mileage
Yep, sounds like a horrible outcome to me! The only way it could be worse (in Issa's eyes) is if cancer had been cured, to boot.

I must say that I like that Issa has to "ask" and not subpoena the documents from the auto companies. He doesn't have any power to do that as a member of the minority party. They could tell him to go take a flying leap, and Issa couldn't do anything about it. Well, except run crying to a sympathetic ear in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. And getting new fuel economy standards
in return for saving thousands of jobs is worse than darth meeting, in the white house, w/ oil barons & plotting invasions of countries w/ that particular resource?

Please explain governor recall wannabe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC