Ottawa to sell Petro-Canada stake - Breaking News CBC

Screaming Lord Byron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 09:34 AM
Original message

Ottawa to sell Petro-Canada stake - Breaking News CBC

Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 09:35 AM by Screaming Lord Byron

http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/03/23/business/petcan040323

OTTAWA - The federal government will sell its stake in Petro-Canada, Finance Minister Ralph Goodale said Tuesday, in a transaction that could earn Ottawa almost $3 billion. Goodale confirmed media speculation about the impending sale just hours before he was due to deliver the budget speech.

In a three-paragraph statement, Goodale said the governent would sell its stake, but "the precise timing of the sale is yet to be determined."

Rumours have been mounting since a media report on the weekend said Ottawa was considering selling its stake in Petro-Canada (TSX-PCA). Since then, there have been more stories citing unnamed sources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Minstrel Boy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message

1. This pisses me off.

A petroleum giant like Canada ought to have a public energy sector. It was timely in the early 1970s, when Petro-Canada was born during the Lib-NDP coalition, but it's needed now more than ever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Screaming Lord Byron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. The damage was done years ago when Govt. ownership dropped below 50%

They owned 19% of the shares. I don't know the structure of the shareholders at Petro Canada, but 19% is not a huge amount. The guilty party is the government who deliberately made themselves a minority shareholder in what should be a nationalized asset. I assume that was Mulroney's doing. Now, if the Liberals take a sizeable chunk of this money and put it into wind and wave power, I'll be a bit happier.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Minstrel Boy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2

3. Agree, the damage was done by Mulroney.

As I said elsewhere, I wasn't even aware the government had any stake left in Petro-Canada. At only 19%, there's not much to be done but profit take. There's no "window" into the petroleum industry and no public leadership, which was pretty much the idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Screaming Lord Byron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3

4. It's a sad end to Canada's attempt to control some of it's own resources.

Eventually, people will learn that they need to have some control over their own natural resources. Otherwise the free market will take it, and the profits away from you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Spazito

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4

5. Totally agree with you!

I am so tired of other countries coming in and buying up the rights to our resources, that needs to stop, imo. I have no problem with outside interests owning MINORITY shares but Canadians must own the controling share when it comes to our natural resources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Screaming Lord Byron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5

6. That's one reason the Scandinavians have a high standard of living.

Canada does not have strong enough restrictions on foreign ownership of crucial industries. That should be obvious to anyone. If a foreign entity is a majority shareholder in a Canadian corporation, what will be their first loyalty - to themselves and their home country, or to the workforce and Canada. What is to stop them strip-mining the company and shipping the assets abroad?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

daleo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3

7. As a major shareholder, wouldn't they still have a window

I grant it is far from a controlling interest, but wouldn't they still be a fairly major player on the Board of Directors, and that sort of thing? Perhaps regulatory agencies would give sufficient insight into reserves, costs of production, etc., but one would think that being a substantial shareholder in Petro-Canada would be invaluable for gaining the insider knowledge helpful in shaping public energy policy. With the talk of peak oil, this seems like an exceptionally stupid time to sell this interest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Screaming Lord Byron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. I'm no expert on corporate governance, I'm afraid.

It would be a good sign of intention if they were to invest the money in renewable energy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Spazito

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-23-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message

9. There used to be a solid policy about foreign ownership....

but I think it was during the disasterous Mulroney years that the % that could be bought by foreign companies was raised. Like everything else done by Mulroney, it was a disasterous policy change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue May 21st 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.