Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WRAPUP 3-US says must rely on BP to stop oil;Iran offers help

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:50 AM
Original message
WRAPUP 3-US says must rely on BP to stop oil;Iran offers help
Source: Reuters

VENICE, La., May 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. government is forced to rely on BP and the private oil sector to try to plug the gushing Gulf of Mexico well because only they have the technical know-how to stop the spill at those depths, the U.S. Coast Guard chief said on Sunday.

<snip>

Iran, a fierce critic of Washington, repeated an offer to assist with the Gulf spill, calling it no great challenge compared to what Iran itself had dealt with.

<snip>

In Tehran, Mehran Alinejad, head of special drilling operations at the National Iranian Drilling Co., said Iran had successfully dealt with past huge oil leaks, particularly when rigs were bombed during a war with Iraq in the 1980s.

"Iranian technical teams have had major achievements in oil well capping compared with which the Gulf of Mexico oil rig is no feat," he told IRNA news agency.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idAFN2226640420100523?rpc=44



Iran has the knowledge and so does BP according to this story.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is an opportunity for the world to work together to save the planet...
But will we be able to get past all the old hate and do it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. no hatred for Iran where I sit
got nothing against the Persian people. Why must we use the word "hate". I do not hate them, I love them as they are my relations as are all other humans and living things on this planet.

Thanks for your kind offer Iran. I'll take you up on it personally if no one else will!

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree....we are all one, really.
It just hit me that this is a big opportunity for the people of this planet to act like grown ups and come together for the common good..hell, survival, of the planet that gives us life. How hard is that to figure out really?

I'm with you, CountAllVotes, thank you Iran and all others who offer help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Heal the World
this is our chance.

We Could Fly So High
Let Our Spirits Never Die
In My Heart
I Feel You Are All
My Brothers
Create A World With
No Fear
Together We'll Cry
Happy Tears
See The Nations Turn
Their Swords
Into Plowshares

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Iran: "piece of cake"
its about the same level of bullshit we used to invade Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree and opportunity for the world to come together
to save the planet. The Russians also ought to have some valuable expertise....and the Norwegians, the list goes on.This is too important to be left to BP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree and opportunity for the world to come together
to save the planet. The Russians also ought to have some valuable expertise....and the Norwegians, the list goes on.This is too important to be left to BP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iran has the tools at this depth?
I highly doubt it. I don't especially feel a sense of gratitude to Iran, considering this is all just political posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. why wouldn't Iran know?
Edited on Sun May-23-10 12:09 PM by CountAllVotes
this is after all what they do. They have plenty of resources down in the Persian Gulf, do not kid yourself. They have a huge Navy, I know that much and they after all are the experts in the Gulf. Saudi Arabia hasn't offered anything at all have they?

If Iran is offering to help, I say take them at their word.

Do we really need to bomb bomb bomb Iran? I hope the hell not.

:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Few nations in the world...
have the capability to send seacraft down 5,000 ft. This has never happened, so Iran has no more knowledge than anyone else would. And I don't think it's wise to take Iran at its word. it operates in a political world and its "word" is often no more than bombast and political posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. "because only they have the technical know-how to stop the spill at those depths"
They also have a conflict-of-interest in NOT stopping the spill... What a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Iran may have experience, but not at depths like this.
Working with surface wells like Iran's isn't the same as a hole on the continental shelf, under a mile of water (over 1 ton per square inch pressure) and then another six miles under that (total vertical depth is over 35,000 feet.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Iran has experience with off shore drilling.
The problem is only 5000 feet down. Your 35,000 is a straw man and doesn't compute.
And it is mostly pressure difference, not total pressure they have to worry about. The difference between the pressure in the well and the water pressure at 5000 feet. There are submersibles already there, designed, not only to operate at that depth, but for that kind of work.

Iran could very well have the tools and expertise to stop the leak. And even maybe to have a producing well when they are done. What's to lose? BP so far has not shown much competence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. there is nothing to lose
Edited on Sun May-23-10 01:27 PM by CountAllVotes
and this is a far better option that having to evacuate the entire gulf coast region as this person is stating to be the case:

http://gazbom.blogspot.com/2010/05/benzene-killer-plans-in-place-to.html

Take what is being offered America! BP has nothing to offer but more grief. Iran may have many options. Just because WE don't know does not mean that such options do not exist.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. wow
Looks like it is coming right from the top, then. Very frightening and disturbing.

"The U.S. government is forced to rely on BP and the private oil sector to try to plug the gushing Gulf of Mexico well because only they have the technical know-how to stop the spill at those depths, the U.S. Coast Guard chief said on Sunday."

Never in the past was the government forced to privatize something because it lacked any "technical know-how" about anything.

Look at this double talk:

Admiral Thad Allen was asked on CNN's "State of the Union" show on Sunday why the U.S. federal government did not completely take over the spill containment operation from the London-based firm.

The answer?

"What makes this an unprecedented anomalous event is access to the discharge site is controlled by the technology that was used for the drilling, which is owned by the private sector. They have the eyes and ears that are down there. They are necessarily the modality by which this is going to get solved."

Besides...

"I trust Tony Hayward. When I talk to him, I get an answer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good opportunity for everyone to come together.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama should agree to Iran's "help" in order to smoke it out as propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Only BP has expertise to stop spill, top U.S. response official says
Edited on Sun May-23-10 04:33 PM by IScreamSundays
Source: Miami Herald

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. official leading the response to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill said Sunday that only BP had the expertise to plug the gaping hole in its deepwater well and that he trusted the oil company was doing its best.

The comments by Adm. Thad Allen, the commandant of the Coast Guard, signaled that the U.S. government wouldn't take a larger role in stopping the five-week-old spill even as frustration along the Gulf Coast grows over the Obama administration's policy of letting BP run the effort.

While officials in Louisiana readied for an expansive oil slick to make landfall on Grand Isle, a major tourist hub, BP officials said they would deploy late Tuesday or before dawn Wednesday their latest attempt to stop the spill - a complex "top kill" maneuver that involves pumping the hole full of mud and cement.

"They have the eyes and ears that are down there. They are necessarily the modality by which this is going to get solved," Allen said on CNN's "State of the Union" program. "Our responsibility is to conduct proper oversight to make sure they do that."

snip>

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/05/23/1644306/only-bp-has-expertise-to-stop.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. "only BP had the expertise to plug . . . " - hmmmmmm - and where is that expertise
not so sure I agree with the Admiral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Do you see anyone else with more that has solved the problem?
saying to BP you won't take it any more sure didn't do anything productive to fix the flow. Maybe if we all clap and say we believe in fairies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. has BP demonstrated any expertise in stopping the flow?
have they solved the problem?

Exactly what expertise is the Admiral referring to?

No . . . I don't see anyone else. But I am not a part of the industry. I just don't see any expertise being exhibited by BP. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Yeah, I have seen some others who can help solve the problem
And I'm seeing reports that their offers of help are being rebuffed possibly due to BP seeing the solutions as too expensive. Saving their ass and saving their money are the only things driving BP right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I would beg to disagree with the Admiral
If they had the alleged expertise (and had actually used it) this would not have happened in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Maybe BP is the only one who can cap the well but couldn't a whole lot of others do
Containment and cleanup?

This looks fubared to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyounkin Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. If they did- they would be able to get
their hands on BPs oil!!

and that ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. If BP is the only company capable of plugging the volcano, then shouldn't we void all other leases?
Seriously. If all of the engineers in the world with this expertise work for BP, what does that say about the risk of the non-BP rigs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. now that is a valid point - we are doing things where if there is a problem we can't solve it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. The points made in this thread need to be thrown back at the USCG.
I am not saying the Feds need to take the operation over (never have), but lets call it for what it is. Oversight isn't repeating BP talking points (1k, ok 5k a day, collecting 2k, er 5k, er 2k a day) it is INDEPENDENTLY analyzing this crap and letting We The People know WTF is going on down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
54. +1 Void BP's lease, too. No one has the expertise, so just cut it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Bookmarked and Rec'd. This one's a keeper n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. what a whopping load of crap
That is simply not news, just pure propaganda. Trusted? TRUSTED? Give me a break. :puke:

Oh, and if an oil company is the only entity on the planet that can solve such an issue, then we're screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silenttigersong Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Wait a minute
Is Bp siphoning 5000 barrels a day off this ?I do not know the price of oil,but I bet this will help pay for their limited capped damages,BP lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanmj Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Right on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Heckuva job there, Tadd.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. And another thing. "They have the eyes and ears that are down there"
Where is the OVERSIGHT in that statement? Where are OUR "eyes and ears".

Memo to Allen: Oversight is NOT defined by taking the word of the perp as fact and repeating the talking points they give you as "official government". Oversight is conducting your OWN fucking investigation with your OWN independent scientists and labs.

I need to go puke now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. " Oversight is NOT defined by taking the word of the perp as fact and repeating the talking point"
Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
55. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. Too bad BP didn't have the expertise to prevent the blowout in the first place.
The implied message from the admiral: "We haven't a clue how to fix this problem, so we are not getting involved."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. UNBELIEVABLE! if B*sh had done this -- holy S**T
That Obama hasn't really made this a priority or cares very much about it is painfully obvious.
His "legacy" will live on forever, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. Obama was all over this the day after it blew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #48
56. After it blew was too late, esp. if you have no clue how to stop it or fix it.
Edited on Mon May-24-10 05:51 AM by No Elephants
Besides, define "all over it." Hoping. after the fact, that BP will just "get 'er done" is not comforting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
38. There must be trolls unreccing this thread. We need to keep this post alive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thanks. Forgot to rec with my ranting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
40. But not the experience
Who has the experience? The Mexican government (PEMEX), the Iranian government (NIOC), and the Russian government (Rosneft). Hmmm, maybe that "government IS the problem" line is all bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. +4,000,000gal/day for 30+ days nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanmj Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
41. More on the federal gov't bs....
Two major pelican rookeries are now awash in crude.

Jindal made his remarks on a boat at the edge of one of the pelican nesting grounds. He and officials from several coastal parishes say the berms would close the door on the oil still pouring from a deepwater gusher about 50 miles off the coast.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is studying the environmental impacts from the emergency barrier proposal. The Corps didn't immediately respond to e-mails and telephone messages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. First off, I doubt that the Government has any of the needed...
equipment to deal with this problem. It also has no experts on the payroll. The liability is BP's and for the gov. to take over MIGHT void that liability. Probably more lawyers involved here than oil specialists.

The equipment on the sea floor is BP's. Perhaps there is a difference between this equipment and the equipment of other companies.

We do have doubts about the news/lack of news coming out of the spill zone. This may be due more to legal liability and responsibility than to actually blacking out news. Whatever is being done takes time...nothing will be a quick fix.

Anyone know for sure if another drilling rig has been brought in or is BP using drilling ships(theirs)for salvage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Very valid and good points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. that's obscene. I was in Alaska cleaning up Exxon Valdez 20 years ago
the same thing happened: Exxon called the shots, decided when the beaches were clean, and the Coast Guard was relegated to being their errand boys.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
45. USCG's expertise
is as "First Responders" not as post-incident "remediators".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. We are in some serious trouble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
50. If they had, a week after the leak, siezed ALL of BP's assets,
Edited on Sun May-23-10 07:39 PM by Doctor_J
then the government would now have the needed equipment. In point of fact, BP has no real incentive to fix the leak. Their only obligation is to their stockholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. you are delusional if you think "BP has no real incentive to fix the leak"
they have every incentive, their guys were the first to die, and their guys are gonna be the first to have their asses handed to them (either losing good jobs or someone going to jail when all the fingers are pointed)

BP does not benefit in any way from this continuing for one more nano-second


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. and you are delusional if you think they give a shit about "their guys"...
sure "BP does not benefit in any way from this continuing for one more nano-second"... who does?

it's all CSA- cover shareholders asse(t)s now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. Are you series?
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:29 AM by Doctor_J
1. Their guys were the first to die

"Their guys?!?!?" "Their guys" work in the boardroom, and none of them died, or were severely inconvenienced, except for a temporary dip in their portfolios.

2. their guys are gonna be the first to have their asses handed to them

Yeah, that's going to happen. They and Blankenship are reeeeeeealy worried :scared:

3. Losing jobs

Prediction: They'll all get jobs, either elsewhere in Big Oil, or as Repuke politicians

4. Going to jail

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

5. BP does not benefit in any way

Nor do they suffer

Wake up and smell the fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
51. If only they had the public interest at heart
NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
60. He might not have known about Iran?
cough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
52. if they are telling the truth it's no time to stand on pride
unfortunately i think it's just propaganda horseshit but if they have something to offer let's by all means hear it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
59. Of course we should ask for Iran for help and anyone else's help!
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:32 AM by Rosa Luxemburg
I think the US is doing as much as it is able to but we do need outside help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC