Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Menendez Introducing Unlimited Cap On BP Damages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:05 PM
Original message
Menendez Introducing Unlimited Cap On BP Damages
Source: Huffington Post

Sam Stein
HuffPost Reporting

Exclusive: Menendez Introducing Unlimited Cap On BP Damages

First Posted: 05-25-10 12:48 PM | Updated: 05-25-10 12:50 PM


Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) is set to introduce on Tuesday afternoon a bill that would fully eliminate any cap on the amount of economic damages that oil companies would have to pay for spills they've caused.

The New Jersey Democrat is revising an earlier version of legislation he introduced which would have raised the cap from $75 million dollars in liability to $10 billion. Now, the cap will be, effectively, unlimited, an aide said.

The revised legislation will get its first floor hearing on Tuesday afternoon as Senate Democratic leadership is expected to call for unanimous consent. In all likelihood, a Republican senator will object (they have objected twice already to Menendez's $10 billion cap) forcing Democrats into another course of action.

That said, the New Jersey Democrat is hoping that by making liability unlimited he can effectively remove the GOP talking point that the $10 billion cap was an arbitrary number. He's also hoping to ride the growing wave of anger at BP for its oversight of the spill in the Gulf.


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/25/exclusive-menendez-introd_n_588867.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will it be retroactive to include this spill though? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Of course! Wasn't telecom immunity retroactive? It's the way it's done now.
But even if it is counted from today the damages, if they are counted fairly, will bust them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sen. Lisa Murkowski will not have this!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bless that man.
He makes me proud to be from NJ, something hard to do with Christie running the state. The work Menendez and his people have done for people with onerous mortgages, work largely unherealded, is inspirational.

Oh, Rush Holt and his people are fine folks as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I've liked him since I first saw him on the SFRC - you could tell he was a no BS
kind of guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Ditto from this New Jerseyan. NJ's US Senators do us all proud! n/t
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are asking for volunteers to watch for oil on Cocoa Beach FL! Who knows what may happen! n't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. "unlimited cap"- isn't that a contradiction of terms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good on you Senator Menendez
they cannot be allowed to inflict all this environmental, economical, and psychological harm on Gulf residents (and perhaps the entire ocean) without at least paying a very public price for their criminal behavior. It won't bring the Gulf of Mexico back though and for that I am profoundly sad, no amount of damages can cover destroying a priceless body of water and coastline, so it might as well be a limitless (and mostly symbolic) judgement brought against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. This Is All For Show.
In the unlikely event that it would pass, (let alone make it to the floor for a vote)it would be overturned as a violation of ex post facto. The legislators responsible for this cap will have to live with the repercussions of their short-sighted legislation and vote for said legislation. My they be voted out of office at the first available chance.

FSH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is This Why There Is A Recall Ballot Brewing Against Menendez?....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. United States Senators are not subject to recall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. If BP Says That It Will Cover All Costs Of This Disaster & Until All The Oil Is Cleaned Up......
then why should any one in Congress object to having an unlimited cap on liability? Naive question - huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billymayshere Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. LOL! Good luck on that one!
Does anyone really think the "new democrats" are gonna vote for this one? Thanks for the comedy relief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. Republicans Block It Again Today. Where's The Coverage?
Once again the corporate media runs interference for big oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC