Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistan Prime Minister to warn US over Osama bin Laden raid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:29 PM
Original message
Pakistan Prime Minister to warn US over Osama bin Laden raid
Source: UK Telegraph

Yusuf Raza Gilani will seek to restore some dignity in an address to the nation after the humiliation caused when American forces killed Osama bin Laden at a compound close to Pakistan's main military academy in Abbottabad last week without alerting Pakistan.

A senior government source close to the prime minister said while Mr Gilani will take an aggressive stand to shore up the government's position.

The source said: "The Prime Minister will say that the United States should not have bypassed Pakistan. We have made a huge contribution in fighting terrorism. We've arrested close to 100 al-Qaeda people, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

"We'll take appropriate action if any further violation takes place. We will defend our air space by any means we have."

Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/al-qaeda/8501266/Pakistan-Prime-Minister-to-warn-US-over-Osama-bin-Laden-raid.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maxdee55 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Who Cares
To hell with these double dealing shit heads, tell them stop helping these terrorists with one hand while taking our money with the other. And the next time they want to talk tough tell them they just might get smacked around a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, like the US gives a rat's ass
Edited on Sun May-08-11 04:34 PM by ixion
seriously. Until the US starts facing sanctions and criminal action for it's criminal acts, it's really not going to care who gets miffed at one of its 'raids'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. OH yeah? let me quote Sam Kinison that that asshole:
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK

YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe in some of that evidence
seized are some names of Military or ISI go-to guys that ObL used. That might help the Pakistani government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Duly noted.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. You were harboring Osama Bin Laden. STFU you duplicitous fuckwad.
Pakistan could turn all Afghanistan in a heartbeat.
Next to India you're a 'nuclear power', but don't
let that go to your head - you'd never get
anything off the ground if it came to that.
Sit back and consider your sorry ass lucky we still
smile at your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. That's a great example of why groups like al Qaida exist
thanks for presenting a text book model of the Ugly American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. Really? You need a refresher on the history of the western world.
Edited on Mon May-09-11 03:15 AM by Kurska
If you think the reason Al Qaeda exist is the united states not giving enough consideration to other countries, it is more about the history of the Soviet Union's colonial folly in Afghanistan and the United States misguided attempt to get back at the Soviet Union for Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. I'm well aquainted with the history you speak of
Edited on Mon May-09-11 07:15 AM by ixion
And your snarky remarks aside, it doesn't change the validity of my premise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck him
what a bunch of nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dont wanna be our friend any longer? give back about 20 BILLION dollars.....US, not dinars.
sucka
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, he plans to address our operation ...
Will he also be addressing how OBL managed to hide on his doorstep for years, all while Pakistan was collecting US dollars to help hunt for him? That seems like quite the coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muskypundit Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. HOW DARE YOU USA?!!?!?!?!
Your were supposed to tell us when you were about to get bin laden. How else are we going to move him just in time to save your justification for giving us billions of dollars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadtotheboneBob Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah! What y'all said!
What a bunch of Lying liars, tellin' lying lies, they are, I'm sayin'! And smiling, too, while they're doin' it, Dagnabbit! May the fleas of 10,000 camels infest their nether regions! So there... I'm done... Thank You...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pakistan's biggest bargaining chip
got trumped (pun intended).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Self-righteous sabre-rattling for domestic consumption.
The only think Pakistanis are good at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. The white man's burden in Pakistan
This is a further extension on the propaganda theme that Pakistan can't defend Pakistan, which is, I think, a mistaken portrayal of the situation. Of course, the mainstream and left alternative media have been the vehicle for propagating the falsehood that Pakistan can't defend its nuclear weapons either and that it is the "white man's burden" to keep their armies in Afghanistan indefinitely until this threat to world peace is ended.

The real question is can the US and its NATO supporters really maintain their forces in Afghanistan with active opposition from the Pakistani Armed Forces? It is not that much of an achievement to penetrate a foreign nations territory with low flying aircraft. That is simply a tactic. It is especially easy where a country a priori has determined that a major war is not in its interest and has gone out of its way to restrain it capability to defend itself in the interest of avoiding uncontrolled war. After all, if you shoot down a US military aircraft in anger, the prospects for future peace don't look good.

Could the US avoid interdiction of its supply lines to Afghanistan in the event of overt conflict with Pakistan? The US forces on the ground there would need to rely on other countries for inferior ground logistics and for a time be presented with a "Berlin crisis" of a military nature. Would the US go ahead then and bomb the hell out of Pakistan? I think so. Would China sit by and do nothing? In lieu of WW III, China could simply move its most advanced anti air missiles into Pakistan and perhaps Afghanistan to interfere with US air operations and begin organizing and mobilizing for general war at an unspecified future date. This is a very ugly prospect.

As the economic crisis in the US continues, it is irresponsible brinkmanship to continue drone attacks and other military incursions into Pakistan. American forces need to be pulled out of central Asia or we risk at the very least, a catastrophe much larger than that sustained in Vietnam, and possibly a nuclear war. I say nuclear war, because it is already official Pentagon policy, which they declared before the irresponsible invasion of Iraq, to commit "preemptive" nuclear strikes rather than sustain surprise military reversals on the ground.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I don't think the problem is they CAN'T defend Pakistan.
I think the problem is they don't want to defend Americans.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Do we have a 51st state over there or what?
I'm sure we'd just love to have some other nation's UAVs crossing our borders and bombing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I kinda thought that we were renting their airspace for a few billion dollars a year.
Edited on Sun May-08-11 08:32 PM by Ian David
I mean they SAID they wanted us to help them bomb terrorists and to catch OBL.

It's like when a dude says, "Hey, get that splinter out of my ass," and then you pay him a billion dollars for the splinter and say, "Okay, I'm gonna pull on three... One... PULL!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. It's like when a dude says, help me bomb your country or else...
...I'll bomb you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. If you don't want your country to get bombed, don't harbor the biggest bomb magnets in the world.
Cause and effect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. ...'"And here's a couple billion dollars to clean-up the mess." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllTooEasy Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let's raid his house next. Wouldn't THAT be a kick in the ass?!

Plus, we'll probably find a bin Laden poster on his bedroom ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. ... the comments in threads like these make me wonder.
It says www.democraticunderground.com in the url, but it reads like FR...

Interesting times indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Astrad Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I agree, that was my thought reading through them
it's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadtotheboneBob Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. to you maybe...
I happen to think President Obama did the right thing... and I also think that the vast majority of Americans do too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Yeah, but Americans aren't really known for their ability to understand world affairs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. You're right, right AND left Americans both tend to have simplistic views of the world.
Reversing the right's delusion that America is the only force for good in the world into a delusion about America being nothing but a force for evil in the world moves right along the axis of lies and approaches no closer to truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. Yes, the stupid is thick.
Once we establish the principle (and we have now well-established it in the last 10 years for sure) that no nation is sovereign, and that any nation can be invaded without recourse by another, then our reasons for complaining about 911 are gone.

What was the problem with 911? Had something to do with foreign folk destroying US property and lives inside the US.

What was the result of the bin Laden raid? Destruction of local property and lives by foreign folk (that's us).

So since 2=2, we no longer have any moral standing for our actions, even for the bloody-minded. I never thought we had any from the beginning. I have not supported, nor do I support, any of the US military actions since I've been alive, and I was born in 1948.

But even the most simple-minded must realize that for sure, now we have forfeited any right to complain no matter who does what on US soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. "We will defend our air space by any means we have:"
We're worried now!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. However, we would still appreciate the billions you send us every month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am a little troubled by the tone of this thread ...
and I agreed and supported the raid on OBL ....

I think they should lose the financial support as we pull out ... But some of the posts here about nuking them and shit ? ...

Cmon .... Are you for real ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadtotheboneBob Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. No Nukes!
I'll agree with ya there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. me, too...
and I did not support the raid. I find the tone of this thread disturbing, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadtotheboneBob Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. A thought to ponder...
Once Obama learned with certainty where OBL was he had to act decisively. Had he not and word leaked that he didn't 'do something', I think it would have been politically disastrous. Someone in the military/intelligence community would have leaked that Obama knew, yet did nothing. Damn'd if ya do, damn'd if ya don't. A tough spot to be in. The raid was better than a cruise missile or a bombing raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Agree. Political viability demanded it.
Of course, the War On Terror™ is mostly a rationalization for U.S. aggression in maintaining empire, the very thing that breeds terrorism to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. I guess he knows what his govt did and can't have any remorse n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. So I guess we can add PM Gilani to the list of Pakistanis who helped hide bin Laden.
You're in no position to stomp your precious little feet and pout, Mister. Your country harbored bin Laden for years, so your options are to acknowledge that fact and either prosecute or hand over the people who helped him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
36. "Don't kill the devil without our permission!"
They would have moved him far away had they known anything about the covert operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC