Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health Care Reform's Legal Battle: Next-To-Last Stage Begins Tuesday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:29 AM
Original message
Health Care Reform's Legal Battle: Next-To-Last Stage Begins Tuesday
Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Tuesday morning marks the next, and perhaps next to last, stage in a legal drama that will determine the fate of President Barack Obama's health care reform law.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit will consider two separate cases, each pertaining to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. The losing parties will appeal whatever determinations are made to the Supreme Court. But the fine print of Tuesday's three-panel decision could have major ramifications on the ultimate ruling, including, perhaps, laying down the legal and political framework for allowing the law to be dismissed or kept in place.

Underscoring the importance of the case, the Obama administration is dispatching Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal to defend the law's individual mandate against accusations that it discriminates against religion and infringes upon state or individual rights.

Officials at the White House and in the Justice Department are, in private, cautiously optimistic about the dual cases, the first of which -- Liberty University v. Timothy Geithner -- will be argued at 9:30 a.m., the latter of which -- Commonwealth of Virginia v. Sebelius -- will begin immediately after.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/09/health-care-reform-legal-battle-final-stage_n_859690.html



This is why I always argue that "Separation of Church and State" is illusory: In reality, Church suffuses State in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would That We Had a Court to Consider the Rationality of Legislation
since it appears unlikely that we will ever get the Constitution back in working order, enforced by the Executive Branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder why folks don't claim a taking of property (ins. premium) without due process.
I'd love to read a legal memo on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who are the judges on the 4th circuit panel?

And can they write an opinion so carefully crafted that even the SCOTUS demagogues and hypocrites (see Scalia, Thomas) can't subvert it and yet again the Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 2 Obama nominees, 1 Clinton nominee on panel, reports the AP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/constitutionality_of_obamas_health_care_law_to_be_reviewed_by_federal_appeals_court_in_va/2011/05/10/AFRs56eG_story.html

"Judges Andre Davis and James Wynn were randomly selected for the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel.

The third judge also is a Democratic appointee. Judge Diana Motz was named to the court by President Bill Clinton. Their names were posted on the court’s website Tuesday morning."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC