Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Treasury to tap pensions to help fund government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 06:56 AM
Original message
Treasury to tap pensions to help fund government
Source: Washington Post

The Obama administration will begin to tap federal retiree programs to help fund operations after the government loses its ability Monday to borrow more money from the public, adding urgency to efforts in Washington to fashion a compromise over the debt.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has warned for months that the government would soon hit the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling — a legal limit on how much it can borrow. With the government poised to reach that limit Monday, Geithner is undertaking special measures in an effort to postpone the day when he will no longer have enough funds to pay all of the government’s bills.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/treasury-to-tap-pensions-to-help-fund-government/2011/05/15/AF2fqK4G_story.html?wpisrc=nl_wonk



The U.S reaches the debt limit. They're using your pension to keep the U.S. afloat now. Yet another of many ways I'm glad I'm Canadian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. First they came for Social Security and I said nothing because I was under 65 and still working.
Then they came for the federal pensions and I said nothing because I wasn't a federal employee. Then they came for Medicare and I said nothing because I had health insurance. Then I turned 65 and I was insolvent and without health insurance and nobody spoke up for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuttgart77 Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. They? What's this "they" business?
The article specifically cites "The Obama Administration".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. No mention of the GOP action to refuse to increase the ceiling. Routine with their man in office.
Edited on Mon May-16-11 09:36 AM by freshwest
No, it's all Obama's fault for trying to keep the dollar from collapsing just the fat cats have been engineering. Remember, they took their money and our jobs offshore. Y

up, blame Obama for that. It's amazing how one man can destroy the whole system the GOP fought like cats and dogs to eliminate every protection to keep this from happening since the days the FDR administration and blamed him for everything in the world.

There is no history of any of that. Nothing to see here, move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #30
65. It's bad chess.
Let the dollar collapse. The GOP is going to have a hell of a time justifying their "fiscal responsibility" come election time when Americans are paying $15 a gallon for gas.

He just gave them more time to play the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #65
71. If your life savings and pension are tied up in a foreign currency, no problem!
Edited on Mon May-16-11 11:09 AM by freshwest
The 'let god sort 'em out' is a GOP meme, not a Democratic one. We end up cleaning the mess left after their shooting spree is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #71
78. You're just playing their game.
We're screwed anyway. The Democrats will eventually cave to Republican demands for massive cuts, in which case WE LOSE ANYWAY. The poor go hungry, the elderly lose their healthcare, and children lose their educations. Oh, and the Republicans score a win, shoring up support from their teabagger base and guaranteeing that they get to stick around for another election cycle.

Let the dollar fall, and the corporations will scream bloody murder. The Republicans will backpedal so fast you'll think they're running in the Amgen. The American people, when gas prices double overnight, will all but stage a rebellion. People will get pretty pissed off when they can't afford to drive to work anymore. The Republicans will end up looking like idiots who put political grandstanding above the well being of the American people. The teabagger political philosophy will be blasted in all political circles.

And you're worried about savings accounts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #78
103. I don't have a savings account worth mentioning and it's not a game. And your hopes for armed
Rebellion won't be carried out by the ones hurt the most and those able to get into the streets will not be attacking the rich. They have the money to protect themselves, it is the ones you may be claiming to represent who will die.

There is no Bastille to storm, the money is offshore. Those who live on these shores have their private security to protect them and plenty more in law enforcment.

The ones you will do all of this cool killing, will be goaded on by the conservatives, paid by them, to kill those who are considered liberal or progressive, or a burden.

Chaos never ends in democracy or equality, except the equality of death and that won't touch these bastards, either. Destroy the government and fascism steps in to take its place. It's already doing so right now, as you say, and it's galloping now.

Because people calling for the last resort because it feels so good for a while, but haven't considered the history of it. The rich win by chaos, they always have. That's what you're arguing for here, not the humiliating job of making things work. Arrogance does not serve the workers.

It's easy to sit at the keyboard and call for havoc, when you don't work with the ones who are going to die, whose faces you know.

EOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #103
116. Why said anything about armed killing?
Not I. Read it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #116
120. Explain your rebellion, then. It's not a game and someone will be armed.
I'm tired of flip statements people, freeper trolls apparently, to just let everything go to hell, Obama bashing as if he's god.

The teabaggers have been preparing for armed rebellion with their militant, shut the government down, my guns everywhere crap.

So maybe I overreacted to you. But I'm pissed, just as intended.

Go in peace, even though we don't agree on some things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. Do you know the definition of the term "all but"?
What I said: "The American people, when gas prices double overnight, will all but stage a rebellion."

"All but" = "almost". I said nothing about actual fighting, or wanting to see a rebellion. Besides, the rebellion I was referring to was political, not military. I happen to believe that there are certain government actions that DO justify armed rebellion, but we're nowhere close to any of those. I'm more of a "block the freeway and shut down commerce" type. :)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/all%2Bbut

And yes, this is a game...to the Republicans. It's their game, and we shouldn't be playing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #122
123. Agreed with all of that. Fighting freepers this weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuttgart77 Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #122
125. Really? Republicans?
I'm sorry, but I'm a man of economics. It's my college major and I can't get away from it. It's what I was taught.


NOW he wants to drill for oil. It was his position not to open land to more drilling earlier.
NOW he wants to open the strategic petroleum reserves to lower prices. Well, is it a supply and demand problem or not?


Watch. You decide for yourself and tell me cuz I'm getting a headache at this point.

32 seconds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNSZ62xiD4M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #65
89. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #89
101. A visit from a McCain voter?
Just so you know..when oil companies drill on American soil, or in our waters, we don't have any special rights to the oil! It goes to the highest bidder. So your argument about allowing more drilling doesn't mean we get cheaper gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #101
106. The Palinistas and teabagger forces arrived this weekend and haven't left yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #101
114. Exactly. Oil companies aren't U.S. companies anymore. They are multinational companies and they act
as if they owe the U.S. nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SFnomad Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
72. Srong dollar policy
We had a strong dollar policy, until Failure-in-Chief Bush was in office. That's when the dollar started it long slow slide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. And when the three branches of government colluded with him to move our money offshore.
Cheney put his money in Euros a long time ago, since he knew and planned with his buddies, to make sure the dollar tanked. The Iraq war was the biggest money laundering operation in the history of the planet. They infected the people with fear and hatred, then paid their friends money stolen from generations of Americans.

While they live it up abroad, we're devouring our own here. Makes you wonder who has the real moral superiority in the end. If we stood up for each other unequivocally, just the way they do for each other, we would be unstoppable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
86. This is the moment the rethugs have been waiting for. They increased
the limit under rethug presidents because they do not want the blame. Now they have the chance to create another disaster so when the American people panic they can use the situation to further privatize government services. Milton Friedman wins again.


See Naomi - I did learn from your book and I am only on Part I. The world had better be learning or the corporations will be the only thing there is other than us peons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
84. Were you a guest on on Sprockets?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysingm Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
95. Here is a warning to us all...
Of course they will not pay it back... the entire federal budget is simply promises and IOU's.

Here is a warning to us all. The Argentine state is taking control of the country’s privately-managed pension funds in a drastic move to raise cash.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/5504137/Argentina_seizes_pension_funds_to_pay_debts_Whos_next/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well this sucks!
Big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. REAL big time suck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Your pensions are now gone!
We would like to thank you for your sacrifice. Now, could you please fucking die?


/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. "to borrow more money from the public"
I think that the 'public', that is, We, the People, should form a bank to monitor this borrowing. Because, in essence, the borrower is writing their own loan note, which sucks for We, the People.

Don't bank on me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. This could easily be solved of they SLASHED THE "DEFENSE" BUDGET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. And end the fucking wars!
...based on lies to benefit the "oil"igarchy.

And tax the fucking rich!

How difficult is it to figure this out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
83. End the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq +
return to 1990s tax rates =




And where was all this debt "concern" when Reagan and the Bushes added $8 trillion to the federal debt?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #83
98. You got my vote!
SOS for POTUS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
104. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #104
113. Investing in small business does NOT "create wealth",
it creates "money" for the investor which is wealth taken out of the small business.

Wealth is created by Value Added labor or services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #104
117. BWAHAHAHA!!!
Man, I haven't heard these canards since the 1980s when Reaganites used them to convince us that "trickle down" would bolster the economy.

We were told "Give the rich tax breaks and they'll invest in the USA" -- it didn't work, did it?
We were told "Give more money to the wealthy and that'll create more jobs" -- it didn't work, did it?

For 30 years now the wealthy have taken their "tax cuts" and invested...in foreign countries and foreign companies.
Or they socked it away in offshore tax havens (UBS Bank in Switzerland alone has 54,000 secret American accounts).

Don't give me this "try getting a job from a poor man" bullshit! If the wealthy had their way, we'd all be "poor men."

I want my money back! That's right, the tax cuts and subsidies they wealthy have taken from me for 30 years. They were suppose to invest in the USA and they didn't. They didn't uphold their end of the bargain. They didn't abide by their terms of the agreement. Now I want my money back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
62. With a Democratic majority composed of these guys instead of Teabaggers, we would have:
There are people working hard on this now:

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70

Forbes magazine said of 'The People's Budget'

"Instead of gutting programs for the poor like Medicaid and Medicare, food stamps, and the new healthcare law, the People’s Budget focuses on cuts in defense. It also doesn’t scrap new financial regulations designed to at least partly stave off another massive financial collapse like the one that put us in this mess in the first place."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #62
87. Only if the "Democratic majority" were true Democrats
We've got to be honest here, a lot of our problems are coming from Blue Dog DINOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #87
109. And those are in districts that listen to GOP talk radio and the GOP message through *their* MSM.
They are simply responding to their constituents, the ones who are raising hell from the local school and on up. The GOP are not attacking any of their messengers on the far right and their voters support them, they don't nitpick. Who is the more powerful political force that they must listen to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #62
93. Some great ideas there
I wish this got more buzz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #93
108. MSM is GOP controlled, they never will. It's up to us. Spread the word locally, so that people will
Demand a better alternative than all this extortion going on now. That is only way to shut these nihilists down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
119. Not even close
2010 defense budget: $663 billion
2010 budget deficit: $1.342 trillion

Eliminating all defense spending would only account for half of last year's deficit.

And then what do we do with the 700,000 government employees and 1.4 million servicemembers suddenly unemployed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Article says that retirees won't be affected since the treasury is legally required to pay it back.
Edited on Mon May-16-11 07:40 AM by BenzoDia
Edit:
Auto spell got me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Pay it backwith what?
If they had the money to pay it back they wouldn't need to "borrow" it.

Face it, it's gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. They borrowed from pensions during Clinton's presidency to keep funding the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
37. Thanks for displaying a brain not operating in a panic or fingerpointing mode. Good morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Like the three plus trillion in current intragovernmental holdings?
Much of which borrowed against Social Security?

Yeah, that'll get paid back. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. They are legally required to pay back Social Security but...
the right wingers and many Dems are trying to screw us. Legality is a fluid thing apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. This is the same BS as when they rob the social security funds. Politicians
generally have a habit of losing the money on its way back ... and give you some IOUs, and have faith in the US's ability to pay it back, as the debt increases. But the MIC will profit and wars will continue. Too many make money off the loses of others. And then we also have the psychopathic element to some politicians now and throughout history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
46. As if they actually care about the rules anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
didact Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
69. LMAO....thanks, that's a good one!
Can I use it??!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
110. maybe... but what about future retirees?
I don't trust these snakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama is attempting to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
Why can't he let the Repukes be the sole owners of the "kill Granny" movement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
60. So, in order to make political points he should stand aside and let them kill granny? Seriously?
There are people working hard on this now. Unfortunately Obama doesn't have the numbers to get this enacted:

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70

Forbes magazine said of this:

"Instead of gutting programs for the poor like Medicaid and Medicare, food stamps, and the new healthcare law, the People’s Budget focuses on cuts in defense. It also doesn’t scrap new financial regulations designed to at least partly stave off another massive financial collapse like the one that put us in this mess in the first place."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #60
77. No, he should tell the repukes to find the money somewhere else
Edited on Mon May-16-11 11:19 AM by Doctor_J
And what is taking the pensions, if not "Kill granny"? What if they use the pension funds up and the teabaggers still don't budge?

He should score political points to kill off the teabaggers next year, or at least render them marginal. These people are savages, and getting rid of them is crucial for salvaging what's left of the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #77
94. The administration is Obama; the Republicans are the majority in the House
You seem unclear on this point. The Repubs do not sign the checks that keep the federal government going; Obama's administration does. It's the Republicans who have cut off the money needed for the checks to clear, and who are trying to force Obama to find the money somewhere else (or to slash government spending).

Yes, they're savages; but that's because it's not them who needs to find the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
88. He believes in sticking to his strengths - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. end the wars you fucking morons!!!
It's not rocket surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
97. You'd think that would be the obvious solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm fucked.
Well, if they wanted to radicalize me, it's working. Play by the rules your whole life and get it stuck up your ass after you can no longer work. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
35. Yep, it's the new American way. Play by the rules and get fucked over for trying to
do all of the "right" things in life. There are millions and millions in this boat anymore and growing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
68. No, and don't let that happen to you. WaPo is playing games with words
to get attention, and you can be confident its readership won't let this go.

'The measure won’t have an impact on retirees because the Treasury is legally required to reimburse the program.'

P.S., I am a Federal retiree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #68
76. Thank you for that post and a lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #76
85. YVW, fresh.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cutting taxes does not
stimulate the economy. Cutting spending does not stimulate the economy. Creating jobs and demand for goods and services stimulates the economy. Raising taxes on the surplus income of upper income brackets and redistributing the money through government spending stimulates the economy. It's time to call these Republican bastards on their threat to ruin the country. The aim to do it anyway. Now is better than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. +100!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. This is the result of 30 years of "trickle down" economics.
It has always been a sham.

End it now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. Raising taxes ... and redistributing through investment to avoid said tax stimulates the economy.
Edited on Mon May-16-11 09:37 AM by ieoeja
Higher tax brackets actually encourages more investment. Were there a 100% bracket, I guarantee I would invest every penny I made in that bracket rather than surrending the entire amount to the government.

But then, I actually write off investment on my taxes. Apparently, Republicans have never heard of that little trick when they make the ridiculous argument that higher taxes will take money away from private investment.

Seriously though, I used to argue with a Republican apartment building owner about taxes. I used to suggest that if he was paying as much in taxes as he claimed, then maybe he just needed a new tax lawyer. Then I bought an apartment building myself. First year, I did my taxes then went to have his lawyer doublecheck my figures. He got it wrong (to my cost). Twice. On the third try he admitted that I had it correct all the time.

I thought I was joking when I suggested he get a new lawyer. Turns out his tax lawyer did suck. So maybe Republicans just hire bad accountants?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
52. +1,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. Exactly, and well said!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
50. Tax cuts for the rich drive wages down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Yes, exactly. This is a big part of why the upper brackets have pulled disproportionately away
from the lower socioeconomic brackets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
111. and why didn't they use their tax breaks to create more jobs
for the past 10 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. to tap federal retiree programs to help fund operations
Edited on Mon May-16-11 08:16 AM by AlbertCat
How about tapping current salaries of Congress since they can't seem to do their jobs?

(besides, they're all independently wealthy anyway)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well they can spend their own retirement on it
But if they spend mine I'm going to be seriously pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yes they better leave that Pentagon budget alone!
Wouldn't want that touched. Oh no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. They must have to stop borrowing from social security.
Now they need another credit card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. what idiots - can they spell infinite defense(sic) spending? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. Sonza Bitches

Thanks for nothing.

Extending W tax cuts for the wealthy and now this?

FUCK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
26. The Republicans Have Got us By the Balls
All they have to do is keep saying NO and they win.

The mess that results from their refusal will be blamed on Obama.
The Mighty Slime Machine (MSM) will make sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Common misconception. Keep lying to yourself, you'll soon believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Except That The Corporate Media Will Never Hold Them Accountable - Look at Birtherism
Edited on Mon May-16-11 09:31 AM by TomCADem
Think Meredith Viera sitting with a big fat smile while Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump claims that the President was born in Kenya.

Being Republican means being able to lie with impunity while the media sits there like a dumb ass nodding along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. True that. Do you think people really believe that crap just because it's on the TV box?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Over 40% Of Republicans, Apparently, Believed This BS Despite The Evidence...
...Can you imagine the percentage of people who are willing to believe something that is a little more debatable than birtherism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. And what can we do about stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
128. There Is No Cure for Stupid
I don't quite see why you call me a liar when you seem to agree with me
that the Repigs control the MSM and the stoopid people believe pretty much anything it says.

The 2010 elections pretty well proved that unpleasant fact as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. It's even spreading to DU, or so last night's posts would indicate, with people griping over ...
What they didn't say, but implied, were welfare queens in ERs, how they and their kids were paying for it, and how their taxes were going to be raised for this and that and on and on. Even this morning the GOP media mantra on not extending the Bush taxes was called raising taxes! The media has certainly done the brainwashing it was paid to do. The GOP spin cycle remains on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
38. Yup, they are being paid by the same bosses, so they know when to shut up and sing.
When they're not lying and laughing like hyenas, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Or raping, lying and thieving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Still, they will never give coverage on the solution, on real news like this:
Edited on Mon May-16-11 09:54 AM by freshwest
Ellison Stumps Republican On House Floor By Asking Him When Paul Ryan's Plan Would Balance The Budget

April 15, 2011

This morning, the House debated the budget proposal put forth by the Congressional Progressive Caucus, a response to the budget drafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). During the debate, CPC member Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) asked Rep. Todd Rokita (R-IN) when the Ryan budget would balance and create a surplus. After hemming and hawing for a few seconds, Rokita ultimately couldn’t come up with an answer:

ELLISON: When does the Ryan budget create a surplus?

ROKITA: The budget proposed and voted on by the committee — <...>

ROKITA: With responsible, gradual reforms to the drivers of our debt, like Medicare and Social Security, this budget will balance –

ELLISON: I asked the gentlemen when the Ryan budget created a surplus. He could have given me a year. He didn’t. That’s because he’s probably embarrassed about when that is. Let me tell you when the Progressive Caucus comes to surplus: 2021. That is known as a responsible budget.

Watch it:

The answer to the question is that the “courageous” and “innovative” Ryan budget would create a surplus for the first time in 2040, according to the Congressional Budget Office. An analysis by the Economic Policy Institute, meanwhile, determined that the CPC budget would indeed turn a $30.7 billion surplus in 2021, nearly two full decades ahead of Ryan’s “bold” plan.

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=49§iontree=6,49&itemid=306

Most of the public doesn't even know this group exists, not even most Democrats, or if they were serious about doing anything except playing the role of Democratic Tea Partiers, they'd be active in presenting that budget here and elsewhere.

We wouldn't be having this discussion if people had not left it all on Obama's shoulders to deal with a hostile GOP majority, mainly created by the same media the GOP owns.

I'm P.O.'d and not at Obama, but at the GOP and those who buy their media's lies. They make progressives have those satisfying feel good moments by throwing us crumbs to make us feel listened to, when they have eliminated any serious discussion that doesn't fit their fascist model.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. this is just one small taste of the poison that is going to roll down the line, gathering momentum &
Edited on Mon May-16-11 09:30 AM by stockholmer
speed as the months and years roll by. Hyperinflation followed by massive deflationary depression or debt default leading to the same, pick your poison, pick your form of collapse.

It's been baked in the cake since December 1913. The systemic controllers are nothing if not chillingly patient and grindingly methodical, as they gain power and wealth in almost all scenarios due to a forced false-choice paradigm of their own making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. The bread and circuses were good while they lasted. Thanks for the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
32. Until We Start To Demonstrate and Demand That The Rich and Oil Companies Get Taxed...
...Republicans will have the upper hand. Are the Republicans getting any blow back for standing up for oil companies subsidies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. No, they have many people working in that business who would kill for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
42. good for you
You got yours!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenzoDia Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
44. Provinces are allowed to borrow from The Canada Pension Plan, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. When SS was robbed they called it 'excusable debt'
None of it was ever paid back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
127. Since the answer to....
Edited on Mon May-16-11 10:25 PM by murphyj87
Since the answer to "Are they talking about abolishing it?" or "Is it anywhere near bankrupt?" is no to both, maybe that is the best way to figure that out.

but yes:

Provinces will be able to borrow from the Canada Pension Plan. The amount will be limited to the proportion of provincial bonds held by other pension funds. The provinces will pay the same interest rate as they do on their other loans.

Whereas US Social Security has never been paid back, let alone with interest, and is essentially gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
45. Should never have extended the Bush tax cuts
This is the end result
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. Should never have made them in the first place, never had Bush in office, etc. Yes, I know.
Still we have alleged Democrats on the board calling not extending them raising taxes, just as the GOP does. While Obama was fighting to keep the tax rates low on the ones that the GOP calls worthless. We either have some media-brainwashed Democrats here, or another infestation of trolls from Freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. Why can't they tap WAR money? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. +1,000,000
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
70. +++++ Yes, why don't we put people first for some change we can believe in.
People instead of the MIC, corporations and billionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
56. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
58. "All ur pension are belong to us." I guess it's
easier than stopping the wars. I guess we should be thankful that we got a kiss while we got fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
59. If President Obama wants to speed the raising of
the debt ceiling process up, he should "borrow" from the Congressional pension fund. We all know that their benefits ARE exorbitant and better packages can not be found in other professions. One term members get lifetime retirement pay almost equal to(or higher?) the salary they were paid (not usually earned) when in office. ONE TERM CONGRESS PEOPLE ! Those who stay on the public and private teat for many terms, are paid retirement amounts higher than their salaries....

THEY along with the TOP 5% ARE A BIG REASON WE ARE GOING BROKE. It is not the average taxpayer who is paid below poverty level retirement benefits (they will never get back what they (we) have paid in) for the remainder of their usually short lives.
It was Patriotic when Ike, Nixon, etc...progressively taxed the wealthy.....why not NOW? Because the wealthy have taken over our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
61. Our government is so fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
63. Dems need to start showing how the pain that retirees
(like the military) will be having is brought to them by the (R)'s. The Dems are so willing to provide the (R)'s cover and this confuses the middle class and working poor.

As Nadar says ... Let the (R)'s show their fangs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
64. Fucking robber barons
this administration will steal from every class, except the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
66. Bad WP headline. No surprise.
'begin to tap federal retiree programs'

'The measure won’t have an impact on retirees because the Treasury is legally required to reimburse the program.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #66
92. As long as they pay it back, like they did Social Security
then it's all good.:shrug:





Oh wait, they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #92
99. They will, unless of course repugs forbid it.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. I'm sure the republicans will be all over paying
it back. And of course the Democrats will make sure they do.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DreamSmoker Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
67. Here is a place to start those drastic Budget cuts...
Many People including me think this is the sweet spot to start drastic cuts...
You could easily cut 80% of the DEA as this is the same percentage used for Cannabis elimination and prosecutions...
http://www.justice.gov/dea/agency/staffing.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
73. I don't think this government has seen the fury of the people
but stealing and corruption has to STOP

Rise up people Rise up

after our pensions then do we go to our assets too

We see the effects of the corruption of Bush and Cheney and Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

and what did we get for it

Bankruptcy Osama's prediction was Bush's minion

the government needs to be replaced ...it is corrupt in both parties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #73
79. Tea instead of coffee, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #73
81. As long as the mass media are left intact, there will be no resistance
if several hundred AM radio stations were suddenly not broadcasting any more, things would begin to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #81
107. Well stated and reflected by some of the freepy comments on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
74. How about charging Disney a REALLY stiff licensing fee
for trademarking Seal Team Six?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
80. Obama has little choice in this.
Edited on Mon May-16-11 11:24 AM by MilesColtrane
The Republicans are threatening to cause a world wide Depression if they don't get what they want.

They are essentially holding a gun to the head of everybody on the planet.

If the government cannot pay its creditors there will be an economic collapse of biblical proportions. It would make the last 4 years look like the roaring twenties in comparison.

It means most banks and companies going under. You and I with no job... not having any money to buy food or pay your rent or mortgage. Or, if you have money, you still can't afford the price of food and housing because prices will increase by hundreds of percentage points.

It means most Americans out on the street and starving to death.

http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/so-what-happens-if-the-united-states-goes-into-default

The debt is not just numbers; it is real money that has been lent with real expectations of returned payment. The debt is owed to multi-national banks, foreign countries, and the public itself through treasuries. If an individual defaults on a loan, the debt does not disappear. Instead, the bank takes the loss. If the United States goes into default, much of the world will suddenly face the prospect of losing about $14 trillion dollars. The results likely will be catastrophic.

Many of the world's largest banks, which are still hardly on solid footing after the 2008 financial crisis, would go bankrupt due to their exposure to the United States. Credit for simple things like houses and car loans may become unavailable as a result. Most large companies use short-term credit to make their payrolls. That credit would disappear, and as a result, many workers would have to start going without a paycheck. There is a very real possibility that people would go to their local bank or ATM and not be able to withdraw cash from their account. Hyperinflation could very likely ensue as the United States dollar becomes basically worthless. The "full faith and credit" of the United States is the only thing holding up the value of the dollar, so when that credit is gone, it is hard to imagine the dollar's surviving with it.

In response to the crisis, businesses would once more lay off workers, only worsening matters and creating a downward economic cycle, which results in a depression. The stock market would plummet as well, negatively affecting the 401(k) accounts of millions of Americans. The price of oil would skyrocket, and with it likely the price of gasoline. Ironically, the only people to benefit may be the firms which invested in the kind of credit default swaps that caused the 2008 financial disaster.

It is this kind of scenario which led White House adviser Austan Goolsbee to declare the mere talk of default "insanity."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. Youhit the nail on the head, and inadvertantly put your finger on the solution
The Republicans are threatening to cause a world wide Depression if they don't get what they want.

They are essentially holding a gun to the head of everybody on the planet.



So that's 300 hundred-odd psychopaths against the 7 billion people of the world. If we would fight back, the battle would be over in less than an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #82
124. In the past every time GOP says U better let us or THIS will happen-turns out
going WITH the GOP GUARANTEES the threatened even HAPPENS.........so if we go along WITH the GOP it WILL create a WORLD-WIDE DEPRESSION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
90. We have two choices:
We can let the dollar fall and have an inflation that will destroy not only the American people but the ability of our country to defend itself in the world.-- It will make us unsafe.

Or we return to the tax rates for the rich that we had in more prosperous times.

Which will it be?

The Republicans have to grow up and make the decision that is best for America. So far their decisions have only benefited the Cayman Islands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetapogee Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #90
121. correct
Good observation, however shrub sr. lost an election after pledging no new taxes and raised them anyway so I think for that reason The President will be very reluctant to raise taxes on anyone before 2012. The opportunity to raise taxes came and went last year and to be honest, we shot ourselves in the foot on this.

As far as who is in the drivers seat, it would appear to this fool that the pukes have a slight advantage moving forward because Obama and especially Senate Dems have to run on results beginning next year. In other words, they have lemons to work with so they need to start making some lemonade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
91. How Bipartisan! Just Give The Republicans Exactly What They Want.
Sounds like a very serious and adult thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
96. Lame
They shouldn't be able to touch pension plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
102. Decline and Fall of the American Empire.
Maybe the barbarians will take over and save us from ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
105. The sooner they have this fight over the debt limit the better off we'll all be. Personally I think
this is political malpractice on the part of the administration because Obama's approval numbers are still pretty high so it's far more likely he'll get what he wants out of this now than if he waits until his numbers go down later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
112. We got Bin Laden. Why not use that to tap the defense budget?
With his approval so high, you'd think the President would be bolder this time. He should say "it's not that I don't care about the debt - but my approach is starkly different than that of the Republicans. I will raise taxes on the very rich, close corporate tax loopholes, and cut the bloat in the defense budget."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
115. Maybe they will offer free courses on street survival 101 ...cause that is where we are all headed.
You've seen the food lines ...get your mind set ready for it because you and your children will be eating there too ...if you are lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
118. All of congress and ex presidents are federal employees, will their pensions be "tapped"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #118
126. Lets hope so..in fact that should be the first chunk to go.
make those bastards sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cayanne Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
129. My husband retires June 30, 2012
He works for the federal government. This will hit us hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC