|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:32 PM Original message |
Ban on checking credit of job applicants clears (Calif.) Assembly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saphire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TimLighter (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. Those exemptions seem really broad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think it's an "and" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeW (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. I dont get the ref to Dept of Justice ... the feds set their own hiring rules irregardless of what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. CA has a state agency with that name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. my credit sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I understand. I know a Woman-Friend that had her identity stolen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dotymed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. It is a violation of our (every state) privacy "right" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. Be a crook, own a bank, and force millions to remain unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. I never understood that pratice...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. It's done for background reasons, basically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. is that the progressive position you're taking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That's the cynical position I'm taking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. Way to go Tony Mendoza |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. Let's hope this becomes law and helps stop this vicious cycle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuttgart77 (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. Does it include those going for a govt security clearance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Possibly still get checked for security clearance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeW (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 05:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Cali would have no say in what the feds use for SC's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 01:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I wouldn't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 08:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I don't think CA grants security clearances do they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. California doesn't have jurisdiction over federal hiring practices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Right, that's why they can't influence security clearance decisions (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. Remember this when California is accused of not being "business friendly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-19-11 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. YAYYYY!!!!!! I hate how you have to have flawless credit to get or do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
20. As an aside to this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
26. California is such a sane state. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-20-11 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
28. Oregon just did this last year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC