Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Target Corp. seeking $116,000 tax refund from the city of Jackson for its store at Jackson Crossing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:57 AM
Original message
Target Corp. seeking $116,000 tax refund from the city of Jackson for its store at Jackson Crossing
Source: Jackson Citizen Patriot

The Target Corp. is trying to get a tax refund of about $116,000 for its store in Jackson Crossing.

The Minneapolis-based corporation has filed petitions with the Michigan Tax Tribunal saying the taxable value of the property is not the $2.9 million assessed by the city of Jackson but was $2.3 million last year and $1.5 million this year.

The petition says the assessment and the taxes are “invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer.”

Assessor David Taylor said if the petitions are granted, Target would reduce its taxes by about $34,000 last year and $82,000 this year.


Read more: http://www.mlive.com/business/jackson-lansing/index.ssf/2011/05/target_corp_seeking_116000_tax.html



The city of Jackson is on the edge of insolvent, but the greedy bastards at Target don't give a shit. That's their idea of community involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck Target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Jefferson Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. F*** the Jackson city government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where's the teagaggers to protest this? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing wrong with this...
Just about every state reaped extra tax revenue from inflated property assessments during the housing boom. Those assessment typically lag the economy and now that the property is worth a lot less, there is no need to pay taxes on an inflated property value that is no longer valid.

If the city in question needs to raise money, they should raise the property tax rate on all commercial property.

Not the best PR move on Targets part, but certainly within the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sprawl-Mart doesn't have this problem
they typically locate their stores about 50 yards outside city limits so they only have to pay county taxes. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Disputing the assessed value of your property is greedy?
That's absurd. Cities sometimes over value property and all taxpayers (individuals and corporations) have the right to dispute it.

Why don't you send some extra cash to the city if you're worried about them? Too greedy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I do.
I pay this city a disproportionate amount of property taxes compared to Target. I don't have the same resources to bear that they do. The city shuts down my request for re-assessment, but Target can send in an army of lawyers to compel the city to reduce their taxes or spend more than that on attorneys.

They will get their way... because they can.

Yes, they are greedy. They want to be free to extract as much money out of the community as they want, but don't want to pay for the infrastructure they use. The costs of that have not gone down. They want a retroactive tax reduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. The balloon bursts.
Edited on Fri May-20-11 12:11 PM by Downwinder
Commercial property here is selling for 25% of appraised valuation.

If it sells at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. What they ask for and what they actually get are two different things.
Corporate Property Tax Appeals are very common, and to be honest, the numbers cited in the OP don't seem all that extreme at a quick glance. Literally, the bigger corporations frequently have an entire department that does nothing except file tax appeals on the various locations they have across the US. Some corporations are nicer than others to interact with, but usually it is all pretty low drama. They present their evidence and the local taxing authorities look at it and make a decision. IF there is still a dispute after that process, there is a next step available at either a state level or in a court room.

I have had discussions with corporate folks about the impact that these filings can have, and many times they really do take into consideration the impact the requested reductions will have on the local communities. I'll never forget a hearing (very early on) with Frito Lay and the local school district. Frito Lay had filed a tax objection and the local school district had intervened. We set up a hearing. The upshot of it all was that the local schools were gonna lose an entire teacher if that reduction was given. Bear in mind, please, that an "entire teacher" was gonna be one of 9 people. This is a very small school district, and that loss was going to have a huge impact.

In that hearing, Frito Lay's representative and the school district reached an agreement that set the property values higher than the appraised value but at a lower value than what the property was assessed at. Frito made the point that they knew that school was where all the employee's kids went, and they wanted to preserve it if at all possible. "We want to be good corporate neighbors but we also want to be valued fairly" was their attitude, and as somebody that deals with property tax appeals, I respect that totally.

There are a few companies I have seen that I lost respect for, but far and away, they mostly are just doing what is within their rights. The property tax system is imprecise, and it does not (nor should it) matter if you are a residential or a commercial property owner--you need to have the right to appeal, and it needs to be taken seriously.



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC