Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WikiLeaks Cache Reveal Pakistan's Role in Drone Strikes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:24 PM
Original message
WikiLeaks Cache Reveal Pakistan's Role in Drone Strikes
Source: The Atlantic

WikiLeaks Cache Reveal Pakistan's Role in Drone Strikes
By John Hudson 09:47 AM ET

A collaboration between WikiLeaks and the Pakistani newspaper Dawn is straining the already tense relations between the U.S. and Pakistan following the secret raid on Osama bin Laden's compound. A trove of previously top secret State Department cables shed new light on Pakistan's role in encouraging U.S. drone strikes in the country. Not only are senior Pakistani officials complicit with the unpopular drone strikes (that's been an open secret for sometime) but the documents reveal officials actively encouraging the bombing missions.

For instance, a cable in 2009 reveals a conversation between a U.S. diplomat and a high-ranking Pakistani official discussing a military operation in South Waziristan. The U.S. official asks if the Pakistani army has enough troops to carry out the mission and "after a long pause" the Pakistani official says that while the Army was likely capable, "the US could assist with continued strikes." Going further, the official advised the U.S. military to employ follow-up strikes immediately after the initial ones occur. “He explained that after a strike, the terrorists seal off the area to collect the bodies; in the first 10-24 hours after an attack, the only people in the area are terrorists,” said a U.S. official. He quotes a Pakistani official as saying "you should hit them again. There are no innocents there at that time." That official also “drew a diagram essentially laying out the rationale for signature strikes that eliminated terrorist training camps and urged that the US do more of these.”

Another leaked cable by then U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson in 2008 reveals U.S. concerns about Pakistani officials being able to stomach the drone strikes, while continuing to lie to their constituents about their complicity. “Pakistani leaders who feel they look increasingly weak to their constituents could begin considering stronger action against the US, even though the response to date has focused largely on ritual denunciation,” writes Patterson.

The new trove of documents dubbed the "Pakistan Papers" comes during a rough patch for U.S.-Pakistan relations. In the days following the bin Laden raid, Pakistani citizens have grown increasingly frustrated with U.S. violations of Pakistan's sovereignty. Though the U.S. and Pakistan recently agreed to put ties back on track, the fact that this was published in Dawn, Pakistan's oldest and most widely-read English-language newspaper, will likely have a large domestic impact.


Read more: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/05/wikileaks-cache-reveal-pakistans-role-drone-strikes/37966/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not really news, IMO.
But K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC