|
Comparing the damage was intense. In the pictures I saw from Joplin there were cars bunched together, homes leveled (with at least one on fire where it had stood. There may well be areas that were much worse.
Moore had whole blocks where there was nothing sticking up except some broken water pipes and trees. Few homes sitting burning 'cause there was no fuel (wood) left to burn, just concrete and dirt. As far as you could see, which was clear across whole housing additions, cars weren't bunched, they were torn out of garages and rolled through homes by the winds. Whole lawns were missing, just bare dirt, remnants of foundations. Tornado shelter doors were ripped off and gone. They found pictures and other objects over 130 miles away. I don't think thee loss of life was as great, but Oklahoma City has put resources into education, warning, and tracking that other cities don't, and that makes a huge difference.
Makes one think about having a shelter in the home that will withstand 300+ mph winds. They built (some with taxpayer money, which I thought was a great investment) a lot of safe rooms after that, cellars, etc., but not nearly enough. Then again, who says one will be home when it hits? We were visiting with our therapy dogs at a hospital and they herded us into tunnels. Damn good place to be, had it come our direction. They don't build like they used to, and I don't mean just the basic structure. Basements are nearly non-existent in new homes, trailer parks don't build community shelters. Even if they did, it would be prohibitively expensive to build to withstand such wind with fairly low odds of ever really encountering that whole force.
Since the 70's, (and I bet the method is true of other midwestern cities) they built hundreds of thousands of homes on concrete slabs, no cellars or other protection. Whole generations rode storms out successfully in the bathroom\bathtub with a mattress draped over them so people got complacent, forgetting these big ones used to happen every few years. I haven't seen any data to tell me that they are actually more frequent or violent, though there is a huge difference in the press, which research tells us induces people to "perceive" they are more frequent or violent. People save thousands of dollars, millions in total, and statistically are quite likely to never be hit by this, but those "safe" places are useful for a variety of other things.
Seems to me, as a country, we have just lost the whole concept of return on investment for the things that are really important.
|