~snip~
Karpinski's account of the letter and the sequence of events as the Abu Ghraib scandal began to emerge contradicts those of her superiors, who have said they did not react to the abuses sooner because it took months for the reports of problems to rise to their level. The first report of abuses at Abu Ghraib was given to Army officials by the International Committee of the Red Cross last November. It was not until January, after an enlisted man working as a guard at Abu Ghraib passed photographs of abuses to his superiors, that senior Army officials began to investigate.
But the letter Karpinski signed rejecting the original Red Cross allegations was written in December. And if, as she insisted Monday, the letter was drafted in part by advisers to Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the U.S. ground commander in Iraq (news - web sites), that strongly suggests the allegations of abuses had already reached Sanchez's headquarters.
~snip~
She said the letter took on several draft forms, and was repeatedly sent back and forth between her command and Sanchez's office of legal counsel -- an assertion borne out at a congressional hearing last week. Finally, she said, she signed the letter.
"I'm aware now that that response was written precisely for my signature, precisely to avoid any discussions about the allegations that the Red Cross was raising," she said.
~snip~
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2026&e=12&u=/latimests/generaloverseeingprisonssaysshewassetupbyarmy