Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA to Probe Missing Mercury (65 tons)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 08:44 AM
Original message
EPA to Probe Missing Mercury (65 tons)
Edited on Sun May-30-04 08:45 AM by maddezmom
EPA to Probe Missing Mercury
Plants Unable to Account for Tons of Annual Purchases
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, May 30, 2004; Page A14


Under prodding from environmental groups, the Environmental Protection Agency is taking another look at a handful of U.S. chemical plants that cannot account for as much as 65 tons of mercury they may be releasing into the environment each year.



The nine chlorine manufacturers that utilize techniques dating to the 1950s have denied they release enough of the toxic substance to endanger public health. But some environmental groups and lawmakers contend the plants may be posing a more serious health threat than the nation's 11,000 coal-fired power plants that together emit 48 tons of mercury every year.

"There's been a tremendous amount of attention on power plants," said Linda Greer, a senior scientist with the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "But there's this sneaky other source that may be as big, if not bigger, that EPA hasn't regulated well at all."

Last December, the EPA issued a new rule to regulate the chemical industry's handling of mercury, but it conceded that the government and industry cannot account for 65 tons of the toxic substance that may be escaping into the environment annually.

Jeffrey Holmstead, an assistant EPA administrator in charge of air policy, confirmed this week that his agency would undertake the review. "Our engineers said we are quite confident that mercury is not going into the air," he said. "Exactly where it's going, we don't know. There's been enough concern about this, we want to go back and see where it's going."

~snip~
more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1485-2004May29.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. 65 fucking tons! And we can't account for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. of course it went into the air and/or water


criminal scum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. reminds me of the WMD's in Iraq
the US knew they were there, just can't find them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. 4 more years of bushco* means...
4 more years of poisoning our planet... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. they deny it -- americans believe them
the state of the american mind these days -- falling hook line and sinker that whatever -- business is on their side even if they poison their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody, somewhere knows, imho. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. maybe we need to interrogate them until they tell us where they are?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadu Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ask any chemical engineer on or near the job site
This is probably the butt of many a running joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's weird
Last night I had a dream that I had this great big oversize thermometer, but it was broken and all the mercury was spilling and I was running around with it trying to figure out how to dispose of it properly, and trying to catch the mercury with the other hand.
And then this morning, there's this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh yeah,
Last night I had a dream that a HAMBURGER was eating ME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Up in my neck of the woods
Edited on Sun May-30-04 10:48 AM by Massacure
They just found 55 gallon drums of toxins a few months ago when they were going to build a soccer field.

I forgot if it was Mercury or not though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Always leave yourself and "out".
"may be escaping into the environment annually"

Of course it "may be escaping into the environment. Then again it could be on Mars.

Where do these dumb$hits think it went?

Nah, I'm sure it's simply a clerical error.

It sure seems big business has been polluting more and getting away with it under the 42nd a$$hole putz *.

Looks like the EPA's new rule regulating mercury isn't a great success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC