Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Critical Report May Have Sped Departure of Tenet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:53 PM
Original message
NYT: Critical Report May Have Sped Departure of Tenet
Edited on Thu Jun-03-04 09:53 PM by gristy
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/04/politics/04REPO.html?hp

By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: June 4, 2004

WASHINGTON, June 3 - George J. Tenet's resignation may have been hastened by a critical, 400-page report from the Senate Intelligence Committee that was presented to the Central Intelligence Agency for comment last month.

Government officials and people close to Mr. Tenet said the classified report was a detailed account of mistakes and miscalculations by American intelligence agencies on whether Iraq possessed illicit weapons before the United States invaded last year. An unclassified version of the report is to be made public this month. Some close to Mr. Tenet said the report was among the factors that led him to resign from a post he had considered leaving for several years.

A senior intelligence official said that Mr. Tenet had neither read nor been briefed on the Senate report. The official described as "bunk" the idea that his departure had been related to the Senate findings.

Officials who have read the report described it as presenting a broad indictment of the C.I.A.'s performance on Iraq. They said its criticisms ranged from inadequate prewar collection of intelligence by spies and satellites to a sloppy analysis, often based on uncorroborated sources, that produced the conclusion that Iraq possessed biological and chemical weapons.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, no, no! He left for personal reasons!
Personal reasons, I tell you!

How diligent are the faultless presstitutes going to be in finding out the real story, and following up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for the PROPAGANDA........NYT!!!!....Read the opposite!!!!
Try again Ass-wh@$#$!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. So the Head of the CIA Had Neither Read Nor Been Briefed on a Key Report
That was specifically ABOUT the CIA?!?

COME ON!

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. total, utter, and complete whitewash......Tenet/CIA get blame for EVERY
thing!

just wait

Isikoff and Pincus were on CNN/Brown tonight, and they're playing that line all the way down the road.

NOT ONE mention of how the intel was CONSUMED

not ONE WORD about Feith/OSP, etc.

NOT ONE FRICKING WORD!!!

then, after they were off, Brown took less than thirty seconds to mention that CHENEY has retained an attorney, and that, oh BTW, the monkeyboy has one, too.....something about that little Plame girl, doncha know

the media is doing their very very best to shovel that story down where the sun don't shine

how they going to ignore the grand jury, though

HUH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC