Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study of Bush's Psyche Touches a Nerve - MUST READ!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:20 AM
Original message
Study of Bush's Psyche Touches a Nerve - MUST READ!!!
Hoooooooooo........MERCY!!!! The best laugh I've had in ages...

"A study funded by the US government has concluded that conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity".

...the report's four authors linked Hitler, Mussolini, Ronald Reagan and the rightwing talkshow host, Rush Limbaugh, arguing they all suffered from the same affliction...

The authors also peer into the psyche of President George Bush, who turns out to be a textbook case..."This intolerance of ambiguity can lead people to cling to the familiar, to arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose simplistic cliches and stereotypes," the authors argue in the Psychological Bulletin."

Full story:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1017546,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. This paragraph says a lot:
"Republicans are demanding to know why the psychologists behind the report,
Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition, received $1.2m in
public funds for their research from the National Science Foundation and the
National Institutes of Health. "

Rather than consider the outcome of the study, they demand to know why it was funded! HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's absolutely typical of Bush + Blair's government.....
They want "experts" to back their opinions.....

"Why the hell did we hire these people if they're not going to tell us what they want to hear??? If we give them another million will they change their mind"

It's like your doctor telling you that you've got cancer and you saying to him, "Now wait one minute - I pay you a lot of money, so you should be telling me that I'm fine."

Unfortunately for US and UK governments, there are still people who look at the FACTS, do RESEARCH and ANALYSIS and then form conclusions BASED ON THEM.

It's like the Blackadder II sketch where the Queen insists that elephants are pink, and when Melchett disagrees she says "Who's Queen?", as if her office makes her infallible.

It would be funny if it weren't so scary.

P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Just to be anal-retentive
It was orange, not pink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. Can't believe I misquoted Blackadder......Hangs head in shame...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. For the sake of argument
What if a similar study had said that liberalism was caused "fear and distrust of authority, antisocial tendencies, and the disbelief in absolute morality?" Mightn't we be interested in the source and its funding? What if it was funded by this Administration?


Hey, I'm just asking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe so, but...
Liberals aren't the ones who have made Hate Radio into the billion dollar industry it is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. 2 of 3
I'd question the 'antisocial tendencies' part, but otherwise, I'd say, yep, probably true. Sounds like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. True, but
that also sounds very much like the repukes who hated Clinton and the government when he was in office. After Selection 2000 they turned into the pro-war, pro-government "patriots" who were willing to beat people up for not conforming to the Bush agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiSmirk Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Antisocial tendencies?
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 11:17 AM by AntiSmirk
Whaaaa? Otherwise, I would not necessarily be offended by your list of things that make liberals tick. I think there is a lot more to it though. Compassion and empathy to name but two.

On Edit: I forgot to mention Fair and Balanced as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. That was very black-and-white of you
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 12:22 PM by Cronus
Surely you knew you would get psychoanalyzed in this thread. And surely you do know that your polar opposition positioning of liberals is flawed and unsound even if it is posited as part of a "they/we do it too" world view. :)

Personally, if someone came up with a "similar" study as you proposed, I wouldn't be asking about the source and funding, I would know it was full of shit no matter how much Republican money was behind it and therefore the questions about funding wouldn't be of much interest. For the record, I also don't care who funded that poodle shit on the sidewalk, I just walk around it.


Fair & Balanced Buttons — The Cronus Connection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Actually, I think you have some good points there.
I am liberal. I do distrust authority and to some degree fear it. I am very social but I do have a disbelief in absolute morality. Humm

Guess you just saved us big bucks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. hey just cause your paranoid
doesn't mean the Government isn't really out to get you, Imagine this you are on a Island with ten rebuplicans but their is only food enough for nine.
Soylent green is people and neomorlocks are GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The truth hurts
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hitler, Mussolini, Reagan, and Limbaugh: the anagrams!
Who's to argue with science? In honor of this groundbreaking study, there was only one thing to do. Feed the four names into Anagram Genius v.9.1.1 for Windows. Looking over 2,500 combinations, these leapt out:


"I'm a huge, subnormal, large nihilist"

"Smallish thug in burlier egomania"

"Ghoulish lamebrain lies maturing"

"Harangue grim slime-bath illusion"

"I am huge, senior, alarming bullshit"


Oh, it goes on and on, but one's my favorite:

"I'm the grueling labia minora slush"

...which just about says it all about such men, doesn't it? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. I am huge, senior, alarming bullshit........SUPERB!
LMAO!

P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. "aversion to shades of grey"
HAHAHAHA!! Been chuckling at this for years! Good to see it get the recognition it deserves!

Diametrical polarization is for simpletons!

Love it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. Dualism is for people who
can't imagine the rainbow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Scarbouro was appolectic about this on his show last week
The only episode of 'Scarbouro' that I've ever watched, covered this study.

Scarbouro had some California professor on, defending and explaining the study, and Scarbouro tried brow-beating the professor, but just ended up looking like a fool.

The professor told Scarbouro that Scarbouro was a good example of those dogmatic right-wingers in the study. Scarbouro looked like quite a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Oh, that's RICH!
"Thank you, Mr. Scarborough, for supporting my thesis with your mouth-frothing..."

I would have loved to have seen that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Scarborough
Isn't he the Congressman who had a dead intern in his office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. "The professors have ideas;...
...the rest of us have emanations of our psychological needs and neuroses."

will is saying psychology is invalid because psychologists are human. or, in other words, anyone who is neurotic, or has a neurosis, cannot have an valid idea.

i think he proves the point of the article on intolerance of ambiguity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Flaw in This Study:
Allows Conservatives to be within "general human dimensions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Yes
I'm a little disappointed- I always thought conservatism was a mental illness. Now I find it is only part of the human dimension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. thanks Pert_UK,.... BA..hahahaha
repuklikan motto,, " I've got mine, to hell with you"

I truly hate pukes :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. It’s important to remember that these are sick people.
There is hope! A cure may already exist. Back in the 60’s conservatism was treated and often cured with the steady use of medicinal cannabis and an occasional dose of LSD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Welcome to DU
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thanks glad to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidMS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. LOL!
May sugest useing the psychratic drug of choice today: MDMA (AKA Extacy)

Conservatism is treatable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. from the article
"Another author, Arie Kruglanski, of the University of Maryland, said he had received hate mail since the article was published" . . . nicely providing further confirmation of the study's conclusions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. a relatively common...
... disorder in psychiatric patients is called "splitting". People who suffer from splitting cannot have a neutral opinion about other people, they are either exalted or demonized.

This is a common, component of disorders such a "borderline personality disorder", and I believe other syndromes as well.

It seems like it is kind of like a steroid-version of the inability to deal with ambiguity and nuance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neutrino Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's like I always said, Bush isn't a bad guy--he's just crazy.

The glass is half empty or half full. It's the half-empty
part that we have to worry about. poor baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. I thought they were just all constipated moneygrubbers
now I see they are constipated neurotic moneygrubbers. Makes sense to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I still believe he has Tourette Syndrome and is Antisocial Psychopathic
I do believe that Cheney is Anti-Social and is a Pathological
liar to the max. He also suffers from a severe case of paranoia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapper914 Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is this the same study from a few weeks ago?
That one was attributed to UC-Berkley. Conservatives immediately dismissed that one due to the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes it is. Here's a link for all who may be interested.
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 05:23 PM by 94114_San_Francisco
The Berkeley link:

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml

The title of the study is "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition"...see link for more details.

Another interesting link on how this "mindset" affects communication (Bush specifically) was published in 'The Nation' (A Nation of Victims by Renana Brooks) on 6/30/03...here's that link:

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030630&s=brooks

It's also a great read!
:kick:

edit: subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC