Congress to restrict use of Special Ops

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030813-120409-8659r.htm

Congress is set to impose new restrictions on the use of Special Operations Forces that for the first time will require a presidential order before deploying commandos in routine but hidden activities.

The restrictions are contained in the classified Senate report accompanying the current version of the intelligence authorization bill for fiscal 2004.

The restrictions were added to the report by members of the Senate Intelligence Committee after consultations with Stephen Cambone, the defense undersecretary for intelligence, according to current and former U.S. officials and documents obtained by The Washington Times.

The new rules, if contained in the final version of the bill, would add a burden to the military's deployment of Special Operations Forces by requiring the Pentagon to first obtain a presidential "finding," or directive, similar to those required for covert-action intelligence operations.

--snip--

A senior U.S. intelligence official said the new report language undermines the efforts of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet to loosen restrictions on covert action in the war on terrorism since the September 11 attacks.

The new rules, if contained in the final version of the bill, would add a burden to the military's deployment of Special Operations Forces by requiring the Pentagon to first obtain a presidential "finding," or directive, similar to those required for covert-action intelligence operations.

Phew! I was gettin' all worried 'n stuff there for a minute. But, golly, now that the president has to issue a directive before any more Special Forces are deployed, I can sleep soundly knowing that such monumental decisions are in the hands of our great leader.

Bring 'em on!

Such a law would eliminate one method for Bush* to maintain "plausible deniability". Under this proposed law, Bush* would have to take "personal responsibility" for their actions.

I'm glad he took "personal responsibility" for the Niger lie. Yeah, he really paid the price for that one, huh. :)

Bush* was able to blame the SOTU lies on others. If he signs his name to a Pres. Finding, there's no way he can duck it

puts more controls in place