Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Union Sues Verizon, Citing Wire-Tap Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
VaLabor Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:07 PM
Original message
Union Sues Verizon, Citing Wire-Tap Rules
Union Sues Verizon, Citing Wire-Tap Rules
Tue August 19, 2003 07:19 PM ET

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - The Communications Workers of America on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Verizon Communications Inc. VZ.N , saying the telephone company improperly monitored a conference call with reporters.

The lawsuit lobbed a public complaint against Verizon as contract negotiations crawled forward. Bargainers for Verizon and two unions met in Washington to dissect details of contentious issues such as job security and the transfer of work to low-cost regions. Talks will continue on Wednesday.

In the lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the CWA contended that two Verizon executives violated wiretap laws by monitoring an invitation-only conference call reserved for reporters.

The union said it believes the executives listened to the call without announcing their presence and relayed the meeting's content to other company officials. A copy of the lawsuit was obtained by Reuters.

"This is nonsense and it's harassment," said Verizon spokesman Eric Rabe.

"The CWA put out an invitation to this conference call that was widely available. People from Verizon identified themselves when they called in and they were admitted to the call," Rabe said.

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?

The lawsuit also outlined some back-and-forth bickering over the use of the phrase "Can you hear me now?," which is the advertising slogan used by Verizon's wireless unit.

The union previously had agreed to stop using that slogan in its public campaigns against layoffs at the company. The CWA said that the restriction did not apply to an occasional remark by individual union employees, the lawsuit said.

Verizon contended that a CWA executive had improperly used a variation of the "Can you hear me now?" phrase during the conference call. The company sought a ruling in federal court to hold the union in contempt, the lawsuit said.

The CWA denied violation of the agreement.

TALKS TO CONTINUE


MORE:
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=3304419
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. When talk is spoken but not heard, how can it continue? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC