Wash Times: U.S. miscalculated security for Iraq

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030827-114516-5938r.htm

Top Bush administration officials grudgingly acknowledge that their post-Saddam Hussein plan for rebuilding Iraq has been substantially flawed on the security front.

Some defense officials said privately in interviews that the plan in place for security after Baghdad's fall has been an utter failure. They said it failed to predict any significant resistance from Saddam loyalists, much less the deadly combination of Ba'athist holdouts and foreign terrorists preying daily on American troops.

"Every briefing on postwar Iraq I attended never mentioned any of this," said a civilian policy adviser.

--snip--

Officials say the prewar miscalculation is providing a new opportunity for the Bush administration. Iraq, like Afghanistan, has become a battlefield for fighting violent Muslim fundamentalists. A second U.S. victory in Iraq, after toppling Saddam, would deliver a significant defeat to Islamist terrorists and perhaps lessen their appeal in the Arab world, officials believe.

Don't you just love the spin from these jerks? They're madly trying to make lemonade.

And out of sight, out of mind - to the US Media

So 290 Iraq US military deaths, perhaps 50 more Brit/Dane

1200 US Military lost limbs etc but we just call it wounded - they are not "casualties"

7,800 reasonably verified Iraq civilian dead
20,000 estimated armless, etc Iraq civilian wounded.
10,000 to 45,000 Iraq military dead in US produced mass graves you may not take a photo off.
10,000 Iraq military wounded estimated.

And now "combat deaths only since May 1" is the only worry to Bush and our media - and of course the fact the 480 Billion deficit is after stealing $150 billion from Social Security and does not even include the estimated 100 billion for Iraq - no wait a minute - our media does not care about that either. The real question is do Democratic Presidential candidates change their position on issues over time in response to changed data - and how to let the public know that - unlike never changing Bush - this is EVIL WAFFLING!

n/t

all the Money they were going to make.

which their trained monkeys have taken to repeating is that the plan all along was to get all the Islamic terrorists together in one place like a big convention and kill 'em all.

If I were a Repug, where would I go to pick up my daily list of talking points? God, that would be so much easier than having to use my brain!

these clowns can be charged a fee to read du, for example whoever said:

"Every briefing on postwar Iraq I attended never mentioned any of this," said a civilian policy adviser.

could have learned a lot from du 'cuz every single time i've logged on, there's been plenty of mention of all of this.

"Every briefing on postwar Iraq I attended never mentioned any of this." (What in the hell?!?)

No wonder they can't think straight. They're so deep in spin that they can't even turn out a simply sentence.

Every meeting never did, indeed. Fucking imbeciles.

that Iraq was made up of many contending populations and groups; that Iraq was an artificial construct that always threatened to fly apart; that an invasion would foster hate and terrorism; that an invasion would make much of the rest of the world hate the U.S. They didn't listen. Now, they can wallow in their mistakes -- but those who suffer are the Iraqi people and the troops we and Britain sent to Iraq.

Everything else was perfect: the reasons to go to war, the war, the diplomacy, the carrier landing, the statue toppling. So, other than 16 words in SOTU and this ...uh...security, everything was OK. Yeay!

Is that what they are saying?? Somehow I don't think the American people will think that is acceptable behavior.