Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Q&A: Europe's Galileo project

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:43 PM
Original message
Q&A: Europe's Galileo project

Q&A: Europe's Galileo project
By Jonathan Amos
BBC News science reporter

Europe is building its own satellite-navigation system called Galileo. BBC News looks at why such a network is deemed necessary when we already have the US Global Positioning System (GPS).

What is Galileo?
,
,
,
Like Airbus and the Ariane rocket programme, the new sat-nav system will assert Europe's independence. It will give EU countries guaranteed access to a service that is currently provided by a foreign (US) power.

GPS is a military-run programme; its signals can be degraded or switched off. Yes, the service is free, but its continuity and quality come with no guarantees - which means it cannot be relied upon, certainly not for safety-of-life applications such as landing planes and controlling trains.

Galileo will be a civil system. It will be run by a private consortium and will offer guaranteed levels of service.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4555276.stm

-------------------------------------------

Can't blame the rest of the world for deciding they can't count on the US. They know the GPS system can be cut off for any or even no reason. The EU is asserting it doesn't need the US. Good for them. If we were real friends to the EU, the EU wouldn't feel the need to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't trust us anymore ...
and I don't blame them. :-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you blame the Europeans? With the Nuts we have....
..running this country, I wouldn't trust the USA to bring me a Donut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. GPS is a warfighing system no
matter who owns it. No one wants to have the guidance for their weapons turned off.

GPS is currently used in 7 body jets in addition to RLG navigation systems. GPS is used by surveyors and maritime navigation with extreme precision. GPS can be managed by regions.

They are just selling a weapon system to their public.

Nothing wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No... GPS is (regardless of the rules) great on a golf course
Edited on Sun Dec-25-05 11:20 PM by Gman
and finding to where you want to drive your car. It has war applications but is NOT solely a warfighting system. The whole point here is that the rest of the world doesn't trust it's old and former friend, the United States of America. I for one don't blame them one bit. The United States is now a rogue country that no one, especially Americans, can trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You have it backwards.
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 02:36 PM by emperor72
It is first a war fighting system. Period. Just as our highways are transport systems for our military.

Then, it is also a consumer nicety, where applicable.

I have several applications that use GPS, however I would not be the least bit surprised if the government decided that I was no longer entitled to its data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's a higher spec than GPS
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 02:53 PM by TheBaldyMan
it's not really a case that the EU doesn't trust the US. It's a very accurate (<1 metre) civil system and you don't need military clearance to get a high accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
architect359 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good for 'em
Systems like GPS that the whole world has now come to depend on shouldn't be solely controlled by any one entity. This'll be like a redundant system...plus it'll prevent all the potential abuses that a monopoly could give rise to. Sort of off topic but I hope that this move will also give momentum to creating another internet network that's been talked about - again, so that not one source can have full control (in this case, free flow of information).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC