Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This could scarcely be clearer - Molly Ivins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 05:43 AM
Original message
This could scarcely be clearer - Molly Ivins
Edited on Wed Dec-28-05 05:51 AM by cornermouse
The first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. Thirty-five years ago, Richard Milhous Nixon, who was crazy as a bullbat, and J. Edgar Hoover, who wore women's underwear, decided some Americans had unacceptable political opinions. So they set our government to spying on its own citizens, basically those who were deemed insufficiently like Crazy Richard Milhous.

For those of you who have forgotten just what a stonewall paranoid Nixon was, the poor man used to stalk around the White House demanding that his political enemies be killed. Many still believe there was a certain Richard III grandeur to Nixon's collapse because he was also a man of notable talents. There is neither grandeur nor tragedy in watching this president, the Testy Kid, violate his oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of our country.

The Testy Kid wants to do what he wants to do when he wants to do it because he is the president, and he considers that sufficient justification for whatever he wants. He even finds lawyers like John Yoo, who tell him that whatever he wants to do is legal.

The creepy part is the overlap. Damned if they aren't still here, after all these years, the old Nixon hands -- Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the whole gang whose yearning for authoritarian government rose like a stink over the Nixon years. Imperial executive. Bring back those special White House guard uniforms. Cheney, like some malignancy that cannot be killed off, back at the same old stand, pushing the same old crap...

Oops. :blush:

http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/1/2005/1284
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love Molly Ivins
but would appreciate a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Molly was probably one of the first lines they tapped.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Have you ever talked to Molly?
They got an earful, I'm willing to wager! She is fabulous though, isn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was sort of funny when Nixon wanted the imperial guard
We all thought it was like some German ruler. We were sure his Quaker teaching did not take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Ah, the power of coincidence
Just this morning I was reading of how Nixon designed new uniforms for the white house guard detail, complete with gold-trimmed tunics and peaked Prussian hats. It actually occurred, then people saw how really lame it looked and it was quietly withdrawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. ''the whole gang whose yearning for authoritarian
government rose like a stink over the Nixon years.''

truer words were never spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Richard Nixon
would win the Democratic Nomination for President in 2008.

And he would win.

that's how far to the Right this country has moved.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. As always
excellent article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. She saved the best zinger for last--the "I" word
This could scarcely be clearer. Either the president of the United States is going to have to understand and admit he has done something very wrong, or he will have to be impeached. The first time this happened, the institutional response was magnificent. The courts, the press, the Congress all functioned superbly. Anyone think we're up to that again? Then whom do we blame when we lose the republic?

Go, Molly, go!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't see shrub admitting he was wrong and stopping this travesty
but I also don't see a republican controlled congress impeaching him. Our only hope is to take back congress and then impeach him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamyrlin79 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And vote-rigging makes this a near impossibility
Yeah, take back congress in '06. Riiiiiiiight.

Forgive me if I'm skeptical. Dems would have to have a lot more chutzpah than they do now to even have half a chance at taking back control of even ONE chamber of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is a major current of political thinking
particularly among Texans that is profoundly antidemocratic and un-American. The Shrub has drunk deeply from that stream. Molly Ivins would know having borne witness to this plague for many years. Unfortunately, she often highlighted its comedic features when it has proved to be decidedly unfunny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slyder Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Texas should go
I have always thought that Texas should politely be asked to leave the Union. Could we give it back to Mexico? Texas tried to leave the Union in 1861. This should have been permitted to occur peacefully. I would even be in favor of letting them take the little pieces of Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, and New Mexico with them. American republican values have never really taken root in Texas. It is a gaudy parade of control freaks in high-heeled boots with funny hats stoned on testosterone and booze. Or at least this what I see on TV at football games and what they send to Washington, D.C.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you for posting. Already sent the link to friends.
Ivins at her very best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. The women speak! What would we do without Molly, Helen,
Arianna and even Maureen? Go, girls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC