Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retraining Laid-Off Workers, but for What?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:56 AM
Original message
Retraining Laid-Off Workers, but for What?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/business/yourmoney/26lou.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all

Layoffs have disrupted the lives of millions of Americans over the last 25 years. The cure that these displaced workers are offered — retraining and more education — is heralded as a sure path to new and better-paying careers. But often that policy prescription does not work, as this book excerpt explains. It is adapted from "The Disposable American: Layoffs and Their Consequences" by Louis Uchitelle, an economics writer for The New York Times. Knopf will publish the book on Tuesday.

<snip>

Saying that the country should solve the skills shortage through education and training became part of nearly every politician's stump speech, an innocuous way to address the politics of unemployment without strengthening either the bargaining leverage of workers or the federal government's role in bolstering labor markets.

But training for what? The reality, as the aircraft mechanics discovered, is painfully different from the reigning wisdom. Rather than having a shortage of skills, millions of American workers have more skills than their jobs require. That is particularly true of college-educated people, who make up 30 percent of the population today, up from 10 percent in the 1960's. They often find themselves working in sales or as office administrators, or taking jobs in hotels and restaurants, or becoming carpenters, flight attendants and word processors.

<snip>


The Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics offers a rough estimate of the imbalance in the demand for jobs as opposed to the supply. Each month since December 2000, it has surveyed the number of job vacancies across the country and compared it with the number of unemployed job seekers. On average, there were 2.6 job seekers for every job opening over the first 41 months of the survey. That ratio would have been even higher, according to the bureau, if the calculation had included the millions of people who stopped looking for work because they did not believe that they could get decent jobs.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wal-Mart greeters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good Article
But I am surprised that no one was retrained to be an auto-repair body person, welder, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly, I have three job openings for auto techs.
We are offering $18.00 hour plus benefits and I can't find QUALIFIED techs. I recently started one tech at $18.00 and hour. He showed up on Monday with his tools worked all day and was a no show no call all week. He doesn't respond to repeated phone messages and I can't locate him. Really strange, and very troublesome because we are adding a night shift fleet service and will need to find another 3 to 6 techs in the coming couple of months. I can find well qualified managers and sales persons galore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You are a good example for many of us
How can we find ways to get more workers retrained for jobs such as yours? Also, we need more handy men around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. To work at sweatshops, locked in, to die in fires (several recently in
Bangladesh killed dozens).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, if there is one job for every 2.6 workers,
Not including discouraged workers, that comes out to 61.5% unemployment. Only one person can get that job, that leaves 1.6 people without jobs, which gets you 61.5%. But of that 61% some get lower paying, unskilled jobs.

"So the demand for jobs is considerably greater than the supply, and the supply is not what the reigning theory says it is. Most of the unfilled jobs pay low wages and require relatively little skill, often less than the jobholder has. From the spring of 2003 to the spring of 2004, for example, more than 55 percent of the hiring was at wages of $13.25 an hour or less: hotel and restaurant workers, health care employees, temporary replacements and the like.

That trend is likely to continue. Seven of the 10 occupations expected to grow the fastest from 2002 through 2012, according to the Labor Department, pay less than $13.25 an hour, on average: retail salesclerks, customer service representatives, food service workers, cashiers, janitors, nurse's aides and hospital orderlies."

The only way this trend will change is if the United States is no longer a market for cheap goods and products. When we get down to a standard of living equal to what India and China have right now, then we will get our jobs back but at about $250 a month. Oh happy days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's good to see in print from someone with expertise in the field
what a lot of us have believed all along.

Thanks for posting the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
APPLE314 Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. AS VOTING MACHINE MECHANICS
Dollar for Dollar you get the most value out of training someone to manipulate electronic equipment. This is cheaper than buying votes, and immensely more intellectually rewarding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. It seems that in the ultra-specialization game,
retrainers should do well, at least as well as the casinos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC