Posted on Fri, Jun. 02, 2006
COMMENTARY
Al Gore stands by the truth
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Columnist
snip...
Even as the usual suspects describe well-founded concerns about global warming as hysteria, they issue hysterical warnings about the economic consequences of environmentalism. “Al Gore’s global warming movie: Could it destroy the economy?” Fox News asked.
Well, no, it couldn’t. There’s some dispute among economists over how forcefully we should act to curb greenhouse gases, but there’s broad consensus that even a very strong program to reduce emissions would have only modest effects on economic growth. Though some industries would lose jobs, others would gain.
Actually, the right’s panicky response to Gore’s film is probably a good thing, because it reveals for all to see the dishonesty and fearmongering on which the opposition to doing something about climate change rests.
But “An Inconvenient Truth” isn’t just about global warming, of course. It’s also about Gore. And it is, implicitly, a cautionary tale about what’s been wrong with our politics.
Why, after all, was Gore’s popular-vote margin in the 2000 election narrow enough that he could be denied the White House? Any account that neglects the determination of some journalists to make him a figure of ridicule misses a key part of the story. Why were those journalists so determined to jeer Gore? Because of the very qualities that allowed him to realize the importance of global warming many years before any other major political figure: his earnestness, and his genuine interest in facts, numbers and serious analysis.
more...
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/business/14720256.htm?source=rss&channel=kansascity_business