Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New news about Diebold in MD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:29 AM
Original message
New news about Diebold in MD
I am posting this for Alex35332 who is a newbie with a good contribution to make. here is the news release:

PRESS RELEASE: TrueVoteMD.org CONTACT: Alex Zeese
June 2, 2006

SBE Responds to Calls for Independent Testing of Diebold Machines By Hiring a Diebold Apologist Rather then a Security Expert to Conduct Tests.
TrueVoteMD Calls Review a "Whitewash in the making"

Montgomery County: Over the past five months, a Finnish security expert Hari Hursti has tested Diebold voting systems used in many states. He found serious security vulnerabilities both in the software, PCMCIA cards that record votes and in the procedures surrounding the voting machines. One of these vulnerabilities was detected by a Maryland security assessment two years ago, but Diebold never fixed the vulnerability. The newest attack is so serious that experts are afraid to talk about its details publicly.


As these security vulnerabilities became known the Governor expressed his view that he no longer trusted the machines. Candidates and citizens called for independent testing of the machines and John Hopkins Computer Expert Avi Rubin challenged the State Board of Elections to find computer scientists who would verify that the system is secure.

In response to this widespread pressure from citizens, voting security experts and political leaders, including TrueVoteMD, The Maryland State Board of Elections recently hired Freeman, Craft and McGregor Group Inc., to do an assessment of Diebold’s voting system security. However the selection of this Florida firm to do the analysis has itself raised questions.

Paul Craft is a partner in Freeman, Craft and McGregor. “We did some research into Paul Craft’s firm and have serious concerns as to their qualifications as security experts. There has been a lot of criticism of Mr. Craft in regards to the weakening of security procedures during the time he was assisting NASED in creating voting system standards in 2005,” said Alex Zeese of TrueVoteMD.org. “ We have some of the best computer experts in the country right here in Maryland who have been very critical of the Diebold machines. The SBE should have had these well-qualified critics test the machines in order to restore confidence of voters and political leaders. The selection of this group is a whitewash in the making. With this firm conducting the test the outcome is predictable."

TrueVoteMD has compiled research into Freeman, Craft and McGregor, which shows a history of favoritism towards the Diebold Corporation and a failure to recognize the seriousness of security flaws. Mr. Craft, in particular, was involved in the revision of the national voting system standards. He consistently advocated relaxing standards in favor of the machine manufacturers. Another partner, Steve Freeman, was hired by the state of California to check for problems on their voting machines, after Maryland released the RABA report. The RABA Report raised concerns about the security of the GEMS Tabulators, that tabulate the results from all the machines in a precinct/county. Despite the risks reported by RABA and CompuWare, Freeman has repeatedly recommended the tabulators.

TrueVoteMD has published a summary of concerns about the group picked on line at: http://truevotemd.org/content/view/474/82 /
It is also below
###
Alex -www.TrueVoteMD.org-www.VotersForPeace.US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I voted absentee in MD to get it on PAPER. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But was it counted? nt K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. But
I thought MD passed paper ballot legislation already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex35332 Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nope
Sorry Dude, the MD Senate Democrats killed the bill, it passed the House, then the Republican Gov swapped sides came out in favor of it and the Senate Dem's killed it cold. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC