Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us (Feb 22, 2004)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:06 AM
Original message
Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us (Feb 22, 2004)
Remember this??? How can those who supposedly strong on national security claim global warming is a myth??? Oh, yeah, they're living in a faith-based world rather than a reality-based world (see Suskind's NYT article to be found here

http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/sloth/2004-10-16b.html

The pentagon and global warming--

http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,12374,1153530,00.html

Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us

· Secret report warns of rioting and nuclear war
· Britain will be 'Siberian' in less than 20 years
· Threat to the world is greater than terrorism

Mark Townsend and Paul Harris in New York
Sunday February 22, 2004
The Observer


Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters..
A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.

The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.

much more....

Symons, who left the EPA in protest at political interference, said that the suppression of the report was a further instance of the White House trying to bury evidence of climate change. 'It is yet another example of why this government should stop burying its head in the sand on this issue.'

Symons said the Bush administration's close links to high-powered energy and oil companies was vital in understanding why climate change was received sceptically in the Oval Office. 'This administration is ignoring the evidence in order to placate a handful of large energy and oil companies,' he added.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Money for the rich
VS our lives,for these decadent thugs in their secret gated communities we all are expendable as long as they win,and they got theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. good article but 2 years old, not that anything has gotten better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stunning articles, both of them.
Thanks for posting these; I'd missed them both, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just had this discussion with a bushbot over the weekend.
Of course she didn't believe any of it. It's from one of those socialist European papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. there are other sources for the pentagon report
My son told me that one of his colleagues who was, at best, neutral about global warming, decided that if the pentagon believed it and was 'gaming' scenarios about its effects on US military security he better take it seriously himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep - even a couple of my liberal family members eyebrows were raised when
they heard about the Pentagon twist. Ubber-scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Relax--it's only science.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC