Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

King George, the eavesdropper: If any presidential idea deserves a day in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 03:05 AM
Original message
King George, the eavesdropper: If any presidential idea deserves a day in
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 03:06 AM by lindisfarne
court, it's this one. (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
http://www.startribune.com/561/story/498327.html

Published: June 17, 2006
Figure this one out: The U.S. government can't be asked to justify its secret eavesdropping on American citizens, it says, because the reason for such spying is a secret itself. That's more or less what a Bush administration attorney told a federal judge last Monday in urging dismissal of a challenge to the National Security Agency's domestic eavesdropping scheme. Given what's already known about its skulking wiretapping program, hiding behind the "state secrets" shield may be the Bush administration's best bet.
Best, but not good enough. The whole point of the American Civil Liberties Union's case against NSA eavesdropping is that no government may operate by secret presidential decree. Filed in Detroit on behalf of journalists, scholars, lawyers and nonprofits who say the prospect of official eavesdropping has harmed them, the suit assails this warrantless surveillance as the legal outrage it is. For starters, says the ACLU, the program flouts the Fourth Amendment's command that government may not spy on Americans without court permission. And as the suit notes, it also ignores a federal law barring U.S. officials from domestic spying even to obtain foreign intelligence -- unless they first secure a warrant from a special court.

The administration is only too willing to acknowledge such legal sidestepping -- but insists it's no big deal. Why not? In wartime, the White House argues, the president is constitutionally entitled to do whatever he deems necessary to defend the country -- including shrugging off the law -- without submitting to any sort of oversight.

What will King George think of next? Today he's invoking the theory -- and the endless, ubiquitous "war on terrorism" -- to justify warrantless spying on innocent Americans. And tomorrow? Why not an executive edict for house-to-house searches, or a suspension of the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, or the tidy establishment of a virtuous and upright state religion?

<snip>
Welcome to the world beyond the looking glass -- where the president is king, a war prevails eternally and the rule of law applies only to some. How long until the beheadings start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC