http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/20/AR2006062001320.htmlRumblings are that the White House is looking for ways to keep controversial U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton in his post well beyond the expiration of his recess appointment at the end of this year.
One possibility is to bring his nomination up for vote in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee next month. Bolton supporters on the Hill first want to pass the defense appropriations bill before they leave for the August recess and say they did everything needed for the troops -- body armor, equipment and such -- before they turned to the nomination. Senate Republicans don't want wait until the fall and risk a potential loss right before the midterm elections.
On the other hand, sources on both sides of the aisle say even if Voinovich supports Bolton, it appears most unlikely the nominee would get the 60 votes needed to overcome a Democratic filibuster.
Bolton's recent dust-up with U.N. Deputy Secretary General Mark Malloch Brown , who had criticized the United States for lack of support for the organization, may not have helped the equation. The fight rallied the Senate's conservative base, one source said, but it may have alienated moderates because Malloch Brown is a Brit and a de facto member of the coalition of the willing. Now, if he had been French . . .
The White House can re-recess-appoint Bolton. But federal law would bar him from being paid. He could work for free, though. And some Bolton supporters are taking a hard look to see if there's wiggle room in the federal law, we hear, along with other alternatives. Seems difficult, some observers say, but don't sell the pro-Bolton forces short.
MORE LITTLE TIDBITS IN THIS COLUMN FOR YOUR PLEASURE AND INFO