Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Ruling Second in a Week Against Bush’s ‘Illegal’ Attack Against Work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 02:40 PM
Original message
Court Ruling Second in a Week Against Bush’s ‘Illegal’ Attack Against Work

Full story: http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/06/28/court-ruling-second-in-a-week-against-bush%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98illegal%e2%80%99-attack-against-workers

Organizing & Bargaining, Legislation & Politics, Bush & Co.


Court Ruling Second in a Week Against Bush’s ‘Illegal’ Attack Against Workers

The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia tossing out Bush administration workplace rules for 160,000 Department of Homeland Security workers is the second blow in a week against the Bush administration’s attack on the workplace rights of federal workers.

Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to ban the Department of Defense from implementing similar workplace rules that gut collective bargaining and civil service rights for more than 700,000 workers.

(Yesterday, a three-judge federal appeals panel said the new personnel system “does not even give the illusion of collective bargaining,” and that parts of it “are simply bizarre.”)


In 2004, the Bush administration announced plans to radically revamp federal personnel rules for the entire government. The Homeland Security and Defense departments’ rules are considered the Bush models for the entire government.

The appeals court wrote that the new Homeland Security personnel system the Bush administration unilaterally imposed on the workers last year:

Not only defies the well-understood meaning of collective bargaining, it also defies common sense.

The Homeland Security rules would replace civil service pay grades and promotion rules and limit the issues that can be discussed in contract bargaining by taking pay and work rules off the table. The court said:

The obvious problem is that very few of “conditions of employment” are subject to meaningful bargaining and the very conditions over which the parties may negotiate may be unilaterally abrogated by management, a system of this sort does not even give the illusion of collective bargaining. AFGE General Counsel Mark Roth says the ruling:

AFGE General Counsel Mark Roth says the ruling:

Validates the right of federal employees to have a voice over their working conditions. This is a tremendous win and gives us momentum for honest and meaningful discussions with the administration.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC