Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: Losing the Good War: Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:12 AM
Original message
NYT editorial: Losing the Good War: Afghanistan
Losing the Good War
Published: December 5, 2006

Afghanistan was supposed to be the good war — and the war America was winning. But because of the Bush administration’s inattention and mismanagement, even the good war is going wrong.

The latest grim news is that after years of effort — and more than $1 billion spent — Afghanistan’s American-trained police force is unable to perform even routine law enforcement work. According to an article in yesterday’s Times, investigators for the Pentagon and the State Department found that the training program’s managers did not even know how many police officers were serving, while thousands of trucks and other American-purchased police equipment have simply disappeared.

The failure to provide local security — or even a semblance of impartial justice — helps explain why so many Afghans have lost confidence in the pro-Western government of President Hamid Karzai, and why a growing number are again turning to the Taliban for protection. The failure to stand up an effective police force also helps explain why opium cultivation rose by nearly 60 percent this year....

***

Mr. Bush’s decision to rush off to invade Iraq meant that Afghanistan would be shortchanged when it came to resources and to policy makers’ priority lists. The cost of that inattention can be seen in the failing Afghan police force. It can also be seen in the Taliban’s growing strength, the mounting death toll of Afghan civilians and NATO troops, and the unraveling of the Karzai government. So much for winning the good war.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/05/opinion/05tue1.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a mess the GOP has left to the democrats to clean up
Maybe W will finally see his legacy going down in flames and will let the military officers such as Murtha clean up the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The good war" .... really sick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karash Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. .
Ah yes. How easy the civilian deaths in Afghanistan become to ignore once all the progressives have decided that Iraq is worse. The Iraq war, with the 5-year half-life on its even-more-obviously-false rationales, managed to run delightful cover for the transnational oil pipeline in Afghanistan that may prove a bigger prize than even Saddam's former oil fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. 1 billion spent on Afganistan, 350 billion on Iraq. Anyone see
a problem here?????????/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC