Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most Chicken Harbors Harmful Bacteria ...83%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:41 AM
Original message
Most Chicken Harbors Harmful Bacteria ...83%
Dec. 4, 2006 -- Even if you go for the more expensive organic or antibiotic-free chicken, the chicken you buy at the grocery store probably contains bacteria that can make you sick. But safe handling and proper cooking can reduce the risk.

A startling 83% of the chickens tested in a recent Consumer Reports investigation were contaminated with one or both of the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease -- salmonella and campylobacter.

That is up from 49% in 2003, when the group last reported on contamination in chickens. However, the results are similar to the contamination found in 1997, when almost three-fourths of the broilers Consumer Reports tested were positive for salmonella or campylobacter.

In their new report, "Dirty Birds," investigators with Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, concluded that paying more for a chicken does not increase your chances of getting one free of illness-causing bacteria.

Jean Halloran of Consumers Union tells WebMD that fewer than one if five birds tested (17%) were free of both pathogens, the lowest percentage of clean birds recorded since the group began testing chickens eight years ago.

http://www.webmd.com/content/Article/130/117698.htm?printing=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, Chickenshit happens, and commercial gutting bathes the carcasses
in any crap escaping guts that are ripped open.

The same is pretty much true of egg surfaces. We probably should be coddling any egg used as raw.

But the thing to remember about food-borne diseases is that whatever makes you sick but doesn't kill you...is probably still waiting out there to kill you later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. So you make sure to cook it.
Wash it and handle it safely and you have no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Make sure to wash hands after pooping 'cause most people harbor harmful bacteria too.
Probably 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broadslidin Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Tis Wise To Check Out What Intrepid D.U. Investigators have Found......!!
Thank You RedEarth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchleary Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. One reason
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 11:07 AM by mitchleary
I do not eat animals anymore. Meat production in this country is a disgrace, the things cattle are injected with, the "living" conditions, the disease, the deplorable practices forcing cows and chickens to be cannibals. And when we run out of cows, are we going to start eating cats and dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's not all that way.
http://www.eatwild.com/

http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/csa/csa.shtml

Even in intensive confinement feeding situation, cattle are no longer fed bovine byproducts. They are not "forced" to be cannibals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even if the percentages were reversed
It would obviously not be a good idea to eat raw chicken. After eating undercooked chicken accidently (I microwaved it after realizing that it should have been cooked longer), I don't know who would really want to eat rare chicken. In my microbiology class, however, we found that most of the bacteria is in the skin. If you remove the skin from chicken yourself, rather than cooking it with skin or buying skinless, you probably should be especially careful in handling it and cleaning up surface contact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm reasonably certain that I'm chock full of harmful bacteria myself.
And I am far better treated than most food chickens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC