Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Smear this Time by Anita Hill - NY Times op-ed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:46 AM
Original message
The Smear this Time by Anita Hill - NY Times op-ed
Op-Ed Contributor
The Smear This Time - Anita Hill // 10/2/07 // NY Times

ON Oct. 11, 1991, I testified about my experience as an employee of Clarence Thomas’s at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

I stand by my testimony.

Justice Thomas has every right to present himself as he wishes in his new memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son.” He may even be entitled to feel abused by the confirmation process that led to his appointment to the Supreme Court.

But I will not stand by silently and allow him, in his anger, to reinvent me.

In the portion of his book that addresses my role in the Senate hearings into his nomination, Justice Thomas offers a litany of unsubstantiated representations and outright smears that Republican senators made about me when I testified before the Judiciary Committee — that I was a “combative left-winger” who was “touchy” and prone to overreacting to “slights.” A number of independent authors have shown those attacks to be baseless. What’s more, their reports draw on the experiences of others who were familiar with Mr. Thomas’s behavior, and who came forward after the hearings. It’s no longer my word against his.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/opinion/02hill.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. This book should really amplify Clarence's sense of martyrdom.
How nice of him to reveal his inner charm to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good for her. I'm very happy she spoke out. He really smeared her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sixteen years later and Clarence is still complaining.
I'm sick to death of this whiny neocon. He is a supreme court jester, I mean justice, for God's sake. He should be more mature and realize he won the battle. Despite making suggestive and lewd advances on a female employee, he still was confirmed. What is his beef? He doesn't make enough money? His prestige is not great enough? He can't sexually harass more women? His fellow neocons don't have enough power?

He is dragging a dead horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC