October 14, 2007 -- 11:23 AM EST
Talking Points Memo
You'd think this would be chastening to the wingnuts who are tormenting the family of SCHIP poster kid Graeme Frost. But of course it isn't, because nothing ever is.
As you all know, the winger bloggers have been mounting a smear campaign against the Frost family that is extraordinarily base even by their nonexistent standards.
<...>
WSJ says the false winger attacks are actually helping the Dems, adding:
Despite their howls about "the children," Democrats and their media partners are happy to milk them for political gain.
Unfortunately, that narrative was bolstered this week by some conservative bloggers. After the Schip veto, Democrats chose a 12-year-old boy named Graeme Frost to deliver a two-minute rebuttal. While that was a political stunt, the Washington habit of employing "poster children" is hardly new. But the Internet mob leapt to some dubious conclusions and claimed the Frost kids shouldn't have been on Schip in the first place.
As it turns out, they belonged to just the sort of family that a modest Schip is supposed to help.
Yep. When even the chronically dishonest WSJ editorial page denounces you for dishonesty on an issue it more or less agrees with you about, you're pretty far around the bend. The wingnuts, needless to say, remain unrepentant, howling away as always at illusions and mirages of their own making.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
